Literature DB >> 22432739

Multicenter experience with transvenous lead extraction of active fixation coronary sinus leads.

Melanie Maytin1, Roger G Carrillo, Pablo Baltodano, Raymond H M Schaerf, Maria G Bongiorni, Andrea Di Cori, Antonio Curnis, Joshua M Cooper, Charles Kennergren, Laurence M Epstein.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
OBJECTIVE: Active fixation coronary sinus (CS) leads limit dislodgement and represent an attractive option to the implanter. Although extraction of passive fixation CS leads is a common and frequently uncomplicated procedure, data regarding extraction of chronically implanted active fixation CS leads are limited.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing active fixation CS lead extraction at six centers. Patient and procedural characteristics, indications for extraction, use of extraction sheath (ES) assistance, and outcomes are reported.
RESULTS: Between January 2009 and February 2011, 12 patients underwent transvenous lead extraction (TLE) of Medtronic StarFix® lead (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). The cohort was 83% male with mean age 71 ± 14 years. Average implant duration was 14.2 ± 5.7 months (2.3-23.6). All leads but one were removed for infectious indications (67% systemic infection). At the time of explant, the fixation lobes were completely retracted in only one of the 12 cases and ES assistance was required for lead removal in all cases (58% laser, 25% cutting, 25% mechanical, and 25% femoral). The majority of cases required advancement of the sheath into the CS (75.0%) and often into a branch vessel (41.7%). One lead could not be removed transvenously and required surgical lead extraction. There were no major complications. Examination of the leads after extraction frequently revealed significant tissue growth into the fixation lobes.
CONCLUSIONS: Although TLE of active fixation CS leads can be a safe procedure in select patients and experienced hands, powered sheaths and aggressive techniques are frequently required for successful removal despite relatively short implant durations. This raises significant concern regarding future TLE of active fixation CS leads with longer implant durations. ©2012, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22432739     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2012.03353.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  11 in total

Review 1.  Considerations for cardiac device lead extraction.

Authors:  Oussama Wazni; Bruce L Wilkoff
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  [Laser sheath extraction of an infected pacemaker lead].

Authors:  Hamdi ElFarra; Rainer Moosdorf; Thomas Kratz; Wolfram Grimm
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2013-06-14

3.  Starfix lead extraction: Clinical experience and technical issues.

Authors:  Pier Giorgio Golzio; Ilaria Meynet; Fulvio Orzan; Elisa Pellissero; Davide Castagno; Federico Ferraris; Fiorenzo Gaita
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2015-11-14

4.  Snare sheath versus evolution sheath in transvenous lead extraction.

Authors:  Jihua Kong; Yilun Tian; Fei Guo; Feng Ze; Jiangbo Duan; Long Wang; Xuebin Li; Jihong Guo
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-15

5.  First experience in quadripolar active fixation coronary sinus lead extraction: a case report.

Authors:  Elhosseyn Guella; Michael Brack; Khalid Abozguia; Christopher John Cassidy
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2020-07-22

6.  Editorial: What makes transvenous extraction more difficult?

Authors:  Hideo Okamura
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2015-12-04

7.  Safety and effectiveness of coronary sinus leads extraction - single high-volume centre experience.

Authors:  Andrzej W Kutarski; Wojciech Jacheć; Łukasz Tułecki; Konrad Tomków; Paweł Stefańczyk; Wojciech Borzęcki; Dorota Nowosielecka; Marek Czajkowski; Maciej Polewczyk; Anna Polewczyk
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 1.426

8.  An active fixation quadripolar left ventricular lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy with reduced postoperative complication rates.

Authors:  Calum Robertson; Owen Duffey; Pok-Tin Tang; Natalie Fairhurst; Cristiana Monteiro; Peregrine Green; Joanna Grogono; Mark Davies; Andrew Lewis; Rohan Wijesurendra; Julian Ormerod; James Gamble; Matthew Ginks; Kim Rajappan; Yaver Bashir; Tim R Betts; Neil Herring
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Coronary Sinus Lead Removal: A Comparison between Active and Passive Fixation Leads.

Authors:  Simon Pecha; Charles Kennergren; Yalin Yildirim; Nils Gosau; Ali Aydin; Stephan Willems; Hendrik Treede; Hermann Reichenspurner; Samer Hakmi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Multi-site multi-polar left ventricular pacing through persistent left superior vena cava in tricuspid valve disease.

Authors:  Ernest W Lau
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2017-05-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.