PURPOSE: To investigate how the selection of ion type affects the calculated isoeffective dose to the surrounding normal tissue as a function of both normal tissue and target tissue α/β ratios. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A microdosimetric biologic dose model was incorporated into a Geant4 simulation of parallel opposed beams of protons, helium, lithium, beryllium, carbon, and neon ions. The beams were constructed to give a homogeneous isoeffective dose to a volume in the center of a water phantom for target tissues covering a range of cobalt equivalent α/β ratios of 1-20 Gy. Concomitant normal tissue isoeffective doses in the plateau of the ion beam were then compared for different ions across the range of normal tissue and target tissue radiosensitivities for a fixed isoeffective dose to the target tissue. RESULTS: The ion type yielding the optimal normal tissue sparing was highly dependent on the α/β ratio of both the normal and the target tissue. For carbon ions, the calculated isoeffective dose to normal tissue at a 5-cm depth varied by almost a factor of 5, depending on the α/β ratios of the normal and target tissue. This ranges from a factor of 2 less than the isoeffective dose of a similar proton treatment to a factor of 2 greater. CONCLUSIONS: No single ion is optimal for all treatment scenarios. The heavier ions are superior in cases in which the α/β ratio of the target tissue is low and the α/β ratio of normal tissue is high, and protons are superior in the opposite circumstances. Lithium and beryllium appear to offer dose advantages similar to carbon, with a considerably lower normal tissue dose when the α/β ratio in the target tissue is high and the α/β ratio in the normal tissue is low.
PURPOSE: To investigate how the selection of ion type affects the calculated isoeffective dose to the surrounding normal tissue as a function of both normal tissue and target tissue α/β ratios. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A microdosimetric biologic dose model was incorporated into a Geant4 simulation of parallel opposed beams of protons, helium, lithium, beryllium, carbon, and neon ions. The beams were constructed to give a homogeneous isoeffective dose to a volume in the center of a water phantom for target tissues covering a range of cobalt equivalent α/β ratios of 1-20 Gy. Concomitant normal tissue isoeffective doses in the plateau of the ion beam were then compared for different ions across the range of normal tissue and target tissue radiosensitivities for a fixed isoeffective dose to the target tissue. RESULTS: The ion type yielding the optimal normal tissue sparing was highly dependent on the α/β ratio of both the normal and the target tissue. For carbon ions, the calculated isoeffective dose to normal tissue at a 5-cm depth varied by almost a factor of 5, depending on the α/β ratios of the normal and target tissue. This ranges from a factor of 2 less than the isoeffective dose of a similar proton treatment to a factor of 2 greater. CONCLUSIONS: No single ion is optimal for all treatment scenarios. The heavier ions are superior in cases in which the α/β ratio of the target tissue is low and the α/β ratio of normal tissue is high, and protons are superior in the opposite circumstances. Lithium and beryllium appear to offer dose advantages similar to carbon, with a considerably lower normal tissue dose when the α/β ratio in the target tissue is high and the α/β ratio in the normal tissue is low.
Authors: Žakula Jelena; Korićanac Lela; Keta Otilija; Todorović Danijela; A P Cirrone Giuseppe; Romano Francesco; Cuttone Giacomo; Petrović Ivan; Ristić-Fira Aleksandra Journal: Indian J Med Res Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 2.375