Literature DB >> 22431446

6 cmH2O continuous positive airway pressure versus conventional oxygen therapy in severe viral bronchiolitis: a randomized trial.

Christophe Milési1, Stefan Matecki, Samir Jaber, Thibaut Mura, Aurélien Jacquot, Odile Pidoux, Nathalie Chautemps, Aline Rideau Batista Novais, Clémentine Combes, Jean-Charles Picaud, Gilles Cambonie.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) and conventional oxygen therapy on the clinical signs of respiratory distress and the respiratory muscle workload in acute viral bronchiolitis.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, monocentric study carried out in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Infants <6 months old, admitted to the PICU with severe respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis. INTERVENTION: The patients were randomized into two groups for 6 hr. The nCPAP group (n = 10) received 6 cmH(2)O pressure support delivered by a jet flow generator and the control group (n = 9) received an air/oxygen mixture from a heated humidifier. Respiratory distress was assessed by the modified Wood's clinical asthma score (m-WCAS), and inspiratory muscle work was evaluated by calculating the pressure-time product per breath (PTP(insp) /breath) and per minute (PTP(insp) /min) from the esophageal pressure (Pes) recordings.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Compared with control condition, nCPAP decreased m-WCAS [-2.4 (1.05) vs. -0.5 (1.3), P = 0.03], PTPes(insp)/breath [-9.7 (5.7) vs. -1.4 (8.2), P = 0.04], PTPes(insp) /min [-666 (402) vs. -116 (352), P = 0.015], and FiO(2) [-7 (10) vs. +5 (15), P = 0.05]. Significant worsening of m-WCAS was only observed in the control group (4/9 vs. 0/10, P = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: nCPAP rapidly decreased inspiratory work in young infants with acute bronchiolitis. Improvement in the respiratory distress score at 6 hr was proportional to the initial clinical severity, suggesting the importance of rapid nCPAP initiation in the more severe forms of the disease.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22431446     DOI: 10.1002/ppul.22533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol        ISSN: 1099-0496


  20 in total

1.  High flow on the rise-pediatric perspectives on the FLORALI trial.

Authors:  Christophe Milési; Julien Baleine; Julia le Bouhellec; Marti Pons-Odena; Gilles Cambonie
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  High-Flow Nasal Cannula versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Critical Bronchiolitis: A Randomized Controlled Pilot.

Authors:  Regina Grigolli Cesar; Bibiane Ramos Pinheiro Bispo; Priscilla Helena Costa Alves Felix; Maria Carolina Caparica Modolo; Andreia Aparecida Freitas Souza; Nelson K Horigoshi; Alexandre T Rotta
Journal:  J Pediatr Intensive Care       Date:  2020-04-17

3.  High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) for the initial respiratory management of acute viral bronchiolitis in young infants: a multicenter randomized controlled trial (TRAMONTANE study).

Authors:  Christophe Milési; Sandrine Essouri; Robin Pouyau; Jean-Michel Liet; Mickael Afanetti; Aurélie Portefaix; Julien Baleine; Sabine Durand; Clémentine Combes; Aymeric Douillard; Gilles Cambonie
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for acute bronchiolitis in children.

Authors:  Kana R Jat; Jeanne M Dsouza; Joseph L Mathew
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-04-04

5.  Comparison of a high-flow humidified nasal cannula to nasal continuous positive airway pressure in children with acute bronchiolitis: experience in a pediatric intensive care unit.

Authors:  Prune Metge; Céline Grimaldi; Sophie Hassid; Laurent Thomachot; Anderson Loundou; Claude Martin; Fabrice Michel
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 3.183

6.  Is treatment with a high flow nasal cannula effective in acute viral bronchiolitis? A physiologic study.

Authors:  Christophe Milési; Julien Baleine; Stefan Matecki; Sabine Durand; Clémentine Combes; Aline Rideau Batista Novais; Gilles Cambonie; Gilles Combonie
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  The change in management of bronchiolitis in the intensive care unit between 2000 and 2015.

Authors:  Minna Mecklin; Paula Heikkilä; Matti Korppi
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 3.183

8.  A multicenter randomized controlled trial of a 3-L/kg/min versus 2-L/kg/min high-flow nasal cannula flow rate in young infants with severe viral bronchiolitis (TRAMONTANE 2).

Authors:  Christophe Milési; Anne-Florence Pierre; Anna Deho; Robin Pouyau; Jean-Michel Liet; Camille Guillot; Anne-Sophie Guilbert; Jérôme Rambaud; Astrid Millet; Mickael Afanetti; Julie Guichoux; Mathieu Genuini; Thierry Mansir; Jean Bergounioux; Fabrice Michel; Marie-Odile Marcoux; Julien Baleine; Sabine Durand; Philippe Durand; Stéphane Dauger; Etienne Javouhey; Stéphane Leteurtre; Olivier Brissaud; Sylvain Renolleau; Aurélie Portefaix; Aymeric Douillard; Gilles Cambonie
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-10-21       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Optimal level of positive end-expiratory pressure during nasal continuous airway pressure for severe bronchiolitis: a prospective study.

Authors:  Lijuan Yin; Linwei Li; Donghong Peng; Wei Chen
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2021-07

10.  Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for acute bronchiolitis in children.

Authors:  Kana R Jat; Joseph L Mathew
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-01-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.