Literature DB >> 22422031

Vitreo-papillary adhesion as a prognostic factor in pseudo- and lamellar macular holes.

M R Romano1, J L Vallejo-Garcia, F I Camesasca, P Vinciguerra, C Costagliola.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of vitreopapillary adhesion (VPA) and to investigate its value as a prognostic factor in the surgical outcome of pseudo- (PMH) and lamellar macular holes (LMH).
METHODS: A total of 76 consecutive patients, diagnosed with PMH (41 eyes) or LMH (35 eyes) were included. Eyes with VPA were alternatively assigned to the surgical or control group. Surgery consisted of a 25G vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peeling with blue dye staining. There were six visits: baseline, the day of surgery, and 1, 3, 6, and 9 post-operative months. Main outcome measures were the incidence of VPA and changes in the outer retinal layers and visual acuity.
RESULTS: VPA was found in 27% (11/41) of patients with PMH and 37% (13/35) with LMH (P=0.03). In presence of VPA, the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved in the surgery group from 32 ± 8 to 47 ± 8 letters, whereas the control group went from 34 ± 7 to 31 ± 8 letters. The difference in letters between the surgery and control groups was statistically significant for both distance (P=0.032) and near (P=0.04) vision. Intra-retinal cysts were significantly correlated with a poor functional prognosis (P=0.01). We found the presence of focal damage to the outer retinal layers in LMH and PMH.
CONCLUSION: VPA is more frequent in the presence of LMH vsPMH. It significantly influences the tangential forces at the vitreoretinal interface, exacerbating anatomical changes, and worsening the functional prognosis. Functional difference between the surgical and control groups was statistically significant for distant and near vision in presence of VPA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22422031      PMCID: PMC3376289          DOI: 10.1038/eye.2012.43

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  20 in total

1.  Macular hole formation: new data provided by optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  A Gaudric; B Haouchine; P Massin; M Paques; P Blain; A Erginay
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-06

2.  High-resolution imaging of the photoreceptor layer in epiretinal membrane using adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.

Authors:  Sotaro Ooto; Masanori Hangai; Kohei Takayama; Atsushi Sakamoto; Akitaka Tsujikawa; Susumu Oshima; Takashi Inoue; Nagahisa Yoshimura
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Diagnosis of macular pseudoholes and lamellar macular holes by optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Belkacem Haouchine; Pascale Massin; Ramin Tadayoni; Ali Erginay; Alain Gaudric
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Three-dimensional retinal imaging with high-speed ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Maciej Wojtkowski; Vivek Srinivasan; James G Fujimoto; Tony Ko; Joel S Schuman; Andrzej Kowalczyk; Jay S Duker
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Macular holes and macular pucker: the role of vitreoschisis as imaged by optical coherence tomography/scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.

Authors:  Jerry Sebag; Priya Gupta; Richard R Rosen; Patricia Garcia; Alfredo A Sadun
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2007

6.  Foveal pseudocyst as the first step in macular hole formation: a prospective study by optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  B Haouchine; P Massin; A Gaudric
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Anatomic and visual outcomes of vitrectomy for lamellar macular holes.

Authors:  Andre J Witkin; Leonardo C Castro; Elias Reichel; Adam H Rogers; Caroline R Baumal; Jay S Duker
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug

8.  Lamellar macular hole: a complication of cystoid macular edema after cataract extraction.

Authors:  J D Gass
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1976-05

9.  Redefining lamellar holes and the vitreomacular interface: an ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography study.

Authors:  Andre J Witkin; Tony H Ko; James G Fujimoto; Joel S Schuman; Caroline R Baumal; Adam H Rogers; Elias Reichel; Jay S Duker
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Vitreoschisis.

Authors:  J Sebag
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 3.117

View more
  9 in total

1.  Long-term follow-up of fellow eye in patients with lamellar macular hole.

Authors:  Ugo Nava; Matteo Giuseppe Cereda; Ferdinando Bottoni; Chiara Preziosa; Marco Pellegrini; Andrea Giani; Giovanni Staurenghi
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Macular peeling-induced retinal damage: clinical and histopathological evaluation after using different dyes.

Authors:  Mario R Romano; Gennaro Ilardi; Mariantonia Ferrara; Gilda Cennamo; Barbara Parolini; Cesare Mariotti; Stefania Staibano; Giovanni Cennamo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Deep and superficial OCT angiography changes after macular peeling: idiopathic vs diabetic epiretinal membranes.

Authors:  Mario R Romano; Gilda Cennamo; Stefano Schiemer; Claudia Rossi; Federica Sparnelli; Giovanni Cennamo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 4.  Retinal Changes Induced by Epiretinal Tangential Forces.

Authors:  Mario R Romano; Chiara Comune; Mariantonia Ferrara; Gilda Cennamo; Stefano De Cillà; Lisa Toto; Giovanni Cennamo
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 5.  Ocriplasmin: who is the best candidate?

Authors:  Claudia M Prospero Ponce; William Stevenson; Rachel Gelman; Daniel R Agarwal; John B Christoforidis
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-17

6.  Prospective study of vitrectomy for epiretinal membranes in patients with good best-corrected visual acuity.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Nakashizuka; Yorihisa Kitagawa; Yu Wakatsuki; Koji Tanaka; Koichi Furuya; Takayuki Hattori; Ryusaburo Mori; Hiroyuki Shimada
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 2.209

Review 7.  Primary Lamellar Macular Holes: To Vit or Not to Vit.

Authors:  Lihteh Wu; Ryan Bradshaw
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-28       Impact factor: 4.964

8.  Surgical therapy versus observation for lamellar macular hole: a retrospective comparison study.

Authors:  Huseyin Sanisoglu; Ahmet Elbay; Sahin Sevim; Ugur Celik; Fatma B Aktas; Ebubekir Durmus
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-09-18

Review 9.  The Management of Lamellar Macular Holes: A Review.

Authors:  Ciprian Danielescu; Horia Tudor Stanca; Florian Balta
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 1.909

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.