Literature DB >> 22433333

Effect of surgical volume on outcomes for laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications.

Michelle R Wallenstein1, Cande V Ananth, Jin Hee Kim, William M Burke, Dawn L Hershman, Sharyn N Lewin, Alfred I Neugut, Yu-Shiang Lu, Thomas J Herzog, Jason D Wright.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the influence of surgical volume on outcome and resource utilization for laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications.
METHODS: Patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy from 2000 to 2010 and recorded in a commercial database were analyzed. Patients were stratified into tertiles according to the number of procedures performed by their surgeons and at their hospital. The influence of surgeon and hospital volume on perioperative morbidity and resource utilization was examined using multivariable regression models.
RESULTS: A total of 124,615 patients were identified. The overall complication rate decreased from 6.2% for low-volume surgeons to 4.2% for high-volume surgeons (P<.001). Patients operated on by high-volume surgeons were 25% (risk ratios [RRs] 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68-0.82) less likely to experience a complication. In multivariable models intraoperative complications, surgical-site complications, medical complications, prolonged hospitalization, and transfusion rates were lower for high-volume surgeons. Overall morbidity was 5.8% for women treated at low-volume hospitals compared with 4.7% at high-volume centers (P<.001). Women treated at high-volume centers were 18% (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.75-0.90) less likely to experience a complication. Procedure costs for high-volume surgeons were $867 lower than for low-volume surgeons, and treatment at a high-volume center reduced costs by $966 per procedure.
CONCLUSION: Performance of laparoscopic hysterectomy by high-volume surgeons and at high-volume hospitals is associated with modest reductions in morbidity and lower costs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22433333     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318248f7a8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  28 in total

1.  Safely Increase the Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Rate: A Novel Three-Tiered Preoperative Categorization System Can Predict the Difficulty for Benign Disease.

Authors:  Esteban Andryjowicz; Teresa B Wray; V Reinaldo Ruiz; James Rudolf; Sara Noroozkhani; Sandra Crowder; Jeff M Slezak
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2015-07-24

2.  Comparison of the outcomes for laparoscopic gastrectomy performed by the same surgeon between a low-volume hospital and a high-volume center.

Authors:  Min Gyu Kim; Sung Joon Kwon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Changes in Surgical Volume and Outcomes Over Time for Women Undergoing Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Maria P Ruiz; Ling Chen; Lisa R Gabor; Ana I Tergas; Caryn M St Clair; June Y Hou; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Use of guideline-based antibiotic prophylaxis in women undergoing gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Khalid Hassan; Cande V Ananth; Thomas J Herzog; Sharyn N Lewin; William M Burke; Yu-Shiang Lu; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Cost-Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Morcellation Compared With Abdominal Hysterectomy for Presumed Myomas.

Authors:  Sarah E Rutstein; Matthew T Siedhoff; Elizabeth J Geller; Kemi M Doll; Jennifer M Wu; Daniel L Clarke-Pearson; Stephanie B Wheeler
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 4.137

6.  Apical support at the time of hysterectomy for uterovaginal prolapse.

Authors:  Kelly L Kantartzis; Lindsay C Turner; Jonathan P Shepherd; Li Wang; Daniel G Winger; Jerry L Lowder
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Cost analysis of minimally invasive hysterectomy vs open approach performed by a single surgeon in an Italian center.

Authors:  Antonio Pellegrino; Gianluca Raffaello Damiani; Giorgio Fachechi; Silvia Corso; Cecilia Pirovano; Claudia Trio; Mario Villa; Daniela Turoli; Aly Youssef
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-07-26

8.  Laparoscopic hysterectomy with morcellation vs abdominal hysterectomy for presumed fibroids: an updated decision analysis following the 2014 Food and Drug Administration safety communications.

Authors:  Matthew T Siedhoff; Kemi M Doll; Daniel L Clarke-Pearson; Sarah E Rutstein
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Improving Patient Outcomes in Gynecology: The Role of Large Data Registries and Big Data Analytics.

Authors:  Elisabeth A Erekson; Cheryl B Iglesia
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 4.137

10.  Failure to rescue after major gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Cande V Ananth; Laureen Ojalvo; Thomas J Herzog; Sharyn N Lewin; Yu-Shiang Lu; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 8.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.