Literature DB >> 22436798

In vivo biocompatibility and biodegradation of 3D-printed porous scaffolds based on a hydroxyl-functionalized poly(ε-caprolactone).

Hajar Seyednejad1, Debby Gawlitta, Raoul V Kuiper, Alain de Bruin, Cornelus F van Nostrum, Tina Vermonden, Wouter J A Dhert, Wim E Hennink.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vivo biodegradation and biocompatibility of three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds based on a hydroxyl-functionalized polyester (poly(hydroxymethylglycolide-co-ε-caprolactone), PHMGCL), which has enhanced hydrophilicity, increased degradation rate, and improved cell-material interactions as compared to its counterpart poly(ε-caprolactone), PCL. In this study, 3D scaffolds based on this polymer (PHMGCL, HMG:CL 8:92) were prepared by means of fiber deposition (melt-plotting). The biodegradation and tissue biocompatibility of PHMGCL and PCL scaffolds after subcutaneous implantation in Balb/c mice were investigated. At 4 and 12 weeks post implantation, the scaffolds were retrieved and evaluated for extent of degradation by measuring the residual weight of the scaffolds, thermal properties (DSC), and morphology (SEM) whereas the polymer was analyzed for both its composition ((1)H NMR) and molecular weight (GPC). The scaffolds with infiltrated tissues were harvested, fixed, stained and histologically analyzed. The in vitro enzymatic degradation of these scaffolds was also investigated in lipase solutions. It was shown that PHMGCL 3D-scaffolds lost more than 60% of their weight within 3 months of implantation while PCL scaffolds showed no weight loss in this time frame. The molecular weight (M(w)) of PHMGCL decreased from 46.9 kDa before implantation to 23.2 kDa after 3 months of implantation, while the molecular weight of PCL was unchanged in this period. (1)H NMR analysis showed that the degradation of PHMGCL was characterized by a loss of HMG units. In vitro enzymatic degradation showed that PHMGCL scaffolds were degraded within 50 h, while the degradation time for PCL scaffolds of similar structure was 72 h. A normal foreign body response to both scaffold types characterized by the presence of macrophages, lymphocytes, and fibrosis was observed with a more rapid onset in PHMGCL scaffolds. The extent of tissue-scaffold interactions as well as vascularization was shown to be higher for PHMGCL scaffolds compared to PCL ones. Therefore, the fast degradable PHMGCL which showed good biocompatibility is a promising biomaterial for tissue engineering applications.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22436798     DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  44 in total

1.  Effect of bone sialoprotein coating on progression of bone formation in a femoral defect model in rats.

Authors:  Anja Klein; Andreas Baranowski; Ulrike Ritz; Christiane Mack; Hermann Götz; Eva Langendorf; Bilal Al-Nawas; Philipp Drees; Pol M Rommens; Alexander Hofmann
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Rational design of hydrogels to enhance osteogenic potential.

Authors:  Soyon Kim; Min Lee
Journal:  Chem Mater       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 9.811

Review 3.  Three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: role of porosity and pore size.

Authors:  Qiu Li Loh; Cleo Choong
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 4.  3D Printing of Calcium Phosphate Ceramics for Bone Tissue Engineering and Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Ryan Trombetta; Jason A Inzana; Edward M Schwarz; Stephen L Kates; Hani A Awad
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  In vivo biocompatibility evaluation of electrospun composite scaffolds by subcutaneous implantation in rat.

Authors:  Amit K Jaiswal; Rohit V Dhumal; Jayesh R Bellare; Geeta R Vanage
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.617

6.  Novel chitosan hydrogel formed by ethylene glycol chitosan, 1,6-diisocyanatohexan and polyethylene glycol-400 for tissue engineering scaffold: in vitro and in vivo evaluation.

Authors:  Zhu Chen; Ming Zhao; Kang Liu; Yuqing Wan; Xudong Li; Gang Feng
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  Redox-Responsive, Core Cross-Linked Polyester Micelles.

Authors:  Zhonghai Zhang; Lichen Yin; Chunlai Tu; Ziyuan Song; Yanfeng Zhang; Yunxiang Xu; Rong Tong; Qin Zhou; Jie Ren; Jianjun Cheng
Journal:  ACS Macro Lett       Date:  2012-12-24       Impact factor: 6.903

Review 8.  Bridging the Gap: From 2D Cell Culture to 3D Microengineered Extracellular Matrices.

Authors:  Yanfen Li; Kristopher A Kilian
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 9.933

9.  Biofabrication of reinforced 3D-scaffolds using two-component hydrogels.

Authors:  Kristel W M Boere; Maarten M Blokzijl; Jetze Visser; J Elder A Linssen; Jos Malda; Wim E Hennink; Tina Vermonden
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 6.331

Review 10.  Naturally derived and synthetic scaffolds for skeletal muscle reconstruction.

Authors:  Matthew T Wolf; Christopher L Dearth; Sonya B Sonnenberg; Elizabeth G Loboa; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 15.470

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.