Literature DB >> 22436832

Incidence of residual clot strands in saphenous vein grafts after endoscopic harvest.

Nicholas Burris1, Kimberly Schwartz, Jamie Brown, Michael Kwon, Richard Pierson, Bartley Griffith, Robert Poston.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: : Strands of clot are frequently flushed out of saphenous vein grafts (SVG) during preparation for grafting, particularly those that are endoscopically harvested. However, saline distention at uncontrolled pressures increases graft thrombogenicity and the risk of early failure after coronary artery bypass grafting. The purpose of this prospective investigation was to define the incidence of intraluminal clot within endoscopically harvested SVG and the effect of attempted removal by saline distention.
METHODS: : Endoscopically harvested SVG were intraoperatively prepared for grafting by using saline distention at uncontrolled pressure (n = 24) or without distension (n = 20). Optical coherence tomography, a catheter-based infrared imaging system, was used to identify and characterize intraluminal clot strands in surplus SVG segments (average length for analysis, 4.9 ± 2.6 cm). These segments were also assessed for luminal tissue factor activity and percent endothelial integrity by CD31-directed immunohistochemistry.
RESULTS: : Clot strands were observed in 45.4% (20 of 44) of imaged SVG segments (severity of observed clots: 54%, mild; 32%, moderate; 14%, severe). Compared with grafts distended with saline, vein segments that were not distended displayed significantly higher endothelial integrity (60.1% ± 27.2% versus 24.7% ± 24.1%, P < 0.05) and lower tissue factor activity (1.28 ± 0.95 versus12.3 ± 5.5 U/cm, P < 0.001) despite having a higher incidence of clot stands (65.0% versus 29.1%, P < 0.02, Fisher exact test). Static flow was observed in veins during endoscopic harvest.
CONCLUSIONS: : Clot strands of varying severity are a common finding after endoscopic vein harvest. Saline distention is not completely effective in removing clot strands and increases overall graft thrombogenicity. Therefore, prevention of clot or less traumatic methods of removing clot are indicated.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 22436832     DOI: 10.1097/IMI.0b013e31802f4399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Innovations (Phila)        ISSN: 1556-9845


  5 in total

Review 1.  Is endoscopic harvesting bad for saphenous vein graft patency in coronary surgery?

Authors:  Soroosh Kiani; Robert Poston
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.161

Review 2.  Endoscopic vein harvesting: technique, outcomes, concerns & controversies.

Authors:  Shahzad G Raja; Zubair Sarang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Impact of the learning curve for endoscopic vein harvest on conduit quality and early graft patency.

Authors:  Pranjal Desai; Soroosh Kiani; Nannan Thiruvanthan; Stanislav Henkin; Dinesh Kurian; Pluen Ziu; Alex Brown; Nisarg Patel; Robert Poston
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Thinking inside the graft: applications of optical coherence tomography in coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Emile N Brown; Nicholas S Burris; Junyan Gu; Zachary N Kon; Patrick Laird; Seeta Kallam; Cha-Min Tang; Joseph M Schmitt; Robert S Poston
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Strategies to reduce intraluminal clot formation in endoscopically harvested saphenous veins.

Authors:  Emile N Brown; Zachary N Kon; Richard Tran; Nicholas S Burris; Junyen Gu; Patrick Laird; Philip S Brazio; Seeta Kallam; Kimberly Schwartz; Lisa Bechtel; Ashish Joshi; Shaosong Zhang; Robert S Poston
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 5.209

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.