Literature DB >> 22425572

Effect of specimen gripping device, geometry and fixation method on microtensile bond strength, failure mode and stress distribution: laboratory and finite element analyses.

Luís H A Raposo1, Steven R Armstrong, Rodrigo R Maia, Fang Qian, Saulo Geraldeli, Carlos J Soares.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Innumerous modifications have been proposed for the microtensile test since its introduction; however, testing parameters are not often well described and wide variations in bond strength are commonly reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the test specimen's gripping device, specimen geometry and fixation method on microtensile bond strength, failure mode, and stress distribution when using an etch-and-rinse 2-step adhesive system bonded to human dentin.
METHODS: Resin-based composite bonded to occlusal dentin from 21 human molars was used to fabricate dumbbell- and stick-shaped test specimens which were divided into three groups: Di - dumbbell-specimens placed in a Dircks device; GeS - stick-specimens gripped in a Geraldeli's device with Superglue; GeZ - stick-specimens gripped in a Geraldeli's device with Zapit. Specimens were tested to failure in tensile mode and the failure mode was examined under stereomicroscopy and fracture initiation sites were verified by scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Three-dimensional models of each device/specimen were created and finite element calculations were performed.
RESULTS: The effect of the gripping devices on the bond strength was not significant, unless the bond test areas were normalized. The failure mode was influenced by the type of device. Dircks device was less sensitive to human error than Geraldeli's, and produced a more uniform stress distribution at the dumbbell specimen adhesive layer than did the Geraldeli's device at the stick layer. SIGNIFICANCE: Microtensile testing parameters can directly influence the results and consequently inter-study comparisons.
Copyright © 2012 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22425572     DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  9 in total

1.  Fatigue of the resin-dentin interface: a new approach for evaluating the durability of dentin bonds.

Authors:  Mustafa Murat Mutluay; Mobin Yahyazadehfar; Heonjune Ryou; Hessam Majd; Dominic Do; Dwayne Arola
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 5.304

2.  A new arginine-based dental adhesive system: formulation, mechanical and anti-caries properties.

Authors:  Saulo Geraldeli; Eveline F Soares; Andres J Alvarez; Tanaz Farivar; Robert C Shields; Mario A C Sinhoreti; Marcelle M Nascimento
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2017-06-03       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Fatigue testing of biomaterials and their interfaces.

Authors:  Dwayne Arola
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 5.304

Review 4.  Fatigue bond strength of dental adhesive systems: Historical background of test methodology, clinical considerations and future perspectives.

Authors:  Akimasa Tsujimoto; Wayne W Barkmeier; Erica C Teixeira; Toshiki Takamizawa; Masashi Miyazaki; Mark A Latta
Journal:  Jpn Dent Sci Rev       Date:  2022-06-25

5.  Doxycycline-encapsulated nanotube-modified dentin adhesives.

Authors:  S A Feitosa; J Palasuk; K Kamocki; S Geraldeli; R L Gregory; J A Platt; L J Windsor; M C Bottino
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 6.  Validity of bond strength tests: A critical review-Part II.

Authors:  Kantheti Sirisha; Tankonda Rambabu; Yalavarthi Ravishankar; Pabbati Ravikumar
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2014-09

7.  Dental adhesive microtensile bond strength following a biofilm-based in vitro aging model.

Authors:  Aditi Jain; Steve R Armstrong; Jeffrey A Banas; Fang Qian; Rodrigo R Maia; Erica C Teixeira
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 2.698

Review 8.  Assessment of Bonding Effectiveness of Adhesive Materials to Tooth Structure using Bond Strength Test Methods: A Review of Literature.

Authors:  Aminah M El Mourad
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2018-09-28

Review 9.  The microtensile bond strength test: Its historical background and application to bond testing.

Authors:  Hidehiko Sano; Abu Faem Mohammad Almas Chowdhury; Pipop Saikaew; Mariko Matsumoto; Shuhei Hoshika; Monica Yamauti
Journal:  Jpn Dent Sci Rev       Date:  2019-11-25
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.