Literature DB >> 22436769

Experience with robotic lobectomy for lung cancer.

Giulia Veronesi1, Bernardo G Agoglia, Franca Melfi, Patrick Maisonneuve, Raffaella Bertolotti, Paolo P Bianchi, Bernardo Rocco, Alessandro Borri, Roberto Gasparri, Lorenzo Spaggiari.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we analyze our experience so far with robotic pulmonary lobectomy, compare it with published data, and suggest a learning curve for the operation.
METHODS: Ninety-one patients with suspected or proven clinical stage I-III lung cancer underwent robotic lobectomy. Selection criteria included lesion <5 cm and normal respiratory function. One surgeon performed the operations using the da Vinci system with three ports and a 3-cm utility thoracotomy.
RESULTS: Median duration of operation was 239 (range 85-411) minutes, 260 minutes in the first 18 patients and 221 minutes in the remaining 73 cases (P=0.01). Median hospitalization declined from 6 days in the first 18 cases to 5 days in the remaining cases (P=0.002). Conversion rate and number of complications reduced nonsignificantly from the initial to later series. Major complications occurred in 11% of the first 18 cases and 4% of the later cases. The number of lymph nodes removed did not change over the two series. There was no 30-day postoperative mortality. After a median follow-up of 24 months, 80 of 91 patients were alive with no sign of disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that about 20 operations are required to achieve surgical competence. Robotic lobectomy appears safe, oncologically radical, and associated with shorter postoperative hospitalization than open surgery.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22436769     DOI: 10.1097/IMI.0b013e3182490093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Innovations (Phila)        ISSN: 1556-9845


  26 in total

Review 1.  Robotic Surgery for Thoracic Disease.

Authors:  Shin-Ichi Yamashita; Yasuhiro Yoshida; Akinori Iwasaki
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 1.520

Review 2.  [Application of the da Vinci robotic system in thoracic surgery].

Authors:  M Ismail; M Swierzy; M Ulrich; J C Rückert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  A systematic review and meta-analysis on pulmonary resections by robotic video-assisted thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Christopher Cao; Con Manganas; Su C Ang; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-05

4.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic pulmonary resections - The Melbourne experience.

Authors:  Gavin M Wright
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-05

5.  Robotic anatomic lung resections: the initial experience and description of learning in 102 cases.

Authors:  Alper Toker; Mehmet Oğuzhan Özyurtkan; Erkan Kaba; Kemal Ayalp; Özkan Demirhan; Elena Uyumaz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Defining the learning curve of robotic thoracic surgery: what does it take?

Authors:  Alexandra D Power; Desmond M D'Souza; Susan D Moffatt-Bruce; Robert E Merritt; Peter J Kneuertz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Robotic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Brian E Louie
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-02-12

8.  Robotic thoracic surgery results in shorter hospital stay and lower postoperative pain compared to open thoracotomy: a matched pairs analysis.

Authors:  Christopher Darr; Danjouma Cheufou; Gerhard Weinreich; Thomas Hachenberg; Clemens Aigner; Sandra Kampe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Three-dimensional video-assisted thoracic surgery for pulmonary resections: an update.

Authors:  Duilio Divisi; Mirko Barone; Roberto Crisci
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-06-04

Review 10.  Robotic lung resections: video-assisted thoracic surgery based approach.

Authors:  Alper Toker; Erkan Kaba; Kemal Ayalp; Mehmet Oğuzhan Özyurtkan
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-02-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.