Literature DB >> 22425427

Technical refinement and learning curve for attenuating neurapraxia during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy to improve sexual function.

Mehrdad Alemozaffar1, Antoine Duclos, Nathanael D Hevelone, Stuart R Lipsitz, Tudor Borza, Hua-Yin Yu, Keith J Kowalczyk, Jim C Hu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While radical prostatectomy surgeon learning curves have characterized less blood loss, shorter operative times, and fewer positive margins, there is a dearth of studies characterizing learning curves for improving sexual function. Additionally, while learning curve studies often define volume thresholds for improvement, few of these studies demonstrate specific technical modifications that allow reproducibility of improved outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: Demonstrate and quantify the learning curve for improving sexual function outcomes based on technical refinements that reduce neurovascular bundle displacement during nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We performed a retrospective study of 400 consecutive RARPs, categorized into groups of 50, performed after elimination of continuous surgeon/assistant neurovascular bundle countertraction. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: Our approach to RARP has been described previously. A single-console robotic system was used for all cases. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite sexual function was measured within 1 yr of RARP. Linear regression was performed to determine factors influencing the recovery of sexual function. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Greater surgeon experience was associated with better 5-mo sexual function (p = 0.007) and a trend for better 12-mo sexual function (p = 0.061), with improvement plateauing after 250-300 cases. Additionally, younger patient age (both p<0.02) and better preoperative sexual function (<0.001) were associated with better 5- and 12-mo sexual function. Moreover, trainee robotic console time during nerve sparing was associated with worse 12-mo sexual function (p=0.021), while unilateral nerve sparing/non-nerve sparing was associated with worse 5-mo sexual function (p = 0.009). Limitations include the retrospective single-surgeon design.
CONCLUSIONS: With greater surgeon experience, attenuating lateral displacement of the neurovascular bundle and resultant neurapraxia improve postoperative sexual function. However, to maximize outcomes, appropriate patient selection must be exercised when allowing trainee nerve-sparing involvement.
Copyright © 2012 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22425427     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  12 in total

1.  A systematic review of the learning curve in robotic surgery: range and heterogeneity.

Authors:  I Kassite; T Bejan-Angoulvant; H Lardy; A Binet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Current status of various neurovascular bundle-sparing techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Anup Kumar; Sarvesh Tandon; Srinivas Samavedi; Vladimir Mouraviev; Anthony S Bates; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-06-01

3.  Predictive factors for return of erectile function in robotic radical prostatectomy: case series from a single centre.

Authors:  F J Garcia; P D Violette; G B Brock; S E Pautler
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 2.896

4.  Analysis of Accessory Pudendal Artery Transection on Erections During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Stephen B Williams; Blanca E Morales; Linda M Huynh; Kathryn Osann; Douglas W Skarecky; Thomas E Ahlering
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 5.  Robotic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Carrie Y Peterson; Martin R Weiser
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Maneuvers to Attenuate Erectile Dysfunction: Technical Description and Video Compilation.

Authors:  Spyridon P Basourakos; Keith Kowalczyk; Marcio Covas Moschovas; Vanessa Dudley; Andrew J Hung; Jonathan E Shoag; Vipul Patel; Jim C Hu
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 7.  Nerve-sparing techniques and results in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Hasan Hüseyin Tavukçu; Omer Aytac; Fatih Atug
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2016-12-08

8.  Prospective comparison of one year follow-up outcomes for the open complete intrafascial retropubic versus interfascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Wael Y Khoder; Raphaela Waidelich; Alexander Buchner; Armin J Becker; Christian G Stief
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-07-01

Review 9.  Penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy: does it work?

Authors:  Giorgio Gandaglia; Nazareno Suardi; Vito Cucchiara; Marco Bianchi; Shahrokh F Shariat; Morgan Roupret; Andrea Salonia; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2015-04

Review 10.  Surgical management of high-risk, localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Lamont J Wilkins; Jeffrey J Tosoian; Debasish Sundi; Ashley E Ross; Dominic Grimberg; Eric A Klein; Brian F Chapin; Yaw A Nyame
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.