| Literature DB >> 22423335 |
Michael L Berumen, Glenn R Almany, Serge Planes, Geoffrey P Jones, Pablo Saenz-Agudelo, Simon R Thorrold.
Abstract
The use of marine protected area (MPA) networks to sustain fisheries and conserve biodiversity is predicated on two critical yet rarely tested assumptions. Individual MPAs must produce sufficient larvae that settle within that reserve's boundaries to maintain local populations while simultaneously supplying larvae to other MPA nodes in the network that might otherwise suffer local extinction. Here, we use genetic parentage analysis to demonstrate that patterns of self-recruitment of two reef fishes (Amphiprion percula and Chaetodon vagabundus) in an MPA in Kimbe Bay, Papua New Guinea, were remarkably consistent over several years. However, dispersal from this reserve to two other nodes in an MPA network varied between species and through time. The stability of our estimates of self-recruitment suggests that even small MPAs may be self-sustaining. However, our results caution against applying optimization strategies to MPA network design without accounting for variable connectivity among species and over time.Entities:
Keywords: Amphiprion percula; Chaetodon vagabundus; connectivity; larval dispersal; marine protected areas; microsatellite parentage analysis; self-recruitment
Year: 2012 PMID: 22423335 PMCID: PMC3298954 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.208
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1LANDSAT image of study locations in Kimbe Bay, Papua New Guinea.
Calculations used to obtain population and variance estimates (following McCormick and Choat 1987) for Chaetodon vagabundus based on 50 × 10 m visual transects stratified in several habitat types on Kimbe Island. N is the number of possible transects that could be fit into each stratum. W is the proportion that each strata makes up of the total area. n is the number of transects in each stratum. is the mean density of C. vagabundus in each stratum. s2 is the variance around the mean density within each stratum
| Strata | Area (m2) | Percent area | Percent fish | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Back lagoon | 30,341 | 6.5 | 60.7 | 0.06471 | 10 | 0.4000 | 0.489 | 2.05 × 10−4 | 24.27 | 1 |
| Crest | 111,744 | 23.8 | 223.5 | 0.23831 | 54 | 1.8519 | 3.600 | 3.79 × 10−3 | 413.87 | 25 |
| Flat | 235,448 | 50.2 | 470.9 | 0.50212 | 13 | 2.0769 | 4.744 | 9.20 × 10−2 | 978.01 | 58 |
| Inshore | 11,290 | 2.4 | 22.6 | 0.02408 | 27 | 1.4074 | 1.405 | 3.02 × 10−5 | 31.78 | 2 |
| Lagoon slope | 80,082 | 17.1 | 160.2 | 0.17079 | 4 | 1.5000 | 3.667 | 2.67 × 10−2 | 240.25 | 14 |
| Totals | 468,905 | 937.8 | 1.00000 | 108 | 0.122757 | 1688 |
Summary of population and variance estimates for Chaetodon vagabundus on Kimbe Island, calculated following McCormick and Choat (1987). s2() represents the variance of overall stratified mean density. t is Student's t for P = 0.05 and n– 1 degrees of freedom. N is the total number of transects that could fit into the whole reef area of Kimbe Island. s () represents the standard deviation of overall stratified mean density (i.e., standard error). Other terms are defined in Table 1
| Population estimate | |
| 1688 | |
| Variance of stratified mean | |
| 0.123 | |
| 95% confidence limits | |
| 310 | |
Figure 2Natal origin and settlement patterns of recruits of (A) Amphiprion percula and (B) Chaetodon vagabundus among three reef groups in Kimbe Bay, Papua New Guinea in 2007. White numbers in parentheses indicate the total number of recruits screened for parentage using microsatellite markers against a pool of potential parents from Kimbe Island. Purple arrows indicate recruits that settled on the same reef as their parents at Kimbe Island (i.e., self-recruitment). Yellow arrows indicate recruits that were born at Kimbe Island that dispersed as pelagic larvae to Garua or Cape Heusner. The adjacent number in the corresponding color of an arrow indicates the number of recruits with that origin and settlement pattern, as determined by parentage analysis.
Figure 3Comparison of self-recruitment and dispersal patterns for two species over time in Kimbe Bay, Papua New Guinea. Purple text indicates the percentage of recruits at Kimbe Island that originated from parents at Kimbe Island (i.e., self-recruitment). Yellow text and arrows indicate the percentage of recruits at Garua and Cape Heusner that were born at Kimbe Island and dispersed as pelagic larvae to these areas. (A) Self-recruitment measured for Chaetodon vagabundus at Kimbe Island in 2005 (Almany et al. 2007). (B) Self-recruitment and dispersal for Amphiprion percula in 2005 (Planes et al. 2009). (C) Self-recruitment and dispersal for C. vagabundus in 2007. Note that percentages are scaled to account for the fact that an estimated 22% of all adults at Kimbe Island were sampled. (D) Self-recruitment and dispersal for A. percula in 2007.