Literature DB >> 22421891

Human mesenchymal stem cells and biomaterials interaction: a promising synergy to improve spine fusion.

G Barbanti Brodano1, E Mazzoni, M Tognon, C Griffoni, M Manfrini.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Spine fusion is the gold standard treatment in degenerative and traumatic spine diseases. The bone regenerative medicine needs (i) in vitro functionally active osteoblasts, and/or (ii) the in vivo induction of the tissue. The bone tissue engineering seems to be a very promising approach for the effectiveness of orthopedic surgical procedures, clinical applications are often hampered by the limited availability of bone allograft or substitutes. New biomaterials have been recently developed for the orthopedic applications. The main characteristics of these scaffolds are the ability to induce the bone tissue formation by generating an appropriate environment for (i) the cell growth and (ii) recruiting precursor bone cells for the proliferation and differentiation. A new prototype of biomaterials known as "bioceramics" may own these features. Bioceramics are bone substitutes mainly composed of calcium and phosphate complex salt derivatives.
METHODS: In this study, the characteristics bioceramics bone substitutes have been tested with human mesenchymal stem cells obtained from the bone marrow of adult orthopedic patients.
RESULTS: These cellular models can be employed to characterize in vitro the behavior of different biomaterials, which are used as bone void fillers or three-dimensional scaffolds.
CONCLUSIONS: Human mesenchymal stem cells in combination with biomaterials seem to be good alternative to the autologous or allogenic bone fusion in spine surgery. The cellular model used in our study is a useful tool for investigating cytocompatibility and biological features of HA-derived scaffolds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22421891      PMCID: PMC3325383          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2233-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  19 in total

1.  Grafton and local bone have comparable outcomes to iliac crest bone in instrumented single-level lumbar fusions.

Authors:  James Kang; Howard An; Alan Hilibrand; S Tim Yoon; Eoin Kavanagh; Scott Boden
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Adult mesenchymal stem cells: characterization, differentiation, and application in cell and gene therapy.

Authors:  D Baksh; L Song; R S Tuan
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2004 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 5.310

3.  The effect of substratum topography on osteoblast adhesion mediated signal transduction and phosphorylation.

Authors:  Douglas W Hamilton; Donald M Brunette
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 4.  Bone grafts and bone graft substitutes in orthopaedic trauma surgery. A critical analysis.

Authors:  William G De Long; Thomas A Einhorn; Kenneth Koval; Michael McKee; Wade Smith; Roy Sanders; Tracy Watson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  James N Weinstein; Jon D Lurie; Tor D Tosteson; Brett Hanscom; Anna N A Tosteson; Emily A Blood; Nancy J O Birkmeyer; Alan S Hilibrand; Harry Herkowitz; Frank P Cammisa; Todd J Albert; Sanford E Emery; Lawrence G Lenke; William A Abdu; Michael Longley; Thomas J Errico; Serena S Hu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  The use of osteo-conductive stem-cells allograft in lumbar interbody fusion procedures: an alternative to recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein.

Authors:  Eubulus J Kerr; Ajay Jawahar; Terry Wooten; Stephen Kay; David A Cavanaugh; Pierce D Nunley
Journal:  J Surg Orthop Adv       Date:  2011

7.  Evaluation of carriers of bone morphogenetic protein for spinal fusion.

Authors:  A Minamide; M Kawakami; H Hashizume; R Sakata; T Tamaki
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  The effect of biomimetic apatite structure on osteoblast viability, proliferation, and gene expression.

Authors:  Yu-Fen Chou; Weibiao Huang; James C Y Dunn; Timothy A Miller; Benjamin M Wu
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Donor site pain from the ilium. A complication of lumbar spine fusion.

Authors:  B N Summers; S M Eisenstein
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1989-08

10.  Three-dimensional degradable porous polymer-ceramic matrices for use in bone repair.

Authors:  J E Devin; M A Attawia; C T Laurencin
Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.517

View more
  10 in total

1.  Mesenchymal stem cells derived from vertebrae (vMSCs) show best biological properties.

Authors:  Giovanni Barbanti Brodano; Silvia Terzi; Luisa Trombi; Cristiana Griffoni; Mauro Valtieri; Stefano Boriani; Maria Cristina Magli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Recent updates on the biological basis of heterogeneity in bone marrow stromal cells/skeletal stem cells.

Authors:  Deepika Arora; Pamela Gehron Robey
Journal:  Biomater Transl       Date:  2022-03-28

3.  The potential role of regenerative medicine in the man-agement of traumatic patients.

Authors:  Mahmoudreza Moradi; Brandy Hood; Marzieh Moradi; Anthony Atala
Journal:  J Inj Violence Res       Date:  2014-12-13

Review 4.  Mesenchymal Stem Cells for the Treatment of Spinal Arthrodesis: From Preclinical Research to Clinical Scenario.

Authors:  F Salamanna; M Sartori; G Barbanti Brodano; C Griffoni; L Martini; S Boriani; M Fini
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 5.443

5.  Vertebral body versus iliac crest bone marrow as a source of multipotential stromal cells: Comparison of processing techniques, tri-lineage differentiation and application on a scaffold for spine fusion.

Authors:  Evangelos M Fragkakis; Jehan Jomaa El-Jawhari; Robert A Dunsmuir; Peter A Millner; Abhay S Rao; Karen T Henshaw; Ippokratis Pountos; Elena Jones; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Innovative Biomaterials for Bone Regrowth.

Authors:  Maria Rosa Iaquinta; Elisa Mazzoni; Marco Manfrini; Antonio D'Agostino; Lorenzo Trevisiol; Riccardo Nocini; Leonardo Trombelli; Giovanni Barbanti-Brodano; Fernanda Martini; Mauro Tognon
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  Advances of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells-based biomaterial scaffolds for oral and maxillofacial tissue engineering.

Authors:  Tong Liu; Jia Xu; Xun Pan; Zhangfan Ding; Hao Xie; Xiaoyi Wang; Huixu Xie
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-01-30

Review 8.  Long Non-coding RNAs and MicroRNAs Interplay in Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Authors:  Carmen Lanzillotti; Monica De Mattei; Chiara Mazziotta; Francesca Taraballi; John Charles Rotondo; Mauro Tognon; Fernanda Martini
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-04-09

Review 9.  MicroRNAs Modulate Signaling Pathways in Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Authors:  Chiara Mazziotta; Carmen Lanzillotti; Maria Rosa Iaquinta; Francesca Taraballi; Elena Torreggiani; John Charles Rotondo; Lucia Otòn-Gonzalez; Elisa Mazzoni; Francesca Frontini; Ilaria Bononi; Monica De Mattei; Mauro Tognon; Fernanda Martini
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 6.208

10.  Hydroxylapatite-collagen hybrid scaffold induces human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells to osteogenic differentiation in vitro and bone regrowth in patients.

Authors:  Elisa Mazzoni; Antonio D'Agostino; Maria Rosa Iaquinta; Ilaria Bononi; Lorenzo Trevisiol; John Charles Rotondo; Simone Patergnani; Carlotta Giorgi; Michael J Gunson; G William Arnett; Pier Francesco Nocini; Mauro Tognon; Fernanda Martini
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 6.940

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.