A concise synthesis of 3-(1-alkenyl)isoindolin-1-ones and 5-(1-alkenyl)pyrrol-2-ones by the intermolecular coupling reactions of N-acyliminium ions with unactivated olefins.

A concise synthesis of 3-(1-alkenyl)isoindolin-1-ones and 5-(1-alkenyl)pyrrol-2-ones has been achieved by the coupling reactions of N-acyliminium ions produced from 3-hydroxyisoindol-1-ones or 5-hydroxy-1-pyrrol-2-ones with unactivated olefins in the presence of BF(3)·OEt(2) at room temperature. For most of the olefins, the reactions afforded the C(sp3)-C(sp2) cross-coupling products, but for the α-methylstyrene and 1-hexene, the C(sp3)-C(sp3) cross-coupling products were obtained.

Introduction

The coupling of alcohols with alkynes, aromatics and active methylene compounds has attracted great attention in recent years as an effective and environmentally benign strategy for the construction of carbon–carbon bonds with the concomitant loss of water. For example, the metal-catalyzed coupling of allyl, benzyl, and propargyl alcohols with terminal alkynes to give the doubly alkyl-substituted acetylenes [1-3]; the Brønsted acid and Lewis acid catalyzed coupling of alcohols with indoles to give the 3-alkyl-substituted indoles [4-6]; and the Brønsted acid and Lewis acid-catalyzed coupling of alcohols with 1,3-dicarbonyls to give the 2-alkyl-substituted 1,3-dicarbonyls [7-9]. All these reactions generally proceed by the addition of carbon cations to multiple bonds and subsequent deprotonation. In comparison, the reports for the coupling of alcohols with unactivated olefins to give the corresponding alkyl-substituted alkenes are rare. Lee recently reported a coupling of alcohols with olefins catalyzed by a ruthenium complex to give alkyl-substituted alkenes through the formation of Csp3–Csp2 bonds [10]; Liu reported the FeCl3/TsOH catalyzed coupling of diarylmethanol with styrenes to afford the alkyl-substituted styrenes [11]. We have long been interested in the reactions of N-acyliminium ions produced easily by the Brønsted acid and Lewis acid catalyzed dehydroxylation of α-hydroxyamides [12-14]. The high electrophilicity of these species is very suitable for electrophilic addition to carbon–carbon multiple bonds. The coupling reactions of N-acyliminium ions with various carbon nucleophiles, such as allylsilanes, alkylmetals, TMSCN, 1,3-dicarbonyls, isonitriles, enol derivatives and aromatics has been studied extensively [15-17]. Few reports are found to deal with the intermolecular coupling reactions of N-acyliminium ions with unactivated olefins, although the intramolecular addition of acyliminium ions to olefins has been reported [18]. The reported olefins that coupled with N-acyliminium ions were generally activated alkenes, such as 1-alkenylsilanes [19], 1-alkenylcoppers [20-21], 1-alkenylalanes [22] and 1-alkenylboronic acid, or esters [23-24] besides allylsilane. For example, Angst reported the coupling of styrylsilanes with N-acyl-2-chloroglycine esters catalyzed by SnCl4 to give the 3-styryl glycine derivatives in 1987 [19]; Wistrand reported the coupling of methyl 1-acyl-5-methoxy-L-proline with 1-alkenylcoppers catalyzed by BF3·OEt2 to give methyl 1-acyl-5-(1-alkenyl)-L-proline in 1992 [20]; Menicagli reported the coupling of N-acylisoquinolium chloride with di-isobutyl 1-hexenylalanes to give 1,2-dihydro-2-acyl-1-hexenylisoquinolines in 2008 [22]; Schaus reported the coupling of 1-alkenylboronates with 2-ethoxy-N-acylquinolines catalyzed by tartaric acid to produce 2-(1-alkenyl)-N-acylquinolines in 2011 [23]. We report here a concise synthesis of 3-(1-alkenyl)isoindolin-1-ones and 5-(1-alkenyl)pyrrol-2-ones by the cross-coupling reactions of N-acyliminium ions derived from 3-hydroxyisoindol-1-ones or 5-hydroxypyrrol-2-ones with unactivated olefins such as styrene (2a) (Scheme 1 and Scheme 2).

