Literature DB >> 11150257

Foveal pseudocyst as the first step in macular hole formation: a prospective study by optical coherence tomography.

B Haouchine1, P Massin, A Gaudric.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish the natural history of a series of impending macular holes presenting as foveal pseudocysts using optical coherence tomography (OCT).
DESIGN: In a prospective observational case series, patients exhibiting a foveal pseudocyst on biomicroscopy were examined with OCT and were followed up for 3 to 26 months (mean, 9.4 months) PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-two eyes of 20 consecutive patients examined for a macular hole in the fellow eye or reporting visual symptoms in only one eye, in whom a foveal pseudocyst was diagnosed on OCT.
METHODS: In all cases, fundus biomicroscopy and OCT findings were compared. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Biomicroscopic fundoscopy, OCT scans, and visual acuity.
RESULTS: Eight foveal pseudocysts occurred in the fellow eye of an eye with a macular hole, and 14 were diagnosed in patients with unilateral visual symptoms. In four of the 22 eyes, the macula was considered normal on biomicroscopy. In the 18 others, biomicroscopy detected a foveal pseudocyst, radial striae, a yellow spot or ring, or a combination of these findings. No posterior vitreous detachment was seen on biomicroscopy in any of the eyes. On OCT, the cystoid space occupied the inner part of the foveal tissue in the stage 1A impending hole; a stage 1B impending hole corresponded to a cystoid space that extended posteriorly, disrupting the outer retinal layer. During the follow-up period, three pseudocysts evolved into full-thickness macular holes, four turned into lamellar holes, seven resolved completely after detachment of the posterior hyaloid, and eight remained unchanged for a long time.
CONCLUSIONS: Foveal pseudocysts are a specific entity occurring either as a primary ocular involvement or in the fellow eye of an eye with a macular hole. Foveal pseudocysts are the first step of full thickness macular hole formation, but they also may evolve into a lamellar hole, may persist unchanged for months, or may resolve completely. Foveal pseudocyst formation may be the result of the incomplete separation of the vitreous cortex at the foveal center and the particular structure of the foveal Müller cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11150257     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00519-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  60 in total

1.  [Retinal ICG-accumulation after ILM-staining during macular hole surgery?].

Authors:  I Krömer; A Lommatzsch; D Pauleikhoff
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  [Transitory reduction of vision without metamorphopsia].

Authors:  R F Degenring; B Kamppeter; G Sauder; J B Jonas
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  [OCT in macular holes].

Authors:  A Hassenstein; F Scholz; G Richard
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Evolution from macular pseudohole to lamellar macular hole - spectral domain OCT study.

Authors:  Janusz Michalewski; Zofia Michalewska; Krzysztof Dzięgielewski; Jerzy Nawrocki
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Spontaneous outer retinal closure of stage 1B macular hole without vitreofoveal separation.

Authors:  Atsushi Takahashi; Taiji Nagaoka; Yuji Kato; Satoshi Ishiko; Akitoshi Yoshida
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-04-03       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  The design and validation of an optical coherence tomography-based classification system for focal vitreomacular traction.

Authors:  D H W Steel; L Downey; K Greiner; H Heimann; T L Jackson; Z Koshy; D A H Laidlaw; L Wickham; Y Yang
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Vitreo-retinal interface changes on optical coherence tomography in the fellow eyes of patients with macular hole.

Authors:  Ajit Babu Majji; Jay Kumar Chhablani; Bupesh Bagga
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 8.  [Macular hole. Survey and relevant surgical concepts].

Authors:  S Dithmar
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.059

9.  Relationship between macular hole size and the potential benefit of internal limiting membrane peeling.

Authors:  R Tadayoni; A Gaudric; B Haouchine; P Massin
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Relationship between macular hole size and the potential benefit of internal limiting membrane peeling.

Authors:  G A Williams
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.