BACKGROUND: Disadvantaged socio-economic position (SEP) in childhood is associated with increased adult mortality and morbidity. We aimed to establish whether childhood SEP was associated with differential methylation of adult DNA. METHODS: Forty adult males from the 1958 British Birth Cohort Study were selected from SEP extremes in both early childhood and mid-adulthood. We performed genome-wide methylation analysis on blood DNA taken at 45 years using MeDIP (methylated DNA immunoprecipitation). We mapped in triplicate the methylation state of promoters of approximately 20,000 genes and 400 microRNAs. Probe methylation scores were averaged across triplicates and differential methylation between groups of individuals was determined. Differentially methylated promoter sites of selected genes were validated using pyrosequencing of bisulfite-converted DNA. RESULTS: Variably methylated probes (9112 from n = 223,359 on the microarray) corresponded to 6176 gene promoters with at least one variable probe. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of probes obtained from the 500 most variable promoters revealed a cluster enriched with high SEP individuals confirming that SEP differences contribute to overall epigenetic variation. Methylation levels for 1252 gene promoters were associated with childhood SEP vs 545 promoters for adulthood SEP. Functionally, associations with childhood SEP appear in promoters of genes enriched in key cell signalling pathways. The differentially methylated promoters associated with SEP cluster in megabase-sized regions of the genome. CONCLUSIONS: Adult blood DNA methylation profiles show more associations with childhood SEP than adult SEP. Organization of these associations across the genome suggests a well-defined epigenetic pattern linked to early socio-economic environment.
BACKGROUND: Disadvantaged socio-economic position (SEP) in childhood is associated with increased adult mortality and morbidity. We aimed to establish whether childhood SEP was associated with differential methylation of adult DNA. METHODS: Forty adult males from the 1958 British Birth Cohort Study were selected from SEP extremes in both early childhood and mid-adulthood. We performed genome-wide methylation analysis on blood DNA taken at 45 years using MeDIP (methylated DNA immunoprecipitation). We mapped in triplicate the methylation state of promoters of approximately 20,000 genes and 400 microRNAs. Probe methylation scores were averaged across triplicates and differential methylation between groups of individuals was determined. Differentially methylated promoter sites of selected genes were validated using pyrosequencing of bisulfite-converted DNA. RESULTS: Variably methylated probes (9112 from n = 223,359 on the microarray) corresponded to 6176 gene promoters with at least one variable probe. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of probes obtained from the 500 most variable promoters revealed a cluster enriched with high SEP individuals confirming that SEP differences contribute to overall epigenetic variation. Methylation levels for 1252 gene promoters were associated with childhood SEP vs 545 promoters for adulthood SEP. Functionally, associations with childhood SEP appear in promoters of genes enriched in key cell signalling pathways. The differentially methylated promoters associated with SEP cluster in megabase-sized regions of the genome. CONCLUSIONS: Adult blood DNA methylation profiles show more associations with childhood SEP than adult SEP. Organization of these associations across the genome suggests a well-defined epigenetic pattern linked to early socio-economic environment.
Authors: Shalima S Nair; Marcel W Coolen; Clare Stirzaker; Jenny Z Song; Aaron L Statham; Dario Strbenac; Mark D Robinson; Susan J Clark Journal: Epigenetics Date: 2011-01-01 Impact factor: 4.528
Authors: Rafael A Irizarry; Christine Ladd-Acosta; Benilton Carvalho; Hao Wu; Sheri A Brandenburg; Jeffrey A Jeddeloh; Bo Wen; Andrew P Feinberg Journal: Genome Res Date: 2008-03-03 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Aravind Subramanian; Pablo Tamayo; Vamsi K Mootha; Sayan Mukherjee; Benjamin L Ebert; Michael A Gillette; Amanda Paulovich; Scott L Pomeroy; Todd R Golub; Eric S Lander; Jill P Mesirov Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-09-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Nicole K MacLennan; S Jill James; Stephan Melnyk; Ali Piroozi; Stefanie Jernigan; Jennifer L Hsu; Sara M Janke; Tho D Pham; Robert H Lane Journal: Physiol Genomics Date: 2004-06-17 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Mary Beth Terry; Jennifer S Ferris; Richard Pilsner; Julie D Flom; Parisa Tehranifar; Regina M Santella; Mary V Gamble; Ezra Susser Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Bruna Galobardes; Mary Shaw; Debbie A Lawlor; John W Lynch; George Davey Smith Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Hudson P Santos; Arjun Bhattacharya; Elizabeth M Martin; Kezia Addo; Matt Psioda; Lisa Smeester; Robert M Joseph; Stephen R Hooper; Jean A Frazier; Karl C Kuban; T Michael O'Shea; Rebecca C Fry Journal: Epigenetics Date: 2019-05-21 Impact factor: 4.528
Authors: R Karlsson Linnér; R E Marioni; C A Rietveld; A J Simpkin; N M Davies; K Watanabe; N J Armstrong; K Auro; C Baumbach; M J Bonder; J Buchwald; G Fiorito; K Ismail; S Iurato; A Joensuu; P Karell; S Kasela; J Lahti; A F McRae; P R Mandaviya; I Seppälä; Y Wang; L Baglietto; E B Binder; S E Harris; A M Hodge; S Horvath; M Hurme; M Johannesson; A Latvala; K A Mather; S E Medland; A Metspalu; L Milani; R L Milne; A Pattie; N L Pedersen; A Peters; S Polidoro; K Räikkönen; G Severi; J M Starr; L Stolk; M Waldenberger; J G Eriksson; T Esko; L Franke; C Gieger; G G Giles; S Hägg; P Jousilahti; J Kaprio; M Kähönen; T Lehtimäki; N G Martin; J B C van Meurs; M Ollikainen; M Perola; D Posthuma; O T Raitakari; P S Sachdev; E Taskesen; A G Uitterlinden; P Vineis; C Wijmenga; M J Wright; C Relton; G Davey Smith; I J Deary; P D Koellinger; D J Benjamin Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2017-10-31 Impact factor: 15.992