Scheme 1

Reaction of 3-hydroxyisoindol-1-one with styrene.

Scheme 2

Reaction of 5-hydroxypyrrol-1-one with styrene.

Isoindolinones and pyrrolones are the core structures of numerous natural alkaloids [25-27] as well as many drug candidates [28-30]. Isoindolinones demonstrate a remarkably wide range of biological activities, including anti-inflammatory, antihypertensive, antipsychotic and antileukemic and antiviral effects [31-33]. Thus, many methods have been developed to synthesize 2- or 3-functionalized isoindolinones. Among them, only two reports dealt with the synthesis of 3-(1-alkenyl)isoindolin-1-one derivatives. One was, as mentioned above, by the Cp2ZrCl2 catalyzed coupling of N-acyliminium ions with in situ generated dimethyl 1-alkenylalanes [24], another was performed by the palladium-catalyzed coupling of 2-iodobenzoyl chloride with aldimines and subsequent cyclization [34]. The results of our investigation have furnished another route to the synthesis of 3-(1-alkenyl)isoindolin-1-ones and 5-(1-alkenyl)pyrrol-2-ones.

Results and Discussion

Two kinds of N-acyliminium ion precursors, 3-hydroxyisoindol-1-ones (1a–c) and 5-hydroxypyrrol-2-ones (5a,b) were easily prepared by the reduction of the parent phthalimide [35] and maleimide [36] derivatives. In order to explore the effects of the experimental conditions on the coupling reactions, the reaction of 1a with styrene (2a) was selected as a representative and carried out at room temperature under different conditions (Table 1). The use of a larger amount of catalyst led to an increase in the yield of the coupling product 3a (Table 1, entries 1–3). This observation is general for most of the intermolecular coupling reactions of N-acyliminium ions with the weakest nucleophiles [14-16]. Of the catalysts examined, BF3·OEt2 was very efficient for the formation of 3a compared to other catalysts such as CF3SO3H, CH3CO2H, TiCl4, SnCl4 and InCl3. Among various solvents tested, anhydrous dichloromethane (DCM) appeared to be the best choice, providing the desired adduct in the highest yield (>80%). Thus, the reaction employing 2.0 equiv BF3·OEt2 as catalyst and anhydrous DCM as solvent at room temperature was selected as the model for the general conditions for all of the other reactions.

Table 1

Optimization of the intermolecular coupling reaction of 1a with 2a.a

Entry	Solvent	Catalyst	t(h)	T(°C)	Yieldb(%)
1	CH2Cl2	1.0 equiv BF3·OEt2	1.0	25	65
2	CH2Cl2	1.5 equiv BF3·OEt2	1.0	25	80
3	CH2Cl2	2.0 equiv BF3·OEt2	1.0	25	83
4	CH2Cl2	2.0 equiv CF3SO3H	1.0	25	50
5	CH2Cl2	2.0 equiv CF3CO2H	1.0	25	37
6	CH2Cl2	2.0 equiv TiCl4	1.0	25	30
7	CH2Cl2	2.0 equiv SnCl4	1.0	25	25
8	CH2Cl2	2.0 equiv InCl3	1.0	25	21
9	CH3CN	2.0 equiv BF3·OEt2	1.0	25	66
10	Et2O	2.0 equiv BF3·OEt2	1.0	25	64

aReactions were carried out on 1.0 mmol scale in 15.0 mL of solvent for 1.0 h with 1a (0.1 mmol), 2a (2.0 mmol) and catalyst (2.0 mmol); bisolated yields based on 1a.

