Literature DB >> 22425770

Do patients choose hospitals with high quality ratings? Empirical evidence from the market for angioplasty in the Netherlands.

Marco Varkevisser1, Stéphanie A van der Geest, Frederik T Schut.   

Abstract

A necessary condition for competition to promote quality in hospital markets is that patients are sensitive to differences in hospital quality. In this paper we examine the relationship between hospital quality, as measured by publicly available quality ratings, and patient hospital choice for angioplasty using individual claims data from a large health insurer. We find that Dutch patients have a high propensity to choose hospitals with a good reputation, both overall and for cardiology, and a low readmission rate after treatment for heart failure. Relative to a mean readmission rate of 8.5% we find that a 1%-point lower readmission rate is associated with a 12% increase in hospital demand. Since readmission rates are not adjusted for case-mix they may not provide a correct signal of hospital quality. Insofar patients base their hospital choice on such imperfect quality information, this may result in suboptimal choices and risk selection by hospitals.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22425770     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Econ        ISSN: 0167-6296            Impact factor:   3.883


  24 in total

1.  Patients' Awareness, Usage and Impact of Hospital Report Cards in the US.

Authors:  Martin Emmert; Mark Schlesinger
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Fuzzy bi-objective preventive health care network design.

Authors:  Soheil Davari; Kemal Kilic; Gurdal Ertek
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2014-08-30

3.  Patient hospital choice for hip replacement: empirical evidence from the Netherlands.

Authors:  Puck D C Beukers; Ron G M Kemp; Marco Varkevisser
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2013-10-25

4.  Patients' free choice of physicians is not always good.

Authors:  Xinyu Li; Christian Waibel
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Measurement Error in Discrete Health Facility Choice Models: an Example from Urban Senegal.

Authors:  Christopher J Cronin; David K Guilkey; Ilene S Speizer
Journal:  J Appl Econ (Chichester Engl)       Date:  2019-09-04

6.  Patient satisfaction in cardiology after cardiac catheterization : Effects of treatment outcome, visit characteristics, and perception of received care.

Authors:  R R Weidemann; T Schönfelder; J Klewer; J Kugler
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 1.443

7.  Choice, quality and patients' experience: evidence from a Finnish physiotherapy service.

Authors:  Visa Pitkänen; Ismo Linnosmaa
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2021-01-19

8.  Competition and quality indicators in the health care sector: empirical evidence from the Dutch hospital sector.

Authors:  R R Croes; Y J F M Krabbe-Alkemade; M C Mikkers
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2017-01-03

9.  Choice of hospital: Which type of quality matters?

Authors:  Nils Gutacker; Luigi Siciliani; Giuseppe Moscelli; Hugh Gravelle
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.804

10.  Hospital Quality Factors Influencing the Mobility of Patients for Radical Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy: A National Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Ajay Aggarwal; Daniel Lewis; Arunan Sujenthiran; Susan C Charman; Richard Sullivan; Heather Payne; Malcolm Mason; Jan van der Meulen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.