Literature DB >> 22425914

Clinical utility of the pretreatment glasgow prognostic score in patients with advanced inoperable non-small cell lung cancer.

Elaine Y L Leung1, Hazel R Scott, Donald C McMillan.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Traditional tumor-based staging systems provide limited information on the best treatment option for individual patients with advanced inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) reflects the host systemic inflammatory response and is a validated independent prognostic factor in these patients. The aim of this study was to examine the clinical application of the pretreatment GPS in a mature cohort of patients with inoperable NSCLC.
METHODS: The data of 261 patients with inoperable NSCLC were collected prospectively and before treatment. Information on patient demographics, body mass index, performance status (PS), the modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), the prognostic index, and treatment received were included.
RESULTS: The majority of patients were aged 65 years or older (68%), were men (59%), had a body mass index more than 20 (89%), and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) 0 or 1 (54%). Most patients had a pretreatment mGPS = 1 (62%) and pretreatment prognostic index = 1 (56%). During the follow-up period, 248 (95%) patients died, 246 from their disease. The median survival was 8 months. On multivariate analysis, age (p = 0.001), ECOG-PS (p < 0.05), mGPS (p < 0.0001), and tumor stage (p < 0.0001) were independently associated with cancer-specific survival. Using 5-year cancer-specific mortality as an end point, the area under the receiver operator curve was 0.735 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.566-0.903; p = 0.024) for the mGPS, 0.669 (95% CI, 0.489-0.848; p = 0.106) for ECOG-PS, and 0.622 (95% CI, 0.437-0.807; p = 0.240) for tumor, node, metastasis stage. Patients with an increased mGPS were more likely to have a poorer ECOG-PS (p < 0.05), an increased white cell count (p < 0.05), and received palliative treatment (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The pretreatment mGPS is a useful and important predictor of cancer-specific survival in patients with inoperable NSCLC. Basing clinical assessment on the mGPS has implications for the routine monitoring and treatment of the patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22425914     DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318244ffe1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Oncol        ISSN: 1556-0864            Impact factor:   15.609


  45 in total

1.  Body mass index and mortality in lung cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  J Wang; H Xu; S Zhou; D Wang; L Zhu; J Hou; J Tang; J Zhao; S Zhong
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Comparison of Glasgow prognostic score and prognostic index in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Ai-Gui Jiang; Hong-Lin Chen; Hui-Yu Lu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  A systemic inflammation-based prognostic scores (mGPS) predicts overall survival of patients with small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Ting Zhou; Shaodong Hong; Zhihuang Hu; Xue Hou; Yan Huang; Hongyun Zhao; Wenhua Liang; Yuanyuan Zhao; Wenfeng Fang; Xuan Wu; Tao Qin; Li Zhang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-09-26

4.  Prognostic factors in patients with skeletal-related events at non-small-cell lung cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Tominaga; Takao Setoguchi; Hirofumi Shimada; Satoshi Nagano; Hiromi Sasaki; Yasuhiro Ishidou; Masami Sato; Keiko Mizuno; Hiromasa Inoue; Setsuro Komiya
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-08-25

5.  Comparison of the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) and the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) in evaluating the prognosis of patients with operable and inoperable non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Heng Fan; Zhen-Yi Shao; Yuan-Yuan Xiao; Zhi-Hui Xie; Wen Chen; Hua Xie; Guo-You Qin; Nai-Qing Zhao
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Serum albumin as a significant prognostic factor in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Zhou-Hong Yao; Guang-Yan Tian; Shao-Xiang Yang; Yun-Yan Wan; Yan-Meng Kang; Qing-Hua Liu; Fei Yao; Dian-Jie Lin
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-04-15

7.  Prognostic value of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in lung cancer patients receiving immunotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Haoyu Wang; Cui Li; Ruiyuan Yang; Jing Jin; Dan Liu; Weimin Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Simple and Objective Prediction of Survival in Patients with Lung Cancer: Staging the Host Systemic Inflammatory Response.

Authors:  Derek Grose; Graham Devereux; Louise Brown; Richard Jones; Dave Sharma; Colin Selby; David S Morrison; Kirsty Docherty; David McIntosh; Penny McElhinney; Marianne Nicolson; Donald C McMillan; Robert Milroy
Journal:  Lung Cancer Int       Date:  2014-03-05

9.  The clinical relevance of laboratory prognostic scores for patients with radiosurgically treated brain metastases of non-pulmonary primary tumor.

Authors:  Anna Cho; Helena Untersteiner; Fabian Fitschek; Farjad Khalaveh; Philip Pruckner; Noemi Pavo; Karl Rössler; Christian Dorfer; Brigitte Gatterbauer; Christoph Höller; Manuela Schmidinger; Josa M Frischer
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2021-06-20       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  The relationship between Glasgow Prognostic Score and serum tumor markers in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Ai-Gui Jiang; Hong-Lin Chen; Hui-Yu Lu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.