Under the selected conditions, the reactions of substrates 1a–c with different olefins, such as styrene (2a), α-methylstyrene (2b), 1,1-diphenylethene (2c), indene (2d), cyclohexene (2e), 3,4-dihydropyran (2f), 2,3-dihydofuran (2g) and 1-hexene (2h), were examined (Scheme 3). All reactions proceeded quickly to afford the corresponding coupling products 3a–o or 4a–d in moderate to high yields (Table 2 and Table 3). The products were fully characterized by 1H, 13C NMR and HRMS, and the structure of 3h was further confirmed by X-ray crystallography (Figure 1).

Scheme 3

Reactions of 5-hydroxyisoindol-1-ones with olefins in the presence of BF3·OEt2.

Table 2

The reactions of 3-hydroxyisoindol-1-one 1a with olefins 2 in the presence of BF3·OEt2.a

Entry	Reactants						t (h)	T (°C)	Product		Yieldb (%)
		R1		R2	R3	R4			R5
1	1a	PhCH2	2a	H	Ph	H	0.5	25	—	3a	83
2	1a	PhCH2	2b	CH3	Ph	H	0.5	25	H	4a	90
3	1a	PhCH2	2c	Ph	Ph	H	0.25	25	—	3b	93
4	1a	PhCH2	2d	H	–CH2C6H4–		1.0	25	—	3c	78
5	1a	PhCH2	2e	H	–(CH2)4–		1.0	25	—	3d	77
6	1a	PhCH2	2f	H	–(CH2)3O–		1.0	25	—	3e	59
7	1a	PhCH2	2g	H	–(CH2)2O–		1.0	25	—	3f	54
8	1a	PhCH2	2h	H	H	n-Bu	2.0	25	n-Pr	4b	47

aAll reactions were performed under the optimal conditions; bisolated yields based on 1a.

Table 3

The reactions of 3-hydroxyisoindol-1-one (1b,c) with olefins 2 in the presence of BF3·OEt2.a

Entry	Reactants						t (h)	T (°C)	Product		Yieldb (%)
		R1		R2	R3	R4			R5
1	1b	CH3	2a	H	Ph	H	0.5	25	—	3g	70
2	1b	CH3	2b	CH3	Ph	H	0.5	25	H	4c	93
3	1b	CH3	2c	Ph	Ph	H	0.25	25	—	3h	94
4	1b	CH3	2d	H	–CH2C6H4–		0.5	25	—	3i	65
5	1b	CH3	2e	H	–(CH2)4–		1.0	25	—	3j	53
6	1b	CH3	2f	H	–(CH2)3O–		1.0	25	—	3k	48
7	1b	CH3	2g	H	–(CH2)2O–		1.0	25	—	3l	45
8	1c	H	2a	H	Ph	H	1.0	25	—	3m	58
9	1c	H	2b	CH3	Ph	H	1.0	25	H	4d	66
10	1c	H	2c	Ph	Ph	H	1.0	25	—	3n	73
11	1c	H	2d	H	–CH2C6H4–		1.0	25	—	3o	50

aAll reactions were performed under the optimal conditions; bisolated yields based on 1b,c.

Figure 1

X-Ray structure (ORTEP drawing) of 3h.

It can be seen from Table 2 and Table 3 that substituents such as the benzyl and methyl group at the N-atom in 1a,b favored the formation of the coupling products and, thus, higher yields of product were produced from 1a,b. Moreover, both the reaction efficiency and selectivity appeared to be strongly dependent upon variation of the structure of the alkene component. The yields of the coupling adducts are seen to gradually decrease as the nucleophilicity of the alkene diminishes, as is exemplified by the yields recorded for the reactions between 1a and 1b and diphenyl ethylene, α-methylstyrene and styrene (case of 1a: Table 2, entries 1–3 and case of 1b: Table 3, entries 1–3). The same trend is also observed in the less favorable case of 1c (Table 3, entries 8–10). Consistent with this reactivity profile, hexene gave only a moderate yield of adduct 4b when reacted with 1a (Table 2, entry 8). Likewise, alkenes bearing allylic protons prone to β-elimination, such as α-methylstyrene and hexane, did not afford the “normal” Csp3–Csp2 vinylic adducts of type 3, but instead the Csp3–Csp3 coupling products 4 were isolated (Table 2, entries 2 and 8 and Table 3, entries 2 and 9) much like the ene-type adducts of oxonium ion with olefins [37-38]. This means that these alkenes may be envisioned as surrogates of their corresponding, more expensive and less atom-economical, allylsilane derivatives, which are typically used in N-acyliminium ion chemistry to produce amide compounds substituted with an α-allyl group. The reactions of cyclic alkenes (2d–g) with 1a,b all gave the normal Csp3–Csp2 coupling products in moderate yields.

The coupling reactions were examined under the same conditions with alternate substrates (5a,b), and olefins (2a–c) (Scheme 4). All these reactions gave the cross-coupling products (Table 4). As compared with 1a–c, the rates of the coupling reactions of 5a,b with 2a–c were somewhat slower and the yields of the corresponding products were also decreased, probably as a result of both the limited nucleophilicity parameter of the alkenes [39] and the lower stability of the transient N-acyliminium intermediate derived from 5a,b. Similarly to the reactions of 1a–c with α-methylstyrene (2b), the reactions of 5a,b with 2b also gave the Csp3–Csp3 coupling products 7a,b instead of the Csp3–Csp2 coupling products.

Scheme 4

Reactions of 5-hydroxypyrrol-1-ones with olefins in the presence of BF3·OEt2.

Table 4

The reactions of 5-hydroxypyrrol-2-ones 5 with olefins 2 in the presence of BF3·OEt2.a

Entry	Reactants					t (h)	T (°C)	Product	Yieldb (%)
		R1		R2	R3
1	5a	PhCH2	2a	H	Ph	2.0	25	6a	55
2	5a	PhCH2	2b	CH3	Ph	2.0	25	7a	82
3	5a	PhCH2	2c	Ph	Ph	2.0	25	6b	72
4	5b	CH3	2a	CH3	Ph	2.0	25	7b	72
5	5b	CH3	2b	Ph	Ph	2.0	25	6c	65

aAll reactions were performed under the optimal conditions; bisolated yields based on 5a,b.

Conclusion

In summary, we have developed a concise route for the synthesis of 3-(1-alkenyl)isoindolin-1-ones and 5-(1-alkenyl)pyrrol-2-ones by the coupling reactions of N-acyliminium ions derived from 3-hydroxyisoindol-1-ones or 5-hydroxypyrrol-2-ones with unactivated olefins in the presence of BF3·OEt2 at room temperature. For most of the olefins, the reactions afforded the Csp3–Csp2 cross-coupling products, but for α-methylstyrene and 1-hexene, the Csp3–Csp3 cross-coupling products were produced.

Experimental

General information

All reagents were purchased from commercial suppliers and used without further purification. All solvents were dried and redistilled before use. Flash chromatography was carried out with silica gel (200–300 mesh). Analytical TLC was performed with silica gel GF254 plates, and the products were visualized by UV detection. Melting points were determined on a Yanagimoto melting point apparatus and are uncorrected. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AM-400 NMR or a Bruker DRX-300 NMR spectrometer in CDCl3 with TMS as an internal standard. EIMS were recorded with a HP 5988 A mass spectrometer. HRMS (ESI) were measured on a Bruker Dattonics APEX 47e mass spectrometer.

General procedure for the coupling reactions

To a solution of 1a (1.0 mmol) and olefin 2a (2.0 mmol) in 15 mL of anhydrous methylene dichloride, BF3·OEt2 (2.0 mmol) was added at 25 °C in one portion under stirring. After continued stirring at 25 °C until 1a disappeared (monitored by TLC), the reaction was quenched with water. The mixture was separated and the aqueous phase was extracted with methylene dichloride (10 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with water (20 mL), dried with anhydrous Na2SO4 and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was separated by silica-gel column chromatography, eluted by hexane/acetone (10:1 v/v), to give the corresponding product 3a.

()-2-Benzyl-3-(2-phenylethenyl)isoindolin-1-one (3a): Colorless syrup; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.22 (d, J = 14.8 Hz, 1H), 4.90 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 5.33 (d, J = 14.8 Hz, 1H), 5.82 (dd, J = 9.2 Hz, 15.6 Hz, 1H), 6.77 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 7.28–7.37 (m, 11H), 7.50–7.55 (m, 2H), 7.92 (dd, J = 1.6 Hz, 6.4 Hz, 1H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 44.1, 62.7, 123.2, 123.8, 125.6, 126.7 (2C), 127.5, 128.4 (2C), 128.5 (2C), 128.6 (2C), 128.7, 128.7, 131.7, 131.8, 135.7, 135.9, 137.4, 144.5, 168.0 (CO) ppm; EIMS m/z (% relative intensity): 325 (56), 310 (29), 234 (89), 220 (31), 149 (46), 91 (45), 57 (53), 44 (100); HRMS–ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calculated for C23H20NO, 326.1540; found, 326.1536.

2-Benzyl-3-(2-phenyl-2-propenyl)isoindolin-1-one (4a): Colorless solid, mp 69–72 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.54 (dd, J = 9.2 Hz, 14.0 Hz, 1H), 3.40 (dd, J = 4.0 Hz, 14.0 Hz, 1H), 4.24 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 4.39 (dd, J = 4.0 Hz, 9.2 Hz, 1H), 5.00 (s, 1H), 5.38 (s, 1H), 5.40 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 7.20–7.31 (m, 11H), 7.41 (t, J = 4.0 Hz, 2H), 7.86 (t, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 38.1, 44.1, 56.9, 116.9, 123.2, 123.7, 126.1 (2C), 127.6, 127.8, 128.1, 128.1 (2C), 128.5 (2C), 128.8 (2C), 130.9, 131.8, 137.0, 139.8, 143.6, 145.2, 168.4 (CO) ppm; MS m/z (% relative intensity): 339 (1), 253 (4), 237 (6), 222 (100), 197 (5), 149 (13), 91 (71); HRMS–ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C24H22NO, 340.1696; found, 340.1699.

2-Benzyl-3-cyclohexenylisoindolin-1-one (3d): Colorless solid, mp 109–112 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.15–1.19 (m, 1H), 1.38–1.43 (m, 3H), 1.50–1.59 (m, 2H), 2.13 (t, J = 2.4 Hz, 2H), 4.06 (d, J = 14.8 Hz, 1H), 4.71 (s, 1H), 5.19 (d, J = 14.8 Hz, 1H), 5.93 (s, 1H), 7.26–7.30 (m, 5H), 7.41–7.50 (m, 3H), 7.87 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 21.8, 22.0, 22.2, 25.4, 43.9, 66.7, 122.4, 123.4, 127.3, 128.1, 128.4 (4C), 130.2, 131.4, 132.3, 133.4, 137.4, 144.4, 168.3 (CO) ppm; MS m/z (% relative intensity): 303 (64), 222 (27), 199 (70), 183 (6), 170 (12), 157 (15), 129 (27), 91 (100), 40 (37); HRMS–ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C21H22NO, 304.1696; found, 304.1691.

()-2-Benzyl-3-(hex-2-enyl)isoindolin-1-one (4b): Colorless syrup; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 0.74 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H), 1.25–1.87 (m, 2H), 1.79–1.86 (m, 2H), 2.55–2.70 (m, 2H), 4.17 (d, J = 15.2 Hz, 1H), 4.39 (dd, J = 4.0 Hz, 5.6 Hz, 1H), 4.91–4.98 (m, 1H), 5.36–5.42 (m, 1H), 5.42 (d, J = 15.2 Hz, 1H), 7.28–7.32 (m, 5H), 7.37 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.43–7.53 (m, 2H), 7.88 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 13.4, 22.3, 34.1, 34.5, 43.9, 58.4, 122.4 (2C), 123.7, 127.5, 128.0, 128.1 (2C), 128.7 (2C), 131.2, 132.4, 135.4, 137.2, 145.1, 168.5 (CO) ppm; MS m/z (% relative intensity): 305 (4), 223 (18), 222 (100), 186 (6), 172 (6), 132 (8), 104 (5), 91 (89); HRMS–ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C21H24NO, 306.1853; found, 306.1851.

