Literature DB >> 34734142

Association between pre-operative sagittal alignment and radiographic measures of decompression following cervical laminectomy: a retrospective cohort study.

Hamza Asif1,2, Mina Tohidi1,3, Wilma Hopman1,3, David Yen1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The primary purpose of this study was to determine the association between pre-operative cervical sagittal alignment and the extent of cord decompression in the form of increased spinal cord width and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) space in front of and behind the cord in patients undergoing laminectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Secondary objectives included an assessment of the correlation between increasing numbers of levels decompressed and the post-operative cervical spine sagittal alignment, the effect of laminectomy on the change in alignment, as well as effect of laminectomy on pre-existing spinal cord signal abnormality.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent cervical laminectomies, without fusion, between 2015 and 2020. Chart review was used to collect baseline variables. Cervical sagittal alignment, width of the spinal cord, and the CSF space in-front and behind the cord was measured pre-operatively and post-operatively using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans for each patient. The correlation between change in measured parameters and pre-operative cervical sagittal alignment was assessed using Spearman's correlation.
RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were included. Average age was 65.29±10.98 years old. The majority of patients (80%) underwent laminectomies at 3-4 levels. Average pre-operative sagittal alignment determined by the Cobb angle was 6.05°±14.17°, while the average post-operative Cobb angle was 3.15°±16.64°. The change in Cobb angle was not statistically significant (P=0.998). Eleven patients (32%) had pre-operative kyphotic sagittal alignment. The average time from surgery to post-operative MRI scan was 20.44±13.18 months (range, 3-39; median, 18.5; IQR, 23.5). There was no statistically significant association between increasing levels of decompression and change in alignment (P=0.546). Cord signal abnormality persisted after decompression. There was a moderate correlation between lordotic pre-operative cervical sagittal alignment and change in space in-front of the cord (correlation coefficient 0.337, P=0.048) and change in cord width (correlation coefficient 0.388, P=0.021).
CONCLUSIONS: Severity of pre-operative kyphotic sagittal alignment is associated with decreased spinal cord drift and extent of decompression. The pre-operative sagittal alignment is not significantly associated with the change in post-operative alignment. Increasing number of levels decompressed does not worsen a kyphotic cervical spine sagittal alignment. 2021 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM); cervical laminectomy; elective surgical procedures; outcomes; spinal sagittal alignment

Year:  2021        PMID: 34734142      PMCID: PMC8511567          DOI: 10.21037/jss-21-41

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2414-4630


  33 in total

1.  A new concept for making decisions regarding the surgical approach for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: the K-line.

Authors:  Takayuki Fujiyoshi; Masashi Yamazaki; Junko Kawabe; Tomonori Endo; Takeo Furuya; Masao Koda; Akihiko Okawa; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Hiroaki Konishi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Laminectomy with or Without Fusion to Manage Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.

Authors:  Fahad H Abduljabbar; Alisson R Teles; Rakan Bokhari; Michael Weber; Carlo Santaguida
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.509

3.  Cervical Laminectomy With or Without Lateral Mass Instrumentation: A Comparison of Outcomes.

Authors:  Boaz Sungwhan Kim; Rana Singh Dhillon
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.876

Review 4.  Surgical options for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Matthew J Geck; Frank J Eismont
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.472

5.  Laminectomy and fusion versus laminoplasty for the treatment of degenerative cervical myelopathy: results from the AOSpine North America and International prospective multicenter studies.

Authors:  Michael G Fehlings; Carlo Santaguida; Lindsay Tetreault; Paul Arnold; Giuseppe Barbagallo; Helton Defino; Shashank Kale; Qiang Zhou; Tim S Yoon; Branko Kopjar
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2016-09-03       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  Correlation of supine MRI and standing radiographs for cervical sagittal balance in myelopathy patients: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Catherine Boudreau; Sylvine Carrondo Cottin; Jessica Ruel-Laliberté; David Mercier; Nicholas Gélinas-Phaneuf; Jérôme Paquet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  A prospective, randomized trial comparing expansile cervical laminoplasty and cervical laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Glen R Manzano; Gizelda Casella; Michael Y Wang; Steven Vanni; Allan D Levi
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  The relationship between preoperative cervical alignment and postoperative spinal cord drift after decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Vartan S Tashjian; Emil Kohan; David L McArthur; Langston T Holly
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  2009-08

Review 9.  Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: the clinical phenomenon and the current pathobiology of an increasingly prevalent and devastating disorder.

Authors:  Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan; Spyridon K Karadimas; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 7.519

10.  Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: What Really Counts?

Authors:  Oliver Gembruch; Ramazan Jabbarli; Ali Rashidi; Mehdi Chihi; Susann Hetze; Lennart Barthel; Adrian Toplak; Nicolai El Hindy; Ulrich Sure; Philipp Dammann; Neriman Özkan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.