Literature DB >> 22428692

Too much of a good thing?

Brenda E Sirovich1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2012        PMID： 22428692      PMCID： PMC3385019          DOI： 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00654.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Milbank Q        ISSN： 0887-378X            Impact factor:   4.911


× No keyword cloud information.
  9 in total

1.  Too Little? Too Much? Primary care physicians' views on US health care: a brief report.

Authors:  Brenda E Sirovich; Steven Woloshin; Lisa M Schwartz
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-09-26

2.  Screening mammography--a long run for a short slide?

Authors:  H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Cervical-cancer screening--new guidelines and the balance between benefits and harms.

Authors:  George F Sawaya
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  ACOG Practice Bulletin no. 109: Cervical cytology screening.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Screening for squamous cervical cancer: duration of low risk after negative results of cervical cytology and its implication for screening policies. IARC Working Group on evaluation of cervical cancer screening programmes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-09-13

6.  Cervical cancer mortality in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Y van der Graaf; G A Zielhuis; G P Vooijs
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Cancer statistics, 2010.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Jiaquan Xu; Elizabeth Ward
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Report from the CDC. Pap test intervals used by physicians serving low-income women through the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.

Authors:  Crystale Purvis Cooper; Mona Saraiya; Teresa Abend McLean; Judy Hannan; Jaime M Liesmann; Shyanika Wijesinha Rose; Herschel W Lawson
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  Risk of cervical cancer associated with extending the interval between cervical-cancer screenings.

Authors:  George F Sawaya; K John McConnell; Shalini L Kulasingam; Herschel W Lawson; Karla Kerlikowske; Joy Melnikow; Nancy C Lee; Ginny Gildengorin; Evan R Myers; A Eugene Washington
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-10-16       Impact factor: 91.245
  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Cervical carcinoma rates among young females in the United States.

Authors:  Vicki B Benard; Meg Watson; Philip E Castle; Mona Saraiya
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 7.661
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.