Literature DB >> 22433577

Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society joint position statement on the perioperative management of patients with implanted pacemakers, defibrillators, and neurostimulating devices.

Jeff S Healey1, Richard Merchant, Chris Simpson, Timothy Tang, Marianne Beardsall, Stanley Tung, Jennifer A Fraser, Laurene Long, Janet M van Vlymen, Pirjo Manninen, Fiona Ralley, Lashmi Venkatraghavan, Raymond Yee, Bruce Prasloski, Shubhayan Sanatani, François Philippon.   

Abstract

There are more than 200,000 Canadians living with permanent pacemakers or implantable defibrillators, many of whom will require surgery or invasive procedures each year. They face potential hazards when undergoing surgery; however, with appropriate planning and education of operating room personnel, adverse device-related outcomes should be rare. This joint position statement from the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) and the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society (CAS) has been developed as an accessible reference for physicians and surgeons, providing an overview of the key issues for the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative care of these patients. The document summarizes the limited published literature in this field, but for most issues, relies heavily on the experience of the cardiologists and anesthesiologists who contributed to this work. This position statement outlines how to obtain information about an individual's type of pacemaker or implantable defibrillator and its programming. It also stresses the importance of determining if a patient is highly pacemaker-dependent and proposes a simple approach for nonelective evaluation of dependency. Although the document provides a comprehensive list of the intraoperative issues facing these patients, there is a focus on electromagnetic interference resulting from electrocautery and practical guidance is given regarding the characteristics of surgery, electrocautery, pacemakers, and defibrillators which are most likely to lead to interference. The document stresses the importance of preoperative consultation and planning to minimize complications. It reviews the relative merits of intraoperative magnet use vs reprogramming of devices and gives examples of situations where one or the other approach is preferable. Copyright Â
© 2012 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22433577     DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2011.08.121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Cardiol        ISSN: 0828-282X            Impact factor:   5.223


  10 in total

Review 1.  Management of cardiac implantable electronic devices during interventional pulmonology procedures.

Authors:  Abhishek Kumar; Samjot Singh Dhillon; Spandan Patel; Matthias Grube; Amit Noheria
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  [70-year-old male pacemaker patient with resuscitation due to ventricular fibrillation after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery : Preparation for the medical specialist examination: part 46].

Authors:  M Forkmann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  [Anesthesiological aspects of deep brain stimulation : special features of implementation and dealing with brain pacemaker carriers].

Authors:  M Seemann; N Zech; M Lange; J Hansen; E Hansen
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 4.  Management of Patients With Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices in Dental, Oral, and Maxillofacial Surgery.

Authors:  James Tom
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2016

5.  [Pacemaker, defibrillator and co : Perioperative handling of cardiac implantable electronic devices].

Authors:  K Ott; H Pressl; M Schramm; A Wutzl
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Electromagnetic interference in implantable cardioverter defibrillators: present but rare.

Authors:  Gesa von Olshausen; Ina-Christine Rondak; Carsten Lennerz; Verena Semmler; Christian Grebmer; Tilko Reents; Sonia Ammar-Busch; Alessandra Buiatti; Felix Bourier; Isabel Deisenhofer; Christof Kolb
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 7.  Deep brain stimulation and electromagnetic interference.

Authors:  Shervin Rahimpour; Musa Kiyani; Sarah E Hodges; Dennis A Turner
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 1.876

Review 8.  Preventing and managing complications in dermatologic surgery: Procedural and postsurgical concerns.

Authors:  Allen G Strickler; Payal Shah; Shirin Bajaj; Richard Mizuguchi; Rajiv I Nijhawan; Mercy Odueyungbo; Anthony Rossi; Désirée Ratner
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 15.487

Review 9.  Perioperative Management of Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices and Utility of Magnet Application.

Authors:  Tardu Özkartal; Andrea Demarchi; Maria Luce Caputo; Enrico Baldi; Giulio Conte; Angelo Auricchio
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 10.  Anaesthetic consideration in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices scheduled for surgery.

Authors:  Murali Chakravarthy; Dattatreya Prabhakumar; Antony George
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2017-09
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.