Literature DB >> 11566672

Radiofrequency thermal ablation: computer analysis of the size of the thermal injury created by overlapping ablations.

G D Dodd1, M S Frank, M Aribandi, S Chopra, K N Chintapalli.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to perform a computer analysis of the size of the thermal injury created by overlapping multiple thermal ablation spheres.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A computer-assisted design system was used to create three-dimensional models of a spherical tumor, a spherical tissue volume consisting of the tumor plus a 1-cm tumor-free margin, and individual spherical ablations. These volumes were superimposed in real-time three-dimensional space in different geometric relationships. The effect of the size and geometric configuration of the ablation spheres was analyzed with regard to the ability to ablate the required volume of tissue (tumor plus margin) without leaving untreated areas or interstices.
RESULTS: The single-ablation model showed that if a 360-degree 1-cm tumor-free margin is included around the tumor targeted for ablation, radiofrequency ablation devices producing 3-, 4-, and 5-cm ablation spheres can be used to treat 1-, 2-, and 3-cm tumors, respectively. The six-sphere model, in which six ablation spheres are placed in orthogonal planes around the tumor, showed that the largest tumor that may be treated with a 3-cm ablation device is 1.75 cm, whereas 4- and 5-cm ablation spheres can be used to treat tumors measuring 3 and 4.25 cm, respectively. The 14- sphere model showed that addition of eight more spheres to the six-sphere model increased the treatable tumor size to 3, 4.6, or 6.3 cm, depending on the diameter of the ablation sphere used. For treating larger tumors, we found a cylindrical model to be less efficient but easier to control.
CONCLUSION: Our computer analysis showed that the size of the composite thermal injury created by overlapping multiple thermal ablation spheres is surprisingly small relative to the number of ablations performed. These results emphasize the need for a methodic tumor ablation strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11566672     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.177.4.1770777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  92 in total

1.  Feasibility of thermal ablation of lytic vertebral metastases with radiofrequency current.

Authors:  Bradford J Wood
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.360

2.  High-fidelity computer models for prospective treatment planning of radiofrequency ablation with in vitro experimental correlation.

Authors:  David Fuentes; Rex Cardan; R Jason Stafford; Joshua Yung; Gerald D Dodd; Yusheng Feng
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 3.  Principles of and advances in percutaneous ablation.

Authors:  Muneeb Ahmed; Christopher L Brace; Fred T Lee; S Nahum Goldberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Bipolar radiofrequency ablation in ex vivo bovine liver with the open-perfused system versus the cooled-wet system.

Authors:  Jeong Min Lee; Joon Koo Han; Se Hyung Kim; Kyu Li Sohn; Seung Hong Choi; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-07-10       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Multiple-electrode radiofrequency ablations using Octopus® electrodes in an in vivo porcine liver model.

Authors:  E S Lee; J M Lee; W S Kim; S H Choi; I Joo; M Kim; D H Yoo; R-E Yoo; J K Han; B I Choi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Maximizing parameters for tissue ablation by using an internally cooled electrode.

Authors:  John P McGahan; Shaun Loh; Fernando J Boschini; Eric E Paoli; John M Brock; Wayne L Monsky; Chin-Shang Li
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Ablation techniques for primary and metastatic liver tumors.

Authors:  Michael J Ryan; Jonathon Willatt; Bill S Majdalany; Ania Z Kielar; Suzanne Chong; Julie A Ruma; Amit Pandya
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2016-01-28

Review 8.  Radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors.

Authors:  Shaunagh McDermott; Debra A Gervais
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.513

9.  A surgical device for radiofrequency ablation of large liver tumors.

Authors:  I dos Santos; D Correia; A J M Soares; J A Góes; A F da Rocha; D Schutt; D Haemmerich
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 2.833

Review 10.  Radiofrequency ablation of cancer.

Authors:  Marc Friedman; Igor Mikityansky; Anthony Kam; Steven K Libutti; McClellan M Walther; Ziv Neeman; Julia K Locklin; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 2.740

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.