Literature DB >> 20603431

Hypo-accommodation responses in hypermetropic infants and children.

Anna M Horwood1, Patricia M Riddell.   

Abstract

AIMS: Accommodation to overcome hypermetropia is implicated in emmetropisation. This study recorded accommodation responses in a wide range of emmetropising infants and older children with clinically significant hypermetropia to assess common characteristics and differences.
METHODS: A PlusoptiXSO4 photorefractor in a laboratory setting was used to collect binocular accommodation data from participants viewing a detailed picture target moving between 33 cm and 2 m. 38 typically developing infants were studied between 6 and 26 weeks of age and were compared with cross-sectional data from children 5-9 y of age with clinically significant hypermetropia (n = 15), corrected fully accommodative strabismus (n=14) and 27 age-matched controls.
RESULTS: Hypermetropes of all ages under-accommodated compared to controls at all distances, whether corrected or not (p < 0.00001) and lag related to manifest refraction. Emmetropising infants under-accommodated most in the distance, while the hypermetropic patient groups under-accommodated most for near.
CONCLUSIONS: Better accommodation for near than distance is demonstrated in those hypermetropic children who go on to emmetropise. This supports the approach of avoiding refractive correction in such children. In contrast, hypermetropic children referred for treatment for reduced distance visual acuity are not likely to habitually accommodate to overcome residual hypermetropia left by an under-correction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20603431      PMCID: PMC4533884          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2009.177378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  27 in total

1.  Infant vision screening predicts failures on motor and cognitive tests up to school age.

Authors:  Janette Atkinson; Shirley Anker; Marko Nardini; Oliver Braddick; Claire Hughes; Sarah Rae; John Wattam-Bell; Sue Atkinson
Journal:  Strabismus       Date:  2002-09

Review 2.  To emmetropize or not to emmetropize? The question for hyperopic development.

Authors:  Donald O Mutti
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 3.  A clinical review of hyperopia in young children. The Hyperopic Infants' Study Group, THIS Group.

Authors:  B Moore; S A Lyons; J Walline
Journal:  J Am Optom Assoc       Date:  1999-04

4.  [Can we identify risk groups for the development of amblyopia and strabismus?].

Authors:  J Sjöstrand; M Abrahamsson
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 0.700

5.  Two infant vision screening programmes: prediction and prevention of strabismus and amblyopia from photo- and videorefractive screening.

Authors:  J Atkinson; O Braddick; B Robier; S Anker; D Ehrlich; J King; P Watson; A Moore
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Risk factors for accommodative esotropia among hypermetropic children.

Authors:  Eileen E Birch; Sherry L Fawcett; Sarah E Morale; David R Weakley; Dianna Hughbanks Wheaton
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Association between accommodative accuracy, hypermetropia, and strabismus in children with Down's syndrome.

Authors:  Ruth E Stewart; J Margaret Woodhouse; Mary Cregg; Valerie H Pakeman
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 8.  Management of childhood hyperopia: a pediatric optometrist's perspective.

Authors:  Susan A Cotter
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  A survey of clinical prescribing philosophies for hyperopia.

Authors:  Stacy Ayn Lyons; Lisa A Jones; Jeffrey J Walline; Amelia G Bartolone; Nancy B Carlson; Valerie Kattouf; Monica Harris; Bruce Moore; Donald O Mutti; J Daniel Twelker
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Accommodation, acuity, and their relationship to emmetropization in infants.

Authors:  Donald O Mutti; G Lynn Mitchell; Lisa A Jones; Nina E Friedman; Sara L Frane; Wendy K Lin; Melvin L Moeschberger; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.973

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Why do only some hyperopes become strabismic?

Authors:  Erin Babinsky; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Blur Detection, Depth of Field, and Accommodation in Emmetropic and Hyperopic Children.

Authors:  Tawna L Roberts; Scott B Stevenson; Julia S Benoit; Ruth E Manny; Heather A Anderson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Accommodative lag and refractive error in infants and toddlers.

Authors:  Kristina Tarczy-Hornoch
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 1.220

4.  Visual Function of Moderately Hyperopic 4- and 5-Year-Old Children in the Vision in Preschoolers - Hyperopia in Preschoolers Study.

Authors:  Elise B Ciner; Marjean Taylor Kulp; Maureen G Maguire; Maxwell Pistilli; T Rowan Candy; Bruce Moore; Gui-Shuang Ying; Graham Quinn; Gale Orlansky; Lynn Cyert
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Impact of Cognitive Demand during Sustained Near Tasks in Children and Adults.

Authors:  Tawna L Roberts; Ruth E Manny; Julia S Benoit; Heather A Anderson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  The accommodative lag of the young hyperopic patient.

Authors:  T Rowan Candy; Kathryn H Gray; Christy C Hohenbary; Don W Lyon
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  2016 International Orthoptic Congress Burian Lecture: Folklore or Evidence?

Authors:  Anna M Horwood
Journal:  Strabismus       Date:  2017-04-20

8.  Developmental changes in the balance of disparity, blur, and looming/proximity cues to drive ocular alignment and focus.

Authors:  Anna M Horwood; Patricia M Riddell
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Accommodation and vergence response gains to different near cues characterize specific esotropias.

Authors:  Anna M Horwood; Patricia M Riddell
Journal:  Strabismus       Date:  2013-09

10.  Disparity-driven vs blur-driven models of accommodation and convergence in binocular vision and intermittent strabismus.

Authors:  Anna M Horwood; Patricia M Riddell
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.220

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.