Literature DB >> 21524447

Impact of the learning curve for endoscopic vein harvest on conduit quality and early graft patency.

Pranjal Desai1, Soroosh Kiani, Nannan Thiruvanthan, Stanislav Henkin, Dinesh Kurian, Pluen Ziu, Alex Brown, Nisarg Patel, Robert Poston.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have suggested that endoscopic vein harvest (EVH) compromises graft patency. To test whether the learning curve for EVH alters conduit integrity owing to increased trauma compared with an open harvest, we analyzed the quality and early patency of conduits procured by technicians with varying EVH experience.
METHODS: During coronary artery bypass grafting, veins were harvested open (n=10) or by EVH (n=85) performed by experienced (>900 cases, >30/month) versus novice<100 cases, <3/month) technicians. Harvested conduits were imaged intraoperatively using optical coherence tomography and on day 5 to assess graft patency using computed tomographic angiography.
RESULTS: Conduits from experienced (n=55) versus novice (n=30) harvesters had similar lengths (33 versus 34 cm) and harvest times (32.4 versus 31.8 minutes). Conduit injury was noted in both EVH groups with similar distribution among disruption of the adventitia (62%), intimal tears at branch points (23%), and intimal or medial dissections (15%), but the incidence of these injuries was less with experienced harvesters and rare in veins procured with an open technique. Overall, the rate of graft attrition was similar between the two EVH groups (6.45% versus 4.34% of grafts; p=0.552). However, vein grafts with at least 4 intimal or medial dissections showed significantly worse patency (67% versus 96% patency; p=0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: High-resolution imaging confirmed that technicians inexperienced with EVH are more likely to cause intimal and deep vessel injury to the saphenous vein graft, which increases graft failure risk. Endoscopic vein harvest remains the most common technique for conduit harvest, making efforts to better monitor the learning curve an important public health issue.
Copyright © 2011 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21524447      PMCID: PMC4146432          DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.01.079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  31 in total

1.  Endoscopic Vascular Harvest in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery: A Consensus Statement of the International Society of Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery (ISMICS) 2005.

Authors:  Keith Allen; Davy Cheng; William Cohn; Mark Connolly; James Edgerton; Volkmar Falk; Janet Martin; Toshiya Ohtsuka; Richard Vitali
Journal:  Innovations (Phila)       Date:  2005

Review 2.  Minimally invasive conduit harvesting: a systematic review.

Authors:  Omer Aziz; Thanos Athanasiou; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 3.  Coronary artery bypass grafts: assessment with multidetector CT in the early and late postoperative settings.

Authors:  Aletta Ann Frazier; Fauzia Qureshi; Katrina M Read; Robert C Gilkeson; Robert S Poston; Charles S White
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  Bypass of the right and circumflex coronary arteries with the internal mammary artery.

Authors:  E J Jahnke; J W Love
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Radial artery grafts vs saphenous vein grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Steven Goldman; Gulshan K Sethi; William Holman; Hoang Thai; Edward McFalls; Herbert B Ward; Rosemary F Kelly; Birger Rhenman; Gareth H Tobler; Faisal G Bakaeen; Joseph Huh; Ernesto Soltero; Mohammed Moursi; Miguel Haime; Michael Crittenden; Vigneshwar Kasirajan; Michelle Ratliff; Stewart Pett; Anand Irimpen; William Gunnar; Donald Thomas; Stephen Fremes; Thomas Moritz; Domenic Reda; Lynn Harrison; Todd H Wagner; Yajie Wang; Lori Planting; Meredith Miller; Yvette Rodriguez; Elizabeth Juneman; Douglass Morrison; Mary Kaye Pierce; Sandra Kreamer; Mei-Chiung Shih; Kelvin Lee
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Routine minimal invasive vein harvesting reduces postoperative morbidity in cardiac bypass procedures. Clinical report of 1400 patients.

