Literature DB >> 26943357

Stress distribution in the transitional peri-implant bone in a single implant-supported prosthesis with platform-switching under different angulated loads.

Ángel Álvarez-Arenal1, Luis Segura-Mori2, Ignacio Gonzalez-Gonzalez1, Hector DeLlanos-Lanchares1, Fernando Sanchez-Lasheras3, Joseba Ellacuria-Echevarria4.   

Abstract

A 3D finite element analysis was conducted to evaluate and compare the stress distribution in the peri-implant bone (transitional cortical and trabecular bone) of one single implant-supported crown with platform switching and another without platform switching, under a vertical and an oblique load. Two models were created, simulating an osseointegrated implant (4 × 13 mm, platform 4.1 mm) embedded in the jaw bone. One model simulated a 4.1-mm diameter abutment connection (conventional model) and the other a 3.8-mm diameter abutment connection (platform-switching model). A crown with a Co-Cr alloy framework and feldspathic porcelain veneering was applied over the titanium abutment. Static, vertical and oblique loads (0°, 15°, 30°, 45°) with a maximum value of 150 N were applied to the crown. For any inclination of the applied load, the stress values in the transitional cortical bone were lower in the platform-switching model than in the conventional model. However, the stress in the transitional trabecular bone was higher in the platform-switching model than in the conventional model. Stress values increased when the load was more oblique at the transitional cortical bone in both models and was slightly reduced at the transitional trabecular bone of the conventional model. The platform-switching technique reduces the stress at the transitional cortical bone. In both models, this stress gradually increases as the load becomes more inclined. The transitional trabecular bone shows lower stress values than the transitional cortical bone. The location of stress is similar in both models.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angulated load; Finite element analysis; Platform-switching; Stress; Transitional periimplant bone

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26943357     DOI: 10.1007/s10266-016-0237-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Odontology        ISSN: 1618-1247            Impact factor:   2.634


  39 in total

1.  Measurement of masticatory forces and implant loads: a methodologic clinical study.

Authors:  Thomas R Morneburg; Peter A Pröschel
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.681

2.  In vivo forces on implants influenced by occlusal scheme and food consistency.

Authors:  Thomas R Morneburg; Peter A Pröschel
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.681

Review 3.  A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff's Law for clinicians.

Authors:  Harold M Frost
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 4.  Platform switching for marginal bone preservation around dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Momen A Atieh; Hadeel M Ibrahim; Ahmad H Atieh
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.993

5.  Platform switching: a new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels.

Authors:  Richard J Lazzara; Stephan S Porter
Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effect of platform switching on implant crest bone stress: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Jason Schrotenboer; Yi-Pin Tsao; Vipul Kinariwala; Hom-Lay Wang
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.454

7.  Influence of prosthesis material on stress distribution in bone and implant: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  R Stegaroiu; H Kusakari; S Nishiyama; O Miyakawa
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Influence of fine threads and platform-switching on crestal bone stress around implant-a three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  Pardeep Khurana; Arun Sharma; Kiranmeet Kaur Sodhi
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 1.779

9.  Regular and platform switching: bone stress analysis varying implant type.

Authors:  Nália Cecília Gurgel-Juarez; Erika Oliveira de Almeida; Eduardo Passos Rocha; Amílcar Chagas Freitas; Rodolfo Bruniera Anchieta; Luis Carlos Merçon de Vargas; Sidney Kina; Fabiana Mantovani Gomes França
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Immediately loaded titanium implant with a tissue-stabilizing/maintaining design ('beyond platform switch') retrieved from man after 4 weeks: a histological and histomorphometrical evaluation. A case report.

Authors:  Marco Degidi; Giovanna Iezzi; Antonio Scarano; Adriano Piattelli
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 5.977

View more
  2 in total

1.  Biomechanical Consequences of the Elastic Properties of Dental Implant Alloys on the Supporting Bone: Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Esteban Pérez-Pevida; Aritza Brizuela-Velasco; David Chávarri-Prado; Antonio Jiménez-Garrudo; Fernando Sánchez-Lasheras; Eneko Solaberrieta-Méndez; Markel Diéguez-Pereira; Felipe J Fernández-González; Borja Dehesa-Ibarra; Francesca Monticelli
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Consequences of Peri-Implant Bone Loss in the Occlusal Load Transfer to the Supