Literature DB >> 22425890

Cervical laminectomy width and spinal cord drift are risk factors for postoperative C5 palsy.

Kris E Radcliff1, Worawat Limthongkul, Chris K Kepler, Gursukhman D S Sidhu, D Greg Anderson, Jeffrey A Rihn, Alan S Hilibrand, Alexander R Vaccaro, Todd J Albert.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cervical laminectomy and fusion (CLF) is a treatment option for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Postoperative C5 nerve palsy is a possible complication of CLF. It has been suggested that C5 nerve palsy may be due to posterior drift of the spinal cord related to a wide laminectomy trough.
PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that excessive spinal cord drift into a wide laminectomy trough is associated with C5 palsy. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Seventeen patients with C5 palsy, 8 patients as control group. OUTCOME MEASURES: Spinal cord positional measurements on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
METHODS: All patients who underwent elective CLF for cervical spondylotic myelopathy or ossified posterior longitudinal ligament using posterior instrumentation between 2004 and 2008 were included. Patients who underwent CLF for trauma, infection, or tumors were excluded. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were assessed by chart review (minimum of 1 y follow-up). Patients who developed a new postoperative C5 nerve palsy underwent repeat MRI. The control group also underwent CLF, did not develop a neurological deficit, and received a postoperative MRI for evaluation of possible infection. MRI measurements included the width of the laminectomy trough, the distance from the posterior vertebral body or disk to the anterior spinal cord, the width of the spinal cord herniated into the laminectomy defect, and C2-7 sagittal alignment. Preoperative radiographic measurements included preoperative vertebral body diameter, spinal canal diameter, and sagittal vertical offset.
RESULTS: There were seventeen patients with C5 nerve root palsy and 8 patients without C5 nerve root palsy. There were no baseline differences in fusion levels, instrumentation used, patient age, or sex. MRI measurements revealed an increase in mean postoperative cord drift in patients with C5 palsy at C3 (4.2 vs. 2.2 mm, P=0.002), C4 (4.6 vs. 2.8 mm, P=0.056), C5 (5.1 vs. 2.4 mm, P=0.011), and C6 (5.2 vs. 2.4 mm, P=0.003). There was a significant increase in C5 laminectomy trough width among patients with postoperative C5 palsy (17.9 vs. 15.2 mm, P=0.032), but there was no difference in sagittal alignment.
CONCLUSIONS: A wider laminectomy at C5 was associated with an increased risk of postoperative C5 palsy. Increased preoperative spinal canal diameter is also associated with increased risk of C5 palsy. In addition, patients who experienced C5 nerve palsy had a significantly greater posterior spinal cord drift. Strategies to reduce postoperative laminectomy trough width and spinal cord drift may reduce the risk of postoperative C5 palsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 22425890     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31824e53af

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  24 in total

Review 1.  Cervical laminectomy and instrumented lateral mass fusion: techniques, pearls and pitfalls.

Authors:  Michael Mayer; Oliver Meier; Alexander Auffarth; Heiko Koller
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Cervical laminectomy of limited width prevents postoperative C5 palsy: a multivariate analysis of 263 muscle-preserving posterior decompression cases.

Authors:  Satoshi Nori; Ryoma Aoyama; Ken Ninomiya; Junichi Yamane; Kazuya Kitamura; Seiji Ueda; Tateru Shiraishi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  30-Day unplanned surgery in cervical spondylotic myelopathy surgically treated: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Xavier Plano; Manuel Ramírez; Antonia Matamalas; Sleiman Haddad; Ana García de Frutos; J M Casamitjana; Ferran Pellisé
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-02-23       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Does intramedullary signal intensity on MRI affect the surgical outcomes of patients with ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament?

Authors:  Jae Hyuk Choi; Jun Jae Shin; Tae Hong Kim; Hyung Shik Shin; Yong Soon Hwang; Sang Keun Park
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2014-08-31

5.  Laminoplasty and simultaneous C2 semi-laminectomy with internal fixation in treating ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in cervical discs at C2 segment.

Authors:  Yipeng Yang; Yu Wang; Junming Cao; Tao Lei; Zongyou Yang; Hehuan Xia
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 6.  [Research progress of etiologies for C 5 palsy after cervical decompression].

Authors:  Chuan Guo; Xinyue Song; Qingquan Kong; Yu Wang; Ye Wu; Weilong Li
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2022-03-15

7.  Association between pre-operative sagittal alignment and radiographic measures of decompression following cervical laminectomy: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Hamza Asif; Mina Tohidi; Wilma Hopman; David Yen
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-09

8.  Can intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring during cervical spine decompression predict post-operative segmental C5 palsy?

Authors:  Siavash S Haghighi; Donald J Blaskiewicz; Bertha Ramirez; Richard Zhang
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-09

Review 9.  Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: the relevance of the spinal cord back shift after posterior multilevel decompression. A systematic review.

Authors:  Vincenzo Denaro; Umile Giuseppe Longo; Alessandra Berton; Giuseppe Salvatore; Luca Denaro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  The role of iatrogenic foraminal stenosis from lordotic correction in the development of C5 palsy after posterior laminectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Daniel J Blizzard; Michael A Gallizzi; Charles Sheets; Mitchell R Klement; Lindsay T Kleeman; Adam M Caputo; Megan Eure; Christopher R Brown
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.