3-(2,2-Diphenylethenyl)-2-methylisoindolin-1-one (3h): Colorless solid, mp 146–148 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.08 (s, 3H), 5.01 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 5.71 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 7.25–7.27 (m, 5H), 7.38–7.46 (m, 5H), 7.47–7.52 (m, 3H), 7.83 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 27.5, 61.3, 122.8, 123.4, 124.3, 127.2 (2C), 127.9, 128.1, 128.3 (3C), 128.8 (2C), 129.5 (2C), 131.3, 132.3, 138.5, 140.4, 144.5, 148.1, 168.0 (CO) ppm; MS m/z (% relative intensity): 325 (28), 310 (15), 294 (9), 265 (5), 248 (11), 220 (18), 188 (10), 178 (11), 165 (13), 149 (37), 91 (30), 57 (63), 43 (100); HRMS–ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C23H20NO, 326.1540; found, 326.1545.

Crystal data for 3h (recrystallized from ethanol): C23H19NO, Mr = 325.39. Monoclinic, a = 17.373(11) Å, b = 17.241(11) Å, c = 24.421(16) Å, β = 91.219(9), V = 7313(8) Å3, colorless plates, ρ = 1.182 g cm−3, T = 296(2) K, space group P2(1)/c, Z = 4, μ (Mo Kα) = 0.084 mm−1, 2θmax = 51°, 9126 reflections measured, 3995 unique (Rint = 0.0696), which were used in all calculations. The final wR(F) was 0.1427 (for all data), R1 = 0.0764. CCDC file No. 835330.

3-(3,4-Dihydro-2-pyran-5-yl)-2-methylisoindolin-1-one (3k): Colorless solid, mp 94–97 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.20–1.27 (m, 1H), 1.40–1.47 (m, 1H), 1.71–1.79 (m, 2H), 3.00 (s, 3H), 3.92–4.04 (m, 2H), 4.65 (s, 1H), 6.79 (s, 1H), 7.36 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.44 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.53 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.81 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 17.0, 21.5, 26.6, 65.2, 66.0, 108.2, 122.2, 123.0, 128.1, 131.3, 132.7, 144.2, 144.6, 168.2 (CO) ppm; MS m/z (% relative intensity): 229 (100), 200 (47), 186 (35), 172 (54), 146 (51), 128 (20), 115 (17), 91 (24); HRMS–ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C14H16NO2, 230.1176; found, 230.1175.

()-1-Benzyl-5-(2-phenylethenyl)-1-pyrrol-2(5)-one (6a): Colorless syrup; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.08 (d, J = 14.8 Hz, 1H), 4.54 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 5.12 (d, J = 14.8 Hz, 1H), 5.69 (dd, J = 9.2 Hz, 15.6 Hz, 1H), 6.26 (dd, J = 1.6 Hz, 5.6 Hz, 1H), 6.59 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 6.96 (dd, J = 1.6 Hz, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 7.23–7.35 (m, 8H), 7.40 (dd, J = 1.6 Hz, 8.0 Hz, 2H) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 42.4, 64.8, 126.1, 126.6, 127.4, 128.0, 128.2, 128.6 (2C), 128.7 (2C), 128.7 (2C), 128.9 (2C), 135.7, 137.6, 146.6, 170.9 (CO) ppm; MS m/z (% relative intensity): 275 (22), 190 (11), 189 (100), 184 (30), 161 (29), 160 (39), 132 (37), 119 (22), 104 (48), 91 (21); HRMS–ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C19H18NO, 276.1383; found, 276.1385.

Characterization data of the title compounds, 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra.

X-ray data for compound 3h.