Literature DB >> 22437079

Partograph as a tool for team work management of spontaneous labor.

Aae Orhue1, M E Aziken, A P Osemwenkha.   

Abstract

It is presently being debated whether the partograph is a useful tool for labor supervision and, if useful, where should the action line be located between 2, 3 or 4 h to improve the fetomaternal outcome. This review adduces facts to show that this debate is because there is a poor understanding of the essence and purpose of the partograph. The partograph is a form on which labor observations are recorded to provide an overview of labor, aiming to alert midwives and obstetricians to deviations in labor progress as well as maternal and fetal wellbeing. When deviations in labor progress are recognized early and corrected, complications are prevented and normal labor and delivery can occur. The earliest deviation in labor progress is slow labor progress, for which the partograph alert line is a prompt for early recognition by the midwives and other non-obstetric staff. The intervention to correct the deviation is at the action line by the staff with the requisite skill. In the circumstance in which the partogram was produced, the action to correct the deviation in labor progress was after 4 h, represented by the 4-h action line, but other workers have attempted with 2- and 3-h action lines and have had equally good results. However, in all these, the action at the action line was instituted by the staff with the appropriate skill, irrespective of whether the action line was 2, 3 or 4 h. As long as the action at the action line is by the staff with the requisite training, the deviation in labor progress will be corrected by either medical or surgical means irrespective of the action line location at 2, 3 or 4 h. In conclusion, the essence and purpose of the partograph is to ensure that labor progress is monitored to identify slow labor by the alert line but appropriate treatment must begin at the action line by the staff with the cognate skill, whether at 2, 3 or 4 h. The appropriateness of the intervention at the action line is the determinant of the outcome and not the delay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22437079     DOI: 10.4103/1119-3077.94087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Niger J Clin Pract            Impact factor:   0.968


  9 in total

1.  The effect of the use of a new type of partogram on the cesarean section rates.

Authors:  Georgios Vlachos; Panagiotis Tsikouras; Bachar Manav; Grigorios Trypsianis; Vasileios Liberis; Sakellarios Karpathios; Georgios Galazios
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2015-08-06

2.  Partograph Utilization and Associated Factors among Obstetric Care Providers Working in Public Health Facilities of Wolaita Zone, 2017.

Authors:  Mesfin Markos; Aseb Arba; Kebreab Paulos
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2020-07-01

Review 3.  The Partograph in Childbirth: An Absolute Essentiality or a Mere Exercise?

Authors:  Asha R Dalal; Ameya C Purandare
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2017-10-16

4.  Willingness to Use Mobile based e-Partograph and Associated Factors among Care Providers in North Gondar Zone, Northwest Ethiopia.

Authors:  Yared Tadesse; Abebaw Addis Gelagay; Binyam Tilahun; Berhanu Fikadie Endehabtu; Zeleke Abebaw Mekonnen; Kassahun Dessie Gashu
Journal:  Online J Public Health Inform       Date:  2019-09-19

5.  Effect of partograph use on outcomes for women in spontaneous labour at term and their babies.

Authors:  Tina Lavender; Anna Cuthbert; Rebecca Md Smyth
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-08-06

Review 6.  Barriers to and incentives for achieving partograph use in obstetric practice in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elizabeth Ollerhead; David Osrin
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-08-16       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 7.  A realist review of the partograph: when and how does it work for labour monitoring?

Authors:  Carol Bedwell; Karen Levin; Celia Pett; Dame Tina Lavender
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Improving Tanzanian childbirth service quality.

Authors:  Jennie Jaribu; Suzanne Penfold; Cathy Green; Fatuma Manzi; Joanna Schellenberg
Journal:  Int J Health Care Qual Assur       Date:  2018-04-16

9.  [Ten years morbidity and mortality of newborns hospitalized at the Clinic El-Fateh Suka (Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso)].

Authors:  Kisito Nagalo; Fousséni Dao; François Housséini Tall; Diarra Yé
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2013-04-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.