Literature DB >> 22425090

Radical prostatectomy in Austria from 1992 to 2009: an updated nationwide analysis of 33,580 cases.

Clemens Wehrberger1, Ingrid Berger, Manfred Willinger, Stephan Madersbacher.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We analyzed the demographics and outcome of radical prostatectomy in Austria in a nationwide series.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed the records of all 33,580 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy at a public hospital, including 95% of all surgical procedures, in Austria between 1992 and 2009. Patient demographics, perioperative mortality, interventions for anastomotic strictures and urinary incontinence, and overall survival were determined. Data were provided by the Austrian Health Institute.
RESULTS: The annual number of radical prostatectomies increased 688% from 396 in 1992 to 3,123 in 2007 and gradually decreased to 2,612 in 2009. Mean ± SD patient age at surgery decreased slightly from 64.4 ± 6.3 years in 1992 to 62.0 ± 6.7 years in 2003. Age has remained at that level since then. Endourological intervention for anastomotic stricture and urinary incontinence was done in 7.5% and 2.8% of cases, respectively. The risk of each intervention increased with patient age and decreased in patients treated within the last 10 years compared to those treated before 2000. The 30-day mortality rate was 0.1%, which increased threefold from the youngest to the oldest age group. Ten-year overall survival decreased from 93% in patients 45 to 49 years old to 63% in those 70 years old or older at surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide analysis of a country that has had a public, equal access health care system for decades describes some current radical prostatectomy trends. Since 2007, the absolute number of radical prostatectomies has decreased. Data on morbidity, perioperative mortality and overall survival raise caution about performing radical prostatectomy in elderly men, eg those 70 years old or older.
Copyright © 2012 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22425090     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.12.080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  4 in total

Review 1.  [Incontinence after radical prostatectomy : Male Sling or "best option" first?]

Authors:  J F Gerhard; M S Aragona; R Olianas
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Population-based 10-year event-free survival after radical prostatectomy for patients with prostate cancer in British Columbia.

Authors:  Michael Peacock; Jill Quirt; W James Morris; Alan So; Charmaine Kim Sing; Tom Pickles; Scott Tyldesley
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Disease-specific outcomes of radical prostatectomies in Northern Norway; a case for the impact of perineural infiltration and postoperative PSA-doubling time.

Authors:  Sigve Andersen; Elin Richardsen; Yngve Nordby; Nora Ness; Oystein Størkersen; Khalid Al-Shibli; Tom Donnem; Helena Bertilsson; Lill-Tove Busund; Anders Angelsen; Roy M Bremnes
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 2.264

4.  A 5-Year Contemporary Nationwide Evolution of the Radical Prostatectomy Landscape.

Authors:  Guillaume Ploussard; Annabelle Grabia; Jean-Baptiste Beauval; Eric Barret; Laurent Brureau; Charles Dariane; Gaëlle Fiard; Gaëlle Fromont; Mathieu Gauthé; Romain Mathieu; Raphaële Renard-Penna; Guilhem Roubaud; Alain Ruffion; Paul Sargos; François Rozet; Charles-Edouard Lequeu; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2021-10-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.