Literature DB >> 22429947

A new vibroplasty coupling technique as a treatment for conductive and mixed hearing losses: a report of 4 cases.

Alexander M Huber1, Robert Mlynski, Joachim Müller, Norbert Dillier, David Holzmann, Mario D Wolframm, Rudolf Hagen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to report on experiences regarding the safety and efficacy of the Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) using a floating mass transducer (FMT)-partial/total ossicular replacement prosthesis (PORP/TORP) assembly as a treatment for conductive and mixed hearing losses of mild-to-moderate/severe degree. The secondary objective was to gather information regarding device fitting, as well as to refine surgical procedures. PATIENTS: Five German-speaking adults from 2 European study sites were implanted with a VSB using an FMT-PORP/TORP assembly and evaluated before and after surgery for air-and bone-conduction thresholds and speech recognition performance. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Evaluating the safety and efficacy of the VSB in combination with a PORP or TORP to treat conductive and mixed hearing loss.
RESULTS: Residual cochlear hearing was unaffected by implantation with the device. Functional gain (measured as the difference between preoperative unaided and postoperative VSB-aided thresholds) could be calculated in 2 of 5 subjects, demonstrating that the VSB is effective in treating bone-conduction hearing losses of moderate/severe degree. Word recognition tests in quiet and noise showed good improvement in 3 of the cases. One patient experienced several other medical problems, making her audiological outcomes limited. One patient was excluded from the study owing to insufficient benefit and subsequently underwent revision surgery with FMT placement at the round window.
CONCLUSION: The use of the VSB, implanted using the FMT-PORP/TORP assembly, was safe in all and efficacious in 3 of the 5 cases in this study. These are patients who may have few, if any, other options to manage their hearing loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22429947     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31824bae6e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  5 in total

1.  Presentation of floating mass transducer and Vibroplasty couplers on CT and cone beam CT.

Authors:  Robert Mlynski; Thi Dao Nguyen; Stefan K Plontke; Sabrina Kösling
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Hearing rehabilitation with single-stage bilateral vibroplasty in a child with Franceschetti syndrome.

Authors:  Sona Sargsyan; Torsten Rahne; Sabrina Kösling; Gerburg Eichler; Stefan K Plontke
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Importance of adhesiolysis in revision surgery for vibrant soundbridge device failures at the short incus process.

Authors:  Yoon Ah Park; Tae Hoon Kong; Jin Soon Chang; Young Joon Seo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  ACTIVE MIDDLE EAR VIBRANT SOUNDBRIDGE SOUND IMPLANT.

Authors:  Alan Pegan; Mihael Ries; Jakov Ajduk; Vladimir Bedeković; Mirko Ivkić; Robert Trotić
Journal:  Acta Clin Croat       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 0.780

5.  Active Middle Ear Implant Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Intensity-Latency Characteristics.

Authors:  Laura Fröhlich; Alexander Müller; Miriam H Kropp; Parwis Mir-Salim; Oliver Dziemba; Tobias Oberhoffner; Stefan K Plontke; Torsten Rahne
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.003

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.