OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine the in vivo efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in porcine liver using Octopus® electrodes for creating a large coagulation compared with RFA using clustered electrodes. METHODS: A total of 39 coagulations were created using a 200-W generator and clustered electrodes or Octopus electrodes during laparotomy in 19 pigs. Radiofrequency was applied to the livers using four protocols: (1) Group A-1, monopolar mode using a clustered electrode (n=11); (2) Group A-2, monopolar mode using an Octopus electrode (n=11); (3) Group B-1, consecutive monopolar mode using three, clustered electrodes (n=8); and (4) Group B-2, switching monopolar mode using two Octopus electrodes (n=9). The energy efficiency, shape, diameters (D) and volume (V) of the coagulation volume were compared in each of the two groups. RESULTS: The mean maximum D and V of the coagulations in Group A-2 (4.7 cm and 33.1 cm(3), respectively) were significantly larger than those in Group A-1 (4.1 cm and 20.3 cm(3), respectively) (p<0.05). Furthermore, the mean minimum D, maximum D and V of the coagulations in Group B-2 were significantly larger than those in Group B-1, i.e. 5.3 vs 4.0 cm, 6.6 vs 4.9 cm and 66.9 vs 30.2 cm(3), respectively (p<0.05). The energy efficiencies were also significantly higher in Groups A-2 and B-2 than in Groups A-1 and B-1 (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The Octopus electrodes were more efficient for creating a large ablation zone than clustered electrodes, and the efficacy of RFA with Octopus electrodes can be amplified in the switching monopolar mode.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine the in vivo efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in porcine liver using Octopus® electrodes for creating a large coagulation compared with RFA using clustered electrodes. METHODS: A total of 39 coagulations were created using a 200-W generator and clustered electrodes or Octopus electrodes during laparotomy in 19 pigs. Radiofrequency was applied to the livers using four protocols: (1) Group A-1, monopolar mode using a clustered electrode (n=11); (2) Group A-2, monopolar mode using an Octopus electrode (n=11); (3) Group B-1, consecutive monopolar mode using three, clustered electrodes (n=8); and (4) Group B-2, switching monopolar mode using two Octopus electrodes (n=9). The energy efficiency, shape, diameters (D) and volume (V) of the coagulation volume were compared in each of the two groups. RESULTS: The mean maximum D and V of the coagulations in Group A-2 (4.7 cm and 33.1 cm(3), respectively) were significantly larger than those in Group A-1 (4.1 cm and 20.3 cm(3), respectively) (p<0.05). Furthermore, the mean minimum D, maximum D and V of the coagulations in Group B-2 were significantly larger than those in Group B-1, i.e. 5.3 vs 4.0 cm, 6.6 vs 4.9 cm and 66.9 vs 30.2 cm(3), respectively (p<0.05). The energy efficiencies were also significantly higher in Groups A-2 and B-2 than in Groups A-1 and B-1 (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The Octopus electrodes were more efficient for creating a large ablation zone than clustered electrodes, and the efficacy of RFA with Octopus electrodes can be amplified in the switching monopolar mode.
Authors: Fred T Lee; Dieter Haemmerich; Andrew S Wright; David M Mahvi; Lisa A Sampson; John G Webster Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: G D Dodd; M C Soulen; R A Kane; T Livraghi; W R Lees; Y Yamashita; A R Gillams; O I Karahan; H Rhim Journal: Radiographics Date: 2000 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Tito Livraghi; Luigi Solbiati; M Franca Meloni; G Scott Gazelle; Elkan F Halpern; S Nahum Goldberg Journal: Radiology Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Jae Won Choi; Jeong Min Lee; Dong Ho Lee; Jung Hwan Yoon; Yoon Jun Kim; Jeong Hoon Lee; Su Jong Yu; Eun Ju Cho Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2020-07-22 Impact factor: 3.500
Authors: Eun Sun Lee; Jeong Min Lee; Kyung Won Kim; In Joon Lee; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2013-02-22 Impact factor: 3.500
Authors: Jin Woo Choi; Jeong Min Lee; Dong Ho Lee; Jeong-Hee Yoon; Kyung-Suk Suh; Jung-Hwan Yoon; Yoon Jun Kim; Jeong-Hoon Lee; Su Jong Yu; Joon Koo Han Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-08-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Tae Won Choi; Jeong Min Lee; Dong Ho Lee; Jeong-Hoon Lee; Su Jong Yu; Yoon Jun Kim; Jung-Hwan Yoon; Joon Koo Han Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2017-07-17 Impact factor: 3.500