Authors:  R Coppoolse; W Rees; R Krech; M Hufnagel; K Seufert; H Warnecke
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.191

7.  Risk factors for leg wound complications following endoscopic versus traditional saphenous vein harvesting.

Authors:  K B Allen; D A Heimansohn; R J Robison; J J Schier; G L Griffith; E B Fitzgerald; J H Isch; S Abraham; C J Shaar
Journal:  Heart Surg Forum       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 0.676

8.  Optical coherence tomography imaging as a quality assurance tool for evaluating endoscopic harvest of the radial artery.

Authors:  Nicholas S Burris; Emile N Brown; Michael Grant; Zachary N Kon; Marc Gibber; Junyen Gu; Kimberly Schwartz; Seeta Kallam; Ashish Joshi; Richard Vitali; Robert S Poston
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Evaluation of the PAS-Port Proximal Anastomosis System in coronary artery bypass surgery (the EPIC trial).

Authors:  John D Puskas; Michael E Halkos; Husam Balkhy; Michael Caskey; Mark Connolly; John Crouch; Anno Diegeler; Jan Gummert; Wolfgang Harringer; Valavanur Subramanian; Francis Sutter; Klaus Matschke
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Frequency, manifestations, and correlates of impaired healing of saphenous vein harvest incisions.

Authors:  D D Wipke-Tevis; N A Stotts; P Skov; V Carrieri-Kohlman
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.210

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Is endoscopic harvesting bad for saphenous vein graft patency in coronary surgery?

Authors:  Soroosh Kiani; Robert Poston
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.161

Review 2.  Endoscopic vein harvesting: technique, outcomes, concerns & controversies.

Authors:  Shahzad G Raja; Zubair Sarang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Application of Endoscopic Vein Harvesting in Obese Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Authors:  Peng Bai; Yi-Xuan Wang; Si Chen; Jin-Ping Liu; Nian-Guo Dong; Jun-Wei Liu
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2018-08-20

4.  Endoscopic venous harvesting by inexperienced operators compromises venous graft remodeling.

Authors:  Soroosh Kiani; Pranjal H Desai; Nannan Thirumvalavan; Dinesh John Kurian; Mary Margaret Flynn; XiaoQing Zhao; Robert S Poston
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  A multicentre review comparing long term outcomes of endoscopic vein harvesting versus open vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass surgery [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations].

Authors:  Bhuvaneswari Krishnamoorthy; Joesph Zacharias; William R Critchley; Melissa Rochon; Iryna Stalpinskaya; Azita Rajai; Rajamiyer V Venkateswaran; Shahzad G Raja; Toufan Bahrami
Journal:  NIHR Open Res       Date:  2021-07-08

6.  Endoscopic harvesting device type and outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Sean van Diepen; J Matthew Brennan; Gail E Hafley; Eric M Reyes; Keith B Allen; T Bruce Ferguson; Eric D Peterson; Judson B Williams; C Michael Gibson; Michael J Mack; Nicholas T Kouchoukos; John H Alexander; Renato D Lopes
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Early Outcomes of Endoscopic Vein Harvesting during the Initial Learning Period.

Authors:  Do Yeon Kim; Hyun Song; Hwan Wook Kim; Gyun Hyun Jo; Joonkyu Kang
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-06-05

Review 8.  A comprehensive review on learning curve associated problems in endoscopic vein harvesting and the requirement for a standardised training programme.

Authors:  Bhuvaneswari Krishnamoorthy; William R Critchley; Rajamiyer V Venkateswaran; James Barnard; Ann Caress; James E Fildes; Nizar Yonan
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 1.637

Review 9.  Endoscopic vein harvesting.

Authors:  Enoch Akowuah; Daniel Burns; Joseph Zacharias; Bilal H Kirmani
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Graft patency after open versus endoscopic saphenous vein harvest in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Karishma Kodia; Sinal Patel; Matthew P Weber; Jessica G Y Luc; Jae Hwan Choi; Elizabeth J Maynes; Syed-Saif Abbas Rizvi; Dylan P Horan; H Todd Massey; John W Entwistle; Rohinton J Morris; Vakhtang Tchantchaleishvili
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.