Literature DB >> 22429174

Factors influencing residents' evaluations of clinical faculty member teaching qualities and role model status.

Onyebuchi A Arah1, Maas J Heineman, Kiki M J M H Lombarts.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Evaluations of faculty members are widely used to identify excellent or substandard teaching performance. In order to enable such evaluations to be properly interpreted and used in faculty development, it is essential to understand the factors that influence resident doctors' (residents) evaluations of the teaching qualities of faculty members and their perceptions of faculty members as role-model specialists.
METHODS: We carried out a cross-sectional survey within a longitudinal study of the System for Evaluation of Teaching Qualities (SETQ) of clinical teachers. The study sample included 889 residents and 1014 faculty members in 61 teaching programmes spanning 22 specialties in 20 hospitals in the Netherlands. Main outcome measures included residents' (i) global and (ii) specific ratings of faculty member teaching qualities, and (iii) global ratings of faculty members as role-model specialists. Statistical analysis was conducted using adjusted multivariable logistic generalised estimating equations.
RESULTS: In total, 690 residents (77.6%) completed 6485 evaluations of 962 faculty members, 848 (83.6%) of whom also self-evaluated. More recently certified faculty members, those who had attended a teacher training programme, and those who spent more time teaching than seeing patients or conducting research were more likely to score highly on most teaching qualities. However, faculty members who had undergone teacher training were less likely to be seen as role models (odds ratio [OR] 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.88). In addition, faculty members were evaluated slightly higher by male than female residents on core teaching domains and overall teaching quality, but were less likely to be seen as role models by male residents (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.67-0.97). Lastly, faculty members had higher odds of receiving top scores in specific teaching domains from residents in the first 4 years of residency and were less likely to be considered as role models by more senior residents.
CONCLUSIONS: Younger faculty members who dedicated more time to teaching, had attended a teacher training programme, and were evaluated by male residents in the early years of residency were more likely to receive higher scores for teaching performance. © Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2012.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22429174     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04176.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  18 in total

1.  Predictive Relationships Between Students' Evaluation Ratings and Course Satisfaction.

Authors:  Catherine B Terry; Keri L Heitner; Leslie A Miller; Clea Hollis
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Residents' engagement and empathy associated with their perception of faculty's teaching performance.

Authors:  S S Lenny Lases; Onyebuchi A Arah; E G J M Robert Pierik; Erik Heineman; M J M H Kiki Lombarts
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Training satisfaction and work environment in Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck surgery: a comparison between France and Germany.

Authors:  Natalie Oker; Virginie Escabasse; Helge Pensky; Naif Alotaibi; Andre Coste; Andreas E Albers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Gendered Expectations: the Impact of Gender, Evaluation Language, and Clinical Setting on Resident Trainee Assessment of Faculty Performance.

Authors:  Virginia Sheffield; Sarah Hartley; R Brent Stansfield; Megan Mack; Staci Blackburn; Valerie M Vaughn; Lauren Heidemann; Robert Chang; Jennifer Reilly Lukela
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Creating work environments where people of all genders in gynecologic oncology can thrive: An SGO evidence-based review.

Authors:  S M Temkin; E Chapman-Davis; N Nair; D E Cohn; J F Hines; E C Kohn; S V Blank
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 5.304

6.  The teacher, the physician and the person: how faculty's teaching performance influences their role modelling.

Authors:  Benjamin C M Boerebach; Kiki M J M H Lombarts; Christiaan Keijzer; Maas Jan Heineman; Onyebuchi A Arah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Confounding factors in using upward feedback to assess the quality of medical training: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anli Yue Zhou; Paul Baker
Journal:  J Educ Eval Health Prof       Date:  2014-08-13

8.  Hospitalist workload influences faculty evaluations by internal medicine clerkship students.

Authors:  Robert L Robinson
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2015-02-10

9.  Qualitative study about the ways teachers react to feedback from resident evaluations.

Authors:  Thea van Roermund; Marie-Louise Schreurs; Henk Mokkink; Ben Bottema; Albert Scherpbier; Chris van Weel
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  The teacher, the physician and the person: exploring causal connections between teaching performance and role model types using directed acyclic graphs.

Authors:  Benjamin C M Boerebach; Kiki M J M H Lombarts; Albert J J Scherpbier; Onyebuchi A Arah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.