Literature DB >> 22429299

Histologic work-up of non-palpable breast lesions classified as probably benign at initial mammography and/or ultrasound (BI-RADS category 3).

R Gruber1, S Jaromi, M Rudas, G Pfarl, C C Riedl, D Flöry, O Graf, E A Sickles, T H Helbich.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of a probably benign assessment of non-palpable breast lesions (BI-RADS category 3) at mammography and/or ultrasound with immediate histological work-up.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Stereotactic or ultrasound guided core needle breast biopsy (NBB) was performed to evaluate 288 lesions, which were prospectively assessed as BI-RADS category 3. Imaging findings included 195 masses, 73 calcification cases, 16 focal asymmetries, and four architectural distortion cases. After NBB, patients underwent either open surgical biopsy (OSB) (n=204) or mammographic follow-up (n=84) for at least 24 months. Histological results of NBB were compared with those of OSB.
RESULTS: Three of the 288 lesions (1.0%) proved to be malignant at histological work-up, two of them were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and one of them was an invasive carcinoma. NBB revealed invasive carcinoma in 1/288 (0.35%) and atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) in 13/288 (4.5%) lesions. OSB revealed DCIS in 2/204 (1%) and invasive carcinoma in 1/204 (0.5%) lesions. The two DCIS were underestimated as ADH by NBB. The remaining 285 (99%) lesions proved to be benign at OSB or remained stable during follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Confirmed by tissue diagnosis, the low likelihood of malignancy of prospectively assessed probably benign lesions is below the 2% threshold established for BI-RADS category 3. Imaging follow-up is a safe and effective alternative to immediate histological work-up for such lesions.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22429299     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  6 in total

1.  Management for BI-RADS category 3 lesions detected in preoperative breast MR imaging of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Hye Mi Gweon; Nariya Cho; Soo-Yeon Kim; Hye Ryoung Koo; Mirinae Seo; Ajung Chu; Eun Ju Son
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Diagnostic workup and costs of a single supplemental molecular breast imaging screen of mammographically dense breasts.

Authors:  Carrie B Hruska; Amy Lynn Conners; Katie N Jones; Michael K O'Connor; James P Moriarty; Judy C Boughey; Deborah J Rhodes
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Quantitative ultrasound analysis for classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast masses.

Authors:  Woo Kyung Moon; Chung-Ming Lo; Jung Min Chang; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Jeon-Hor Chen; Ruey-Feng Chang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Triple-modality screening trial for familial breast cancer underlines the importance of magnetic resonance imaging and questions the role of mammography and ultrasound regardless of patient mutation status, age, and breast density.

Authors:  Christopher C Riedl; Nikolaus Luft; Clemens Bernhart; Michael Weber; Maria Bernathova; Muy-Kheng M Tea; Margaretha Rudas; Christian F Singer; Thomas H Helbich
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Virtual Touch IQ elastography reduces unnecessary breast biopsies by applying quantitative "rule-in" and "rule-out" threshold values.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kapetas; Paola Clauser; Ramona Woitek; Katja Pinker; Maria Bernathova; Thomas H Helbich; Pascal A Baltzer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Follow-Up Intervals for Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 Lesions on Screening Ultrasound in Screening and Tertiary Referral Centers.

Authors:  Sun Huh; Hee Jung Suh; Eun Kyung Kim; Min Jung Kim; Jung Hyun Yoon; Vivian Youngjean Park; Hee Jung Moon
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 3.500

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.