Literature DB >> 22434530

Effectiveness of a bone substitute (CERAMENT™) as an alternative to PMMA in percutaneous vertebroplasty: 1-year follow-up on clinical outcome.

Stefano Marcia1, Claudia Boi, Mario Dragani, Stefano Marini, Mariangela Marras, Emanuele Piras, Giovanni Carlo Anselmetti, Salvatore Masala.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of an injectable and partly absorbable calcium bone cement (CERAMENT™, Bone Support, Sweden) in the treatment of osteoporotic or traumatic vertebral fractures by percutaneous vertebroplasty.
METHODS: From March 2009 to October 2010 an open, prospective study in two centres was performed. 33 patients with symptomatic vertebral fractures were enrolled. Patients were included based on evaluation by X-ray, CT, and MRI. Clinical evaluation by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, 0-10) and Oswestry Disability index test (ODI, 0-100 %) was performed before the operation as well as 1, 6 and 12 months after the procedure. Radiology assessment post-procedure was carried out by X-ray, CT, and MRI at 1, 6 and 12 months post-op. Intake of analgesic medications pre- and post-procedure was monitored.
RESULTS: 66 vertebral bodies underwent percutaneous vertebroplasty. VAS score demonstrated a significant decrease from 8.61 (SD 19.8) pre-operatively to 2.48 (SD 2.36) at 1 month. The score was 2.76 (SD 2.68) at 6 months and 1.36 (SD 1.33) at the latest follow up. ODI score dropped significantly from 58.86 pre-op to 26.94 at 6 months and further down to 7.61 at 12 months. No re-fractures or adjacent level fractures were reported.
CONCLUSION: Data show that CERAMENT can be a substitute of PMMA in the treatment of osteoporotic and traumatic vertebral fractures, especially in young patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22434530      PMCID: PMC3325384          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2228-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  15 in total

1.  Biocompatibility of alendronate-loaded acrylic cement for vertebroplasty.

Authors:  T Calvo-Fernández; J Parra; M Fernández-Gutiérrez; B Vázquez-Lasa; A López-Bravo; F Collía; M A Pérez de la Cruz; J San Román
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 3.942

2.  Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures augmentation by injectable partly resorbable ceramic bone substitute (Cerament™|SPINE SUPPORT): a prospective nonrandomized study.

Authors:  Salvatore Masala; Giovanni Nano; Stefano Marcia; Mario Muto; Francesco Paolo Maria Fucci; Giovanni Simonetti
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Therapeutic efficacy of injectable calcium phosphate cement in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: prospective nonrandomized controlled study at 6-month follow-up.

Authors:  Kyeong-Sik Ryu; Jung-Hyun Shim; Han-Yong Heo; Chun-Kun Park
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.104

4.  Prospective study of standalone balloon kyphoplasty with calcium phosphate cement augmentation in traumatic fractures.

Authors:  Gianluca Maestretti; Claus Cremer; Philippe Otten; Roland Peter Jakob
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Bioceramic vertebral augmentation with a calcium sulphate/hydroxyapatite composite (Cerament SpineSupport): in vertebral compression fractures due to osteoporosis.

Authors:  Michael Rauschmann; Thomas Vogl; Akhil Verheyden; Robert Pflugmacher; Thomas Werba; Sven Schmidt; Johannes Hierholzer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Injectable acrylic bone cements for vertebroplasty based on a radiopaque hydroxyapatite. Bioactivity and biocompatibility.

Authors:  Lidia Hernández; Juan Parra; Blanca Vázquez; Antonio López Bravo; Francisco Collía; Isabel Goñi; Marilo Gurruchaga; Julio San Román
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.368

7.  Calcium-phosphate and polymethylmethacrylate cement in long-term outcome after kyphoplasty of painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Ingo A Grafe; Martin Baier; Gerd Nöldge; Christel Weiss; Katharina Da Fonseca; Jochen Hillmeier; Martin Libicher; Gottfried Rudofsky; Cornelia Metzner; Peter Nawroth; Peter-Jürgen Meeder; Christian Kasperk
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Injectable calcium phosphate cement: effects of powder-to-liquid ratio and needle size.

Authors:  Elena F Burguera; Hockin H K Xu; Limin Sun
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.368

9.  Comparison of kyphoplasty with use of a calcium phosphate cement and non-operative therapy in patients with traumatic non-osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Nicole Schmelzer-Schmied; C Cartens; P J Meeder; K Dafonseca
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Biomechanical evaluation of an injectable calcium phosphate cement for vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Tae-Hong Lim; Gregory T Brebach; Susan M Renner; Whoan-Jeang Kim; Jesse G Kim; Richard E Lee; Gunnar B J Andersson; Howard S An
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Injectable foams for regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Edna M Prieto; Jonathan M Page; Andrew J Harmata; Scott A Guelcher
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2013-10-11

Review 2.  Percutaneous stabilization of lumbar spine: a literature review and new options in treating spine pain.

Authors:  Stefano Marcia; Luca Saba; Mariangela Marras; Jasjit S Suri; Eros Calabria; Salvatore Masala
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  What's new in vertebral cementoplasty?

Authors:  Mario Muto; Gianluigi Guarnieri; Francesco Giurazza; Luigi Manfrè
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  [Biomechanical aspects of vertebral augmentation].

Authors:  H-J Wilke
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Treatment of painful Modic type I changes by vertebral augmentation with bioactive resorbable bone cement.

Authors:  Salvatore Masala; Giovanni Carlo Anselmetti; Stefano Marcia; Giovanni Nano; Amedeo Taglieri; Eros Calabria; Marcello Chiocchi; Giovanni Simonetti
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Osseointegration of Titanium Implants in Onlay of Cerament™, a New Ceramic Bone Substitute.

Authors:  Anna Truedsson; Jian-Sheng Wang; Pia Lindberg; Gunnar Warfvinge
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2016-01-07

Review 7.  Outcome Instruments in Spinal Trauma Surgery: A Bibliometric Analysis.

Authors:  Holt S Cutler; Javier Z Guzman; James Connolly; Motasem Al Maaieh; Branko Skovrlj; Samuel K Cho
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2016-03-07

Review 8.  The role of orthobiologics in foot and ankle surgery: Allogenic bone grafts and bone graft substitutes.

Authors:  James Wee; Gowreeson Thevendran
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-06-01

9.  The effect of a biphasic injectable bone substitute on the interface strength in a rabbit knee prosthesis model.

Authors:  Vasilis Zampelis; Magnus Tägil; Lars Lidgren; Hanna Isaksson; Isam Atroshi; Jian-Sheng Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Assessment of cellular viability on calcium sulphate/hydroxyapatite injectable scaffolds.

Authors:  Randa Alfotawi; Kurt Naudi; Matthew J Dalby; K Elizabeth Tanner; Jeremy D McMahon; Ashraf Ayoub
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 7.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.