OBJECTIVE: Behavioral inhibition is an early childhood temperament recently associated with altered striatal response in adolescence to incentives of increasing magnitudes. Since early childhood behavioral inhibition is also associated with risk for adolescent social phobia, a similar pattern of striatal activation may manifest in social phobia. The present study compares striatal function in healthy adolescents, adolescents with social phobia, and adolescents with generalized anxiety disorder. METHOD: Blood-oxygen-level-dependent signal in striatal regions was examined in 58 medication-free adolescents—14 with social phobia, 18 with generalized anxiety disorder but not social phobia, and 26 with no psychiatric disorder—matched on sex, age, puberty, IQ, and socioeconomic status. During functional magnetic resonance imaging, participants responded to incentive cues depicting potential monetary gains or losses of varying magnitudes. RESULTS: While anticipating incentives of increasing magnitude, adolescents with social phobia showed increasingly heightened caudate and putamen activation at a level greater than that seen in the healthy comparison and generalized anxiety disorder groups. The generalized anxiety disorder group showed a unique valence-specific putamen response relative to the healthy comparison or social phobia group. Both patient groups displayed more complex patterns in the nucleus accumbens than in the caudate or putamen. CONCLUSIONS: Caudate and putamen hypersensitivity to incentives of increasing magnitudes characterizes adolescent social phobia, relative to activation in this region in adolescents with generalized anxiety disorder as well as healthy adolescents. Thus, these findings resemble the pattern previously found in adolescents with early childhood behavioral inhibition, thereby implicating similar neural responses to anticipation of incentives in both early childhood behavioral inhibition and adolescent social phobia.
OBJECTIVE: Behavioral inhibition is an early childhood temperament recently associated with altered striatal response in adolescence to incentives of increasing magnitudes. Since early childhood behavioral inhibition is also associated with risk for adolescent social phobia, a similar pattern of striatal activation may manifest in social phobia. The present study compares striatal function in healthy adolescents, adolescents with social phobia, and adolescents with generalized anxiety disorder. METHOD: Blood-oxygen-level-dependent signal in striatal regions was examined in 58 medication-free adolescents—14 with social phobia, 18 with generalized anxiety disorder but not social phobia, and 26 with no psychiatric disorder—matched on sex, age, puberty, IQ, and socioeconomic status. During functional magnetic resonance imaging, participants responded to incentive cues depicting potential monetary gains or losses of varying magnitudes. RESULTS: While anticipating incentives of increasing magnitude, adolescents with social phobia showed increasingly heightened caudate and putamen activation at a level greater than that seen in the healthy comparison and generalized anxiety disorder groups. The generalized anxiety disorder group showed a unique valence-specific putamen response relative to the healthy comparison or social phobia group. Both patient groups displayed more complex patterns in the nucleus accumbens than in the caudate or putamen. CONCLUSIONS: Caudate and putamen hypersensitivity to incentives of increasing magnitudes characterizes adolescent social phobia, relative to activation in this region in adolescents with generalized anxiety disorder as well as healthy adolescents. Thus, these findings resemble the pattern previously found in adolescents with early childhood behavioral inhibition, thereby implicating similar neural responses to anticipation of incentives in both early childhood behavioral inhibition and adolescent social phobia.
Authors: K M Thomas; W C Drevets; R E Dahl; N D Ryan; B Birmaher; C H Eccard; D Axelson; P J Whalen; B J Casey Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2001-11
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Patricia Berglund; Olga Demler; Robert Jin; Kathleen R Merikangas; Ellen E Walters Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2005-06
Authors: Philip C Kendall; Scott N Compton; John T Walkup; Boris Birmaher; Anne Marie Albano; Joel Sherrill; Golda Ginsburg; Moira Rynn; James McCracken; Elizabeth Gosch; Courtney Keeton; Lindsey Bergman; Dara Sakolsky; Cindy Suveg; Satish Iyengar; John March; John Piacentini Journal: J Anxiety Disord Date: 2010-02-06
Authors: Sarah M Helfinstein; Brenda Benson; Koraly Perez-Edgar; Yair Bar-Haim; Allison Detloff; Daniel S Pine; Nathan A Fox; Monique Ernst Journal: Neuropsychologia Date: 2010-12-15 Impact factor: 3.139
Authors: Marilyn J Essex; Marjorie H Klein; Marcia J Slattery; H Hill Goldsmith; Ned H Kalin Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2009-11-16 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: A Manelis; C D Ladouceur; S Graur; K Monk; L K Bonar; M B Hickey; A C Dwojak; D Axelson; B I Goldstein; T R Goldstein; G Bebko; M A Bertocci; M K Gill; B Birmaher; M L Phillips Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2015-09-16 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Peter Manza; Sien Hu; Jaime S Ide; Olivia M Farr; Sheng Zhang; Hoi-Chung Leung; Chiang-shan R Li Journal: J Psychopharmacol Date: 2016-01-11 Impact factor: 4.153
Authors: Julie Frost Bellgowan; Peter Molfese; Michael Marx; Moriah Thomason; Daniel Glen; Jessica Santiago; Ian H Gotlib; Wayne C Drevets; J Paul Hamilton Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2015-08-20 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Genna Bebko; Michele A Bertocci; Jay C Fournier; Amanda K Hinze; Lisa Bonar; Jorge R C Almeida; Susan B Perlman; Amelia Versace; Claudiu Schirda; Michael Travis; Mary Kay Gill; Christine Demeter; Vaibhav A Diwadkar; Gary Ciuffetelli; Eric Rodriguez; Thomas Olino; Erika Forbes; Jeffrey L Sunshine; Scott K Holland; Robert A Kowatch; Boris Birmaher; David Axelson; Sarah M Horwitz; L Eugene Arnold; Mary A Fristad; Eric A Youngstrom; Robert L Findling; Mary L Phillips Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Kevin Hilbert; Daniel S Pine; Markus Muehlhan; Ulrike Lueken; Susann Steudte-Schmiedgen; Katja Beesdo-Baum Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2015-10-13 Impact factor: 3.222