Literature DB >> 22422385

Multiple-electrode radiofrequency ablations using Octopus® electrodes in an in vivo porcine liver model.

E S Lee1, J M Lee, W S Kim, S H Choi, I Joo, M Kim, D H Yoo, R-E Yoo, J K Han, B I Choi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine the in vivo efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in porcine liver using Octopus® electrodes for creating a large coagulation compared with RFA using clustered electrodes.
METHODS: A total of 39 coagulations were created using a 200-W generator and clustered electrodes or Octopus electrodes during laparotomy in 19 pigs. Radiofrequency was applied to the livers using four protocols: (1) Group A-1, monopolar mode using a clustered electrode (n=11); (2) Group A-2, monopolar mode using an Octopus electrode (n=11); (3) Group B-1, consecutive monopolar mode using three, clustered electrodes (n=8); and (4) Group B-2, switching monopolar mode using two Octopus electrodes (n=9). The energy efficiency, shape, diameters (D) and volume (V) of the coagulation volume were compared in each of the two groups.
RESULTS: The mean maximum D and V of the coagulations in Group A-2 (4.7 cm and 33.1 cm(3), respectively) were significantly larger than those in Group A-1 (4.1 cm and 20.3 cm(3), respectively) (p<0.05). Furthermore, the mean minimum D, maximum D and V of the coagulations in Group B-2 were significantly larger than those in Group B-1, i.e. 5.3 vs 4.0 cm, 6.6 vs 4.9 cm and 66.9 vs 30.2 cm(3), respectively (p<0.05). The energy efficiencies were also significantly higher in Groups A-2 and B-2 than in Groups A-1 and B-1 (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION: The Octopus electrodes were more efficient for creating a large ablation zone than clustered electrodes, and the efficacy of RFA with Octopus electrodes can be amplified in the switching monopolar mode.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22422385      PMCID: PMC3487075          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/61619687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  23 in total

Review 1.  Radiofrequency ablation of the liver: current status.

Authors:  J P McGhana; G D Dodd
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Radiofrequency ablation of the liver.

Authors:  T de Baere
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Multiple probe radiofrequency ablation: pilot study in an animal model.

Authors:  Fred T Lee; Dieter Haemmerich; Andrew S Wright; David M Mahvi; Lisa A Sampson; John G Webster
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 4.  Minimally invasive treatment of malignant hepatic tumors: at the threshold of a major breakthrough.

Authors:  G D Dodd; M C Soulen; R A Kane; T Livraghi; W R Lees; Y Yamashita; A R Gillams; O I Karahan; H Rhim
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  Radiofrequency thermal ablation: computer analysis of the size of the thermal injury created by overlapping ablations.

Authors:  G D Dodd; M S Frank; M Aribandi; S Chopra; K N Chintapalli
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 6.  Radiofrequency ablation of liver tumours: systematic review.

Authors:  Bart Decadt; Ajith K Siriwardena
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Treatment of focal liver tumors with percutaneous radio-frequency ablation: complications encountered in a multicenter study.

Authors:  Tito Livraghi; Luigi Solbiati; M Franca Meloni; G Scott Gazelle; Elkan F Halpern; S Nahum Goldberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Multipolar radiofrequency ablation: first clinical results.

Authors:  J Tacke; A Mahnken; A Roggan; R W Günther
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2004-03

9.  Large liver tumors: protocol for radiofrequency ablation and its clinical application in 110 patients--mathematic model, overlapping mode, and electrode placement process.

Authors:  Min-Hua Chen; Wei Yang; Kun Yan; Ming-Wu Zou; Luigi Solbiati; Ji-Bin Liu; Ying Dai
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Meta-analysis of radiofrequency ablation versus hepatic resection for small hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Yanming Zhou; Yanfang Zhao; Bin Li; Donghui Xu; Zhengfeng Yin; Feng Xie; Jiamei Yang
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 3.067

View more
  8 in total

1.  Comparison of therapeutic efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinomas between internally cooled 15-G and 17-G single electrodes.

Authors:  H J Park; M W Lee; K D Song; D I Cha; H Rhim; T W Kang; S Lim; H K Lim
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Irreversible Electroporation Enhanced by Radiofrequency Ablation: An In Vitro and Computational Study in a 3D Liver Tumor Model.

Authors:  Zheng Fang; Huimin Mao; Michael A J Moser; Wenjun Zhang; Zhiqin Qian; Bing Zhang
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Radiofrequency Ablation Using a Separable Clustered Electrode for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinomas: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Dual-Switching Monopolar Mode Versus a Single-Switching Monopolar Mode.

Authors:  Jae Won Choi; Jeong Min Lee; Dong Ho Lee; Jung Hwan Yoon; Yoon Jun Kim; Jeong Hoon Lee; Su Jong Yu; Eun Ju Cho
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  Evaluation of the in vivo efficiency and safety of hepatic radiofrequency ablation using a 15-G Octopus® in pig liver.

Authors:  Eun Sun Lee; Jeong Min Lee; Kyung Won Kim; In Joon Lee; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  Dual switching monopolar radiofrequency ablation using a separable clustered electrode: comparison with consecutive and switching monopolar modes in ex vivo bovine livers.

Authors:  Jeong-Hee Yoon; Jeong Min Lee; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  Monopolar radiofrequency ablation using a dual-switching system and a separable clustered electrode: evaluation of the in vivo efficiency.

Authors:  Jeong Hee Yoon; Jeong Min Lee; Eui Jin Hwang; In Pyung Hwang; Jeehyun Baek; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  Switching Monopolar Radiofrequency Ablation Using a Separable Cluster Electrode in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Jin Woo Choi; Jeong Min Lee; Dong Ho Lee; Jeong-Hee Yoon; Kyung-Suk Suh; Jung-Hwan Yoon; Yoon Jun Kim; Jeong-Hoon Lee; Su Jong Yu; Joon Koo Han
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Percutaneous Dual-Switching Monopolar Radiofrequency Ablation Using a Separable Clustered Electrode: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Tae Won Choi; Jeong Min Lee; Dong Ho Lee; Jeong-Hoon Lee; Su Jong Yu; Yoon Jun Kim; Jung-Hwan Yoon; Joon Koo Han
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.500

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.