Literature DB >> 22424519

Transcatheter (TAVR) versus surgical (AVR) aortic valve replacement: occurrence, hazard, risk factors, and consequences of neurologic events in the PARTNER trial.

D Craig Miller1, Eugene H Blackstone, Michael J Mack, Lars G Svensson, Susheel K Kodali, Samir Kapadia, Jeevanantham Rajeswaran, William N Anderson, Jeffrey W Moses, E Murat Tuzcu, John G Webb, Martin B Leon, Craig R Smith.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: All neurologic events in the PARTNER randomized trial comparing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) were analyzed.
METHODS: High-risk patients with aortic stenosis were stratified into transfemoral (TF, n = 461) or transapical (TA, n = 196) strata based on their arterial anatomy and randomized: 657 received treatment assigned ("as treated"), 313 underwent AVR, and 344 TAVR. Neurologic events were prospectively adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee. Multivariable, multiphase hazard analysis elucidated factors associated with increased likelihood of neurologic events.
RESULTS: Forty-nine neurologic events (15 transient ischemic attacks, 34 strokes) occurred in 47 patients (TAVR, n = 31; AVR, n = 16). An early peaking high hazard phase occurred within the first week, which declined to a constant late hazard phase out to 2 years. The risk in the early phase was higher after TAVR than AVR, and in the TAVR arm in patients with a smaller aortic valve area index. In the late risk phase, the likelihood of neurologic event was linked to patient-related factors in both arms ("non-TF candidate," history of recent stroke or transient ischemic attack, and advanced functional disability), but not by treatment (TAVR vs AVR) or any intraprocedural variables. The likelihood of sustaining a neurologic event was lowest in the AVR subgroup in the TF stratum during all available follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: After either treatment, there were 2 distinct hazard phases for neurologic events that were driven by different risk factors. Neurologic complications occurred more frequently after TAVR than AVR early, but thereafter the risk was influenced by patient- and disease-related factors. Copyright Â
© 2012 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22424519     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.01.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  52 in total

1.  3D Printed Cardiac Phantom for Procedural Planning of a Transcatheter Native Mitral Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Richard L Izzo; Ryan P O'Hara; Vijay Iyer; Rose Hansen; Karen M Meess; S V Setlur Nagesh; Stephen Rudin; Adnan H Siddiqui; Michael Springer; Ciprian N Ionita
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2016-04-05

Review 2.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: an update.

Authors:  Sharif A Halim; Todd L Kiefer; G Chad Hughes; Lynne M Hurwitz; J Kevin Harrison
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Minimally invasive primary aortic valve surgery: the OLV Aalst experience.

Authors:  Johan van der Merwe; Filip Casselman; Bernard Stockman; Frank Van Praet; Roel Beelen; Lieven Maene; Yvette Vermeulen; Ivan Degrieck
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-03

Review 4.  Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery: state of the art and future directions.

Authors:  Mattia Glauber; Matteo Ferrarini; Antonio Miceli
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-01

Review 5.  Incidence, predictors, origin and prevention of early and late neurological events after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): a comprehensive review of current data.

Authors:  Philipp Kahlert; Fadi Al-Rashid; Björn Plicht; Heike Hildebrandt; Polykarpos Patsalis; Karim El Chilali; Daniel Wendt; Matthias Thielmann; Lars Bergmann; Eva Kottenberg; Marc Schlamann; Holger Eggebrecht; Heinz Jakob; Gerd Heusch; Thomas Konorza; Raimund Erbel
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  Aerosol-generating procedures and risk of transmission of acute respiratory infections: a systematic review.

Authors:  K Tran; K Cimon; M Severn; Cl Pessoa-Silva; J Conly
Journal:  CADTH Technol Overv       Date:  2013-02-01

7.  Aortic stenosis in high-risk patients. Surgical therapy.

Authors:  T Walther; M Arsalan; J Blumenstein; A van Linden; J Kempfert
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 8.  Aortic Valve Surgery: Minimally Invasive Options.

Authors:  Basel Ramlawi; Kareem Bedeir; Joseph Lamelas
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

Review 9.  Pros and cons of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

Authors:  Juan A Terré; Isaac George; Craig R Smith
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-09

Review 10.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: current application and future directions.

Authors:  Amir-Ali Fassa; Dominique Himbert; Alec Vahanian
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.