OBJECTIVES: Health-care costs for the treatment of skin cancers are disproportionately high in many white populations, yet they can be reduced through the promotion of sun-protective behaviors. We investigated the lifetime health costs and benefits of sunscreen promotion in the primary prevention of skin cancers, including melanoma. METHODS: A decision-analytic model with Markov chains was used to integrate data from a central community-based randomized controlled trial conducted in Australia and other epidemiological and published sources. Incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year was the primary outcome. Extensive one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to test the uncertainty in the base findings with plausible variation to the model parameters. RESULTS: Using a combined household and government perspective, the discounted incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained from the sunscreen intervention was AU$40,890. Over the projected lifetime of the intervention cohort, this would prevent 33 melanomas, 168 cutaneous squamous-cell carcinomas, and 4 melanoma-deaths at a cost of approximately AU$808,000. The likelihood that the sunscreen intervention was cost-effective was 64% at a willingness-to-pay threshold of AU$50,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. CONCLUSIONS: Subject to the best-available evidence depicted in our model, the active promotion of routine sunscreen use to white populations residing in sunny settings is likely to be a cost-effective investment for governments and consumers over the long term. Copyright Â
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: Health-care costs for the treatment of skin cancers are disproportionately high in many white populations, yet they can be reduced through the promotion of sun-protective behaviors. We investigated the lifetime health costs and benefits of sunscreen promotion in the primary prevention of skin cancers, including melanoma. METHODS: A decision-analytic model with Markov chains was used to integrate data from a central community-based randomized controlled trial conducted in Australia and other epidemiological and published sources. Incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year was the primary outcome. Extensive one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to test the uncertainty in the base findings with plausible variation to the model parameters. RESULTS: Using a combined household and government perspective, the discounted incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained from the sunscreen intervention was AU$40,890. Over the projected lifetime of the intervention cohort, this would prevent 33 melanomas, 168 cutaneous squamous-cell carcinomas, and 4 melanoma-deaths at a cost of approximately AU$808,000. The likelihood that the sunscreen intervention was cost-effective was 64% at a willingness-to-pay threshold of AU$50,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. CONCLUSIONS: Subject to the best-available evidence depicted in our model, the active promotion of routine sunscreen use to white populations residing in sunny settings is likely to be a cost-effective investment for governments and consumers over the long term. Copyright Â
Authors: Guillermo Sánchez; John Nova; Andrea Esperanza Rodriguez-Hernandez; Roger David Medina; Carolina Solorzano-Restrepo; Jenny Gonzalez; Miguel Olmos; Kathie Godfrey; Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-07-25
Authors: Louisa G Gordon; Thomas M Elliott; Caradee Y Wright; Nicola Deghaye; Willie Visser Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2016-04-02 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Titus Josef Brinker; Marlene Heckl; Martina Gatzka; Markus V Heppt; Henrique Resende Rodrigues; Sven Schneider; Wiebke Sondermann; Carolina de Almeida E Silva; Michael C Kirchberger; Joachim Klode; Alexander H Enk; Sarah Knispel; Christof von Kalle; Ingo Stoffels; Dirk Schadendorf; Yasuhiro Nakamura; Stefan Esser; Aisllan Assis; Breno Bernardes-Souza Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2018-03-09 Impact factor: 4.773
Authors: Titus Josef Brinker; Bianca Lisa Faria; Martina Gatzka; Olber Moreira de Faria; Markus V Heppt; Michael C Kirchberger; Dirk Schadendorf; Yasuhiro Nakamura; Fabian Buslaff; Oscar Campos Lisboa; Ana Carla Cruz Oliveira; Henrique Augusto Lino; Breno Bernardes-Souza Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-03-06 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Christopher M Doran; Rod Ling; Joshua Byrnes; Melanie Crane; Anthony P Shakeshaft; Andrew Searles; Donna Perez Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-01-29 Impact factor: 3.240