Literature DB >> 22437074

Intensive care unit nurses' information needs and recommendations for integrated displays to improve nurses' situation awareness.

Sven H Koch1, Charlene Weir, Maral Haar, Nancy Staggers, Jim Agutter, Matthias Görges, Dwayne Westenskow.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Fatal errors can occur in intensive care units (ICUs). Researchers claim that information integration at the bedside may improve nurses' situation awareness (SA) of patients and decrease errors. However, it is unclear which information should be integrated and in what form. Our research uses the theory of SA to analyze the type of tasks, and their associated information gaps. We aimed to provide recommendations for integrated, consolidated information displays to improve nurses' SA.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Systematic observations methods were used to follow 19 ICU nurses for 38 hours in 3 clinical practice settings. Storyboard methods and concept mapping helped to categorize the observed tasks, the associated information needs, and the information gaps of the most frequent tasks by SA level. Consensus and discussion of the research team was used to propose recommendations to improve information displays at the bedside based on information deficits.
RESULTS: Nurses performed 46 different tasks at a rate of 23.4 tasks per hour. The information needed to perform the most common tasks was often inaccessible, difficult to see at a distance or located on multiple monitoring devices. Current devices at the ICU bedside do not adequately support a nurse's information-gathering activities. Medication management was the most frequent category of tasks. DISCUSSION: Information gaps were present at all levels of SA and across most of the tasks. Using a theoretical model to understand information gaps can aid in designing functional requirements.
CONCLUSION: Integrated information that enhances nurses' Situation Awareness may decrease errors and improve patient safety in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22437074      PMCID: PMC3384123          DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  32 in total

1.  A look into the nature and causes of human errors in the intensive care unit. 1995.

Authors:  Y Donchin; D Gopher; M Olin; Y Badihi; M Biesky; C L Sprung; R Pizov; S Cotev
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-04

2.  Clinical decision support and electronic prescribing systems: a time for responsible thought and action.

Authors:  Randolph A Miller; Reed M Gardner; Kevin B Johnson; George Hripcsak
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-05-19       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  A time-motion study of registered nurses' workflow in intensive care unit remote monitoring.

Authors:  Zhihua Tang; Janine Mazabob; Liza Weavind; Eric Thomas; Todd R Johnson
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

4.  Improving alarm performance in the medical intensive care unit using delays and clinical context.

Authors:  Matthias Görges; Boaz A Markewitz; Dwayne R Westenskow
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  Clinical dashboards: impact on workflow, care quality, and patient safety.

Authors:  Marie Egan
Journal:  Crit Care Nurs Q       Date:  2006 Oct-Dec

6.  The Critical Care Safety Study: The incidence and nature of adverse events and serious medical errors in intensive care.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Rothschild; Christopher P Landrigan; John W Cronin; Rainu Kaushal; Steven W Lockley; Elisabeth Burdick; Peter H Stone; Craig M Lilly; Joel T Katz; Charles A Czeisler; David W Bates
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  A 36-hospital time and motion study: how do medical-surgical nurses spend their time?

Authors:  Ann Hendrich; Marilyn P Chow; Boguslaw A Skierczynski; Zhenqiang Lu
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2008

8.  Transforming healthcare: a safety imperative.

Authors:  L Leape; D Berwick; C Clancy; J Conway; P Gluck; J Guest; D Lawrence; J Morath; D O'Leary; P O'Neill; D Pinakiewicz; T Isaac
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2009-12

Review 9.  A systematic review of the designs of clinical technology: findings and recommendations for future research.

Authors:  Greg Alexander; Nancy Staggers
Journal:  ANS Adv Nurs Sci       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.824

10.  Improving communication in the ICU using daily goals.

Authors:  Peter Pronovost; Sean Berenholtz; Todd Dorman; Pam A Lipsett; Terri Simmonds; Carol Haraden
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.425

View more
  10 in total

1.  Patient information organization in the intensive care setting: expert knowledge elicitation with card sorting methods.

Authors:  Thomas Reese; Noa Segall; Paige Nesbitt; Guilherme Del Fiol; Rosalie Waller; Brekk C Macpherson; Joseph E Tonna; Melanie C Wright
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  Towards Usable E-Health. A Systematic Review of Usability Questionnaires.

Authors:  Vanessa E C Sousa; Karen Dunn Lopez
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Clinician-Driven Design of VitalPAD-An Intelligent Monitoring and Communication Device to Improve Patient Safety in the Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Luisa Flohr; Shaylene Beaudry; K Taneille Johnson; Nicholas West; Catherine M Burns; J Mark Ansermino; Guy A Dumont; David Wensley; Peter Skippen; Matthias Gorges
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 3.316

Review 4.  Novel Interface Designs for Patient Monitoring Applications in Critical Care Medicine: Human Factors Review.

Authors:  Evismar Andrade; Leo Quinlan; Richard Harte; Dara Byrne; Enda Fallon; Martina Kelly; Siobhan Casey; Frank Kirrane; Paul O'Connor; Denis O'Hora; Michael Scully; John Laffey; Patrick Pladys; Alain Beuchée; Gearóid ÓLaighin
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2020-07-03

Review 5.  Research Trends in Artificial Intelligence Applications in Human Factors Health Care: Mapping Review.

Authors:  Onur Asan; Avishek Choudhury
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2021-06-18

6.  Identifying factors that nurses consider in the decision-making process related to patient care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Nicholas Anton; Tera Hornbeck; Susan Modlin; Md Munirul Haque; Megan Crites; Denny Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Participatory eHealth development to support nurses in antimicrobial stewardship.

Authors:  Jobke Wentzel; Lex van Velsen; Maarten van Limburg; Nienke de Jong; Joyce Karreman; Ron Hendrix; Julia Elisabeth Wilhelmina Cornelia van Gemert-Pijnen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  Factors related to monitoring during admission of acute patients.

Authors:  Thomas Schmidt; Camilla N Bech; Mikkel Brabrand; Uffe Kock Wiil; Annmarie Lassen
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 2.502

9.  Faster clinical response to the onset of adverse events: A wearable metacognitive attention aid for nurse triage of clinical alarms.

Authors:  Daniel C McFarlane; Alexa K Doig; James A Agutter; Lara M Brewer; Noah D Syroid; Ranjeev Mittu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Different roles with different goals: Designing to support shared situational awareness between patients and clinicians in the hospital.

Authors:  Ari H Pollack; Sonali R Mishra; Calvin Apodaca; Maher Khelifi; Shefali Haldar; Wanda Pratt
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 4.497

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.