Literature DB >> 22421854

Straight and angulated abutments in platform switching: influence of loading on bone stress by three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Ana Paula Martini1, Amílcar Chagas Freitas, Eduardo Passos Rocha, Erika Oliveira de Almeida, Rodolfo Bruniera Anchieta, Sidney Kina, Guilherme Bortolon Fasolo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In view of reports in the literature on the benefits achieved with the use of platform switching, described as the use of an implant with a larger diameter than the abutment diameter, the goal being to prevent the (previously) normal bone loss down to the first thread that occurs around most implants, thus enhancing soft tissue aesthetics and stability and the need for implant inclination due to bone anatomy in some cases, the aim of this study was to evaluate bone stress distribution on peri-implant bone, by using three-dimensional finite element analysis to simulate the influence of implants with different abutment angulations (0 and 15 degrees) in platform switching.
METHODS: Four mathematical models of an implant-supported central incisor were created with varying abutment angulations: straight abutment (S1 and S2) and angulated abutment at 15 degrees (A1 and A2), submitted to 2 loading conditions (100 N): S1 and A1-oblique loading (45 degrees) and S2 and A2-axial loading, parallel to the long axis of the implant. Maximum (σmax) and minimum (σmin) principal stress values were obtained for cortical and trabecular bone.
RESULTS: Models S1 and A1 showed higher σmax in cortical and trabecular bone when compared with S2 and A2. The highest σmax values (in MPa) in the cortical bone were found in S1 (28.5), followed by A1 (25.7), S2 (11.6), and A2 (5.15). For the trabecular bone, the highest σmax values were found in S1 (7.53), followed by A1 (2.87), S2 (2.85), and A2 (1.47).
CONCLUSIONS: Implants with straight abutments generated the highest stress values in bone. In addition, this effect was potentiated when the load was applied obliquely.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22421854     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31824b9c17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  5 in total

1.  Stress distribution in the transitional peri-implant bone in a single implant-supported prosthesis with platform-switching under different angulated loads.

Authors:  Ángel Álvarez-Arenal; Luis Segura-Mori; Ignacio Gonzalez-Gonzalez; Hector DeLlanos-Lanchares; Fernando Sanchez-Lasheras; Joseba Ellacuria-Echevarria
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Influence of Implant Tilting and Length on the Biomechanics of Single-Tooth Restoration: A Finite Element Analysis in Atrophic Mandible.

Authors:  Eduardo Anitua; Naiara Larrazabal Saez de Ibarra; Iñigo Morales Martín; Luis Saracho Rotaeche
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-06

3.  A further finite element stress analysis of angled abutments for an implant placed in the anterior maxilla.

Authors:  Dong Wu; Kebin Tian; Jiang Chen; Hua Jin; Wenxiu Huang; Yuyu Liu
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 2.238

4.  The effect of implant angulation and splinting on stress distribution in implant body and supporting bone: A finite element analysis.

Authors:  Ebadian Behnaz; Mosharraf Ramin; Samaneh Abbasi; Memar Ardestani Pouya; Farzin Mahmood
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

Review 5.  The Prosthetic Influence and Biomechanics on Peri-Implant Strain: a Systematic Literature Review of Finite Element Studies.

Authors:  Julius Maminskas; Algirdas Puisys; Ritva Kuoppala; Aune Raustia; Gintaras Juodzbalys
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2016-09-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.