BACKGROUND: Daily suppression of herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) reduces plasma HIV-1 concentrations and modestly delayed HIV-1 disease progression in one clinical trial. We investigated the effect of daily suppressive aciclovir on HIV-1 disease progression in Rakai, Uganda. METHODS: We did a single site, parallel, randomised, controlled trial of HIV-1, HSV-2 dually infected adults with CD4 cell counts of 300-400 cells per μL. We excluded individuals who had an AIDS-defining illness or active genital ulcer disease, and those that were taking antiretroviral therapy. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) with computer-generated random numbers in blocks of four to receive either aciclovir 400 mg orally twice daily or placebo; participants were followed up for 24 months. All study staff and participants were masked to treatment, except for the two statisticians. The primary outcome was CD4 cell count less than 250 cells per μL or initiation of antiretroviral therapy for WHO stage 4 disease. Our intention-to-treat analysis used Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for baseline log(10) viral load, CD4 cell count, sex, and age to assess the risk of disease progression. We also investigated the effect of suppressive HSV-2 treatment stratified by baseline HIV viral load with a Cox proportional hazards model. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00405821. FINDINGS:440 participants were randomly assigned, 220 to each group. 110 participants in theplacebo group and 95 participants in the treatment group reached the primary endpoint (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·75, 95% CI 0·58-0·99; p=0·040). 24 participants in theplacebo group and 22 in the treatment group were censored, but all contributed data for the final analysis. In a subanalysis stratified by baseline HIV viral load, participants with a baseline viral load of 50,000 copies mL or more in the treatment group had a reduced HIV disease progression compared with those in the placebo group (0·62, 0·43-0·96; p=0·03). No significant difference in HIV disease progression existed between participants in the treatment group and those in the placebo group who had baseline HIV viral loads of less than 50,000 copies per mL (0·90, 0·54-1·5; p=0·688). No safety issues related to aciclovir treatment were identified. INTERPRETATION:Aciclovir reduces the rate of disease progression, with the greatest effect in individuals with a high baseline viral load. Suppressive aciclovir might be warranted for individuals dually infected with HSV-2 and HIV-1 with viral loads of 50,000 copies per mL or more before initiation of antiretroviral treatment. FUNDING: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Cancer Institute (National Institutes of Health, USA).
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Daily suppression of herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) reduces plasma HIV-1 concentrations and modestly delayed HIV-1 disease progression in one clinical trial. We investigated the effect of daily suppressive aciclovir on HIV-1 disease progression in Rakai, Uganda. METHODS: We did a single site, parallel, randomised, controlled trial of HIV-1, HSV-2 dually infected adults with CD4 cell counts of 300-400 cells per μL. We excluded individuals who had an AIDS-defining illness or active genital ulcer disease, and those that were taking antiretroviral therapy. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) with computer-generated random numbers in blocks of four to receive either aciclovir 400 mg orally twice daily or placebo; participants were followed up for 24 months. All study staff and participants were masked to treatment, except for the two statisticians. The primary outcome was CD4 cell count less than 250 cells per μL or initiation of antiretroviral therapy for WHO stage 4 disease. Our intention-to-treat analysis used Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for baseline log(10) viral load, CD4 cell count, sex, and age to assess the risk of disease progression. We also investigated the effect of suppressive HSV-2 treatment stratified by baseline HIV viral load with a Cox proportional hazards model. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00405821. FINDINGS: 440 participants were randomly assigned, 220 to each group. 110 participants in the placebo group and 95 participants in the treatment group reached the primary endpoint (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·75, 95% CI 0·58-0·99; p=0·040). 24 participants in the placebo group and 22 in the treatment group were censored, but all contributed data for the final analysis. In a subanalysis stratified by baseline HIV viral load, participants with a baseline viral load of 50,000 copies mL or more in the treatment group had a reduced HIV disease progression compared with those in the placebo group (0·62, 0·43-0·96; p=0·03). No significant difference in HIV disease progression existed between participants in the treatment group and those in the placebo group who had baseline HIV viral loads of less than 50,000 copies per mL (0·90, 0·54-1·5; p=0·688). No safety issues related to aciclovir treatment were identified. INTERPRETATION:Aciclovir reduces the rate of disease progression, with the greatest effect in individuals with a high baseline viral load. Suppressive aciclovir might be warranted for individuals dually infected with HSV-2 and HIV-1 with viral loads of 50,000 copies per mL or more before initiation of antiretroviral treatment. FUNDING: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Cancer Institute (National Institutes of Health, USA).
Authors: R Scott McClelland; Chia C Wang; Julie Overbaugh; Barbra A Richardson; Lawrence Corey; Rhoda L Ashley; Kishorchandra Mandaliya; Jeckoniah Ndinya-Achola; Job J Bwayo; Joan K Kreiss Journal: AIDS Date: 2002-12-06 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: S Jurriaans; B Van Gemen; G J Weverling; D Van Strijp; P Nara; R Coutinho; M Koot; H Schuitemaker; J Goudsmit Journal: Virology Date: 1994-10 Impact factor: 3.616
Authors: S M Hammer; D A Katzenstein; M D Hughes; H Gundacker; R T Schooley; R H Haubrich; W K Henry; M M Lederman; J P Phair; M Niu; M S Hirsch; T C Merigan Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1996-10-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Oliver Laeyendecker; Charla Henson; Ronald H Gray; Ruby H-N Nguyen; Bobbi Jo Horne; Maria J Wawer; David Serwadda; Noah Kiwanuka; Rhoda Ashley Morrow; Wayne Hogrefe; Thomas C Quinn Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Sara Gianella; Andrew D Redd; Mary K Grabowski; Aaron A R Tobian; David Serwadda; Kevin Newell; Eshan U Patel; Sarah Kalibbala; Paschal Ssebbowa; Ronald H Gray; Thomas C Quinn; Steven J Reynolds Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2015-03-05 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Christophe Vanpouille; Andrea Lisco; Jean-Charles Grivel; Leda C Bassit; Robert C Kauffman; Jorge Sanchez; Raymond F Schinazi; Michael M Lederman; Benigno Rodriguez; Leonid Margolis Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2015-03-03 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Laura D Sander; Kevin Newell; Paschal Ssebbowa; David Serwadda; Thomas C Quinn; Ronald H Gray; Maria J Wawer; George Mondo; Steven Reynolds Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2014-12-26 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Supriya D Mehta; Stephen Moses; Kawango Agot; Ian Maclean; Elijah Odoyo-June; Hong Li; Robert C Bailey Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2013-07-30 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Aaron A R Tobian; Mary K Grabowski; David Serwadda; Kevin Newell; Paschal Ssebbowa; Veronica Franco; Fred Nalugoda; Maria J Wawer; Ronald H Gray; Thomas C Quinn; Steven J Reynolds Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2013-06-28 Impact factor: 5.226