Literature DB >> 22424160

The Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT): a new tool for the psychosocial evaluation of pre-transplant candidates.

José R Maldonado1, Holly C Dubois, Evonne E David, Yelizaveta Sher, Sermsak Lolak, Jameson Dyal, Daniela Witten.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While medical criteria have been well established for each end-organ system, psychosocial listing criteria are less standardized. To address this limitation, we developed and tested a new assessment tool: the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT).
METHODS: The SIPAT was developed from a comprehensive review of the literature on the psychosocial factors that impact transplant outcomes. Five examiners blindly applied the SIPAT to 102 randomly selected transplant cases, including liver, heart, and lung patients. After all subject's files had been rated by the examiners, the respective transplant teams provided the research team with the patient's outcome data.
RESULTS: Univariate logistic regression models were fit in order to predict the transplant psychosocial outcome (positive or negative) using each rater's SIPAT scores. These results show that SIPAT scores are highly predictive of the transplant psychosocial outcome (P < 0.0001). The instrument has excellent inter-rater reliability (Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.853), even among novice raters.
CONCLUSIONS: The SIPAT is a comprehensive screening tool to assist in the psychosocial assessment of organ transplant candidates. Its strengths includes the standardization of the evaluation process and its ability to identify subjects who are at risk for negative outcomes after the transplant, in order to allow for the development of interventions directed at improving the patient's candidacy. Our goal is that the SIPAT, in addition to a set of agreed upon minimal psychosocial listing criteria, would be used in combination with organ-specific medical listing criteria in order to establish standardized criteria for the selection of transplant recipients. Copyright Â
© 2012 The Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22424160     DOI: 10.1016/j.psym.2011.12.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychosomatics        ISSN: 0033-3182            Impact factor:   2.386


  50 in total

Review 1.  Psychosocial Challenges in Solid Organ Transplantation.

Authors:  Kristin Kuntz; Stephan R Weinland; Zeeshan Butt
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2015-09

2.  Team-Based Biopsychosocial Care in Solid Organ Transplantation.

Authors:  Jared Lyon Skillings; Amber N Lewandowski
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2015-09

3.  HOUSES Index as an Innovative Socioeconomic Measure Predicts Graft Failure Among Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Maria A Stevens; Timothy J Beebe; Chung-Ii Wi; Sandra J Taler; Jennifer L St Sauver; Young J Juhn
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Sex differences in eligibility for advanced heart failure therapies.

Authors:  Rebecca S Steinberg; Aditi Nayak; Celena O'Connell; Sharon Burford; Ann Pekarek; Neile Chesnut; Robert T Cole; Divya Gupta; S Raja Laskar; Kunal Bhatt; Michael Burke; Tamer Attia; Andrew Smith; J David Vega; Alanna A Morris
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 2.863

Review 5.  Ventricular assist devices as destination therapy: psychosocial and ethical implications.

Authors:  Sherry Grogan; Kristin Kostick; Estevan Delgado; Courtenay R Bruce
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

6.  Current Management and Future Treatment of Alcoholic Hepatitis.

Authors:  Mack C Mitchell; Thomas Kerr; H Franklin Herlong
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2020-04

7.  Psychosocial Assessment in Renal Failure and Transplantation.

Authors:  Inna D'Empaire
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

Review 8.  Depression and Anxiety as Risk Factors for Morbidity and Mortality After Organ Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mary Amanda Dew; Emily M Rosenberger; Larissa Myaskovsky; Andrea F DiMartini; Annette J DeVito Dabbs; Donna M Posluszny; Jennifer Steel; Galen E Switzer; Diana A Shellmer; Joel B Greenhouse
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Evaluating resilience as a predictor of outcomes in lung transplant candidates.

Authors:  Yvonne Tran Bui; Matthew A Hathcock; Roberto P Benzo; Marie M Budev; Satish Chandrashekaran; David B Erasmus; Erika D Lease; Deborah J Levine; Karin L Thompson; Bradley K Johnson; Sheila G Jowsey-Gregoire; Cassie C Kennedy
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 2.863

Review 10.  Liver transplant-psychiatric and psychosocial aspects.

Authors:  Sandeep Grover; Siddharth Sarkar
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2012-12-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.