Literature DB >> 22431302

Preclosure of large-sized venous access sites in adults undergoing transcatheter structural interventions.

Tahir Hamid1, Rajinikanth Rajagopal, Charlene Pius, Bernard Clarke, Vaikom S Mahadevan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients requiring congenital and structural heart interventions often require large-sized sheath insertion into femoral veins and arteries. Clinical outcome data on the use of suture-mediated devices for femoral venous access site closure are limited.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of the Perclose™ (Abbott Vascular Devices, CA) suture-mediated device using the preclosure technique, in achieving haemostasis at femoral venous access site following large sheath insertion (≥8 Fr). DESIGN AND
SETTING: Two hundred and forty-three consecutive patients underwent 310 access site closures with the Perclose™ device using the preclosure technique. There were 151 (62%) women, mean age 43 (±16) years. 234/243 (96%) received heparin. Mean venous access site sheath diameter was 11.5 (±3) Fr.
RESULTS: Immediate haemostasis (<2 min) was achieved in 304/310 (98%) sites. No patients had major complications. Short-term follow-up at 3 months revealed no evidence of haematoma or fistula formation or clinical evidence of vessel occlusion. On medium-term clinical follow-up (mean follow-up of 14 ± 12 and median of 12.4 months), no complications were seen at the venous access sites.
CONCLUSION: Preclosure of large-size femoral venous access sheath sites using the suture-mediated Perclose™ device is efficacious in achieving rapid haemostasis in the presence of anticoagulation in the venous site. On 1-year follow-up, there was no clinical evidence of vascular complications in the venous access sites.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22431302     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.24358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  5 in total

1.  Use of vascular closure device is safe and effective in electrophysiological procedures.

Authors:  Ilir Maraj; Adam S Budzikowski; Waleed Ali; Crisitina A Mitre; John Kassotis
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Venous hemostasis postcatheter ablation of atrial fibrillation while under therapeutic levels of oral and intravenous anticoagulation.

Authors:  Ziad F Issa; Bashar S Amr
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Comparative outcomes of vascular access closure methods following atrial fibrillation/flutter catheter ablation: insights from VAscular Closure for Cardiac Ablation Registry.

Authors:  Moghniuddin Mohammed; Rigoberto Ramirez; Daniel A Steinhaus; Omair K Yousuf; Michael J Giocondo; Brian M Ramza; Alan P Wimmer; Sanjaya K Gupta
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 1.759

4.  Pre-closure of Large-Sized Arterial Access Sites in Adults Undergoing Transcatheter Structural Interventions.

Authors:  Tahir Hamid; Tawfiq R Choudhury; Bernard Clarke; Vaikom S Mahadevan
Journal:  Cardiol Ther       Date:  2014-12-23

5.  Preclosure technique versus arterial cutdown after percutaneous cannulation for venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Abhimanyu Chandel; Mehul Desai; Liam P Ryan; Lindsay Clevenger; Alan M Speir; Ramesh Singh
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2021-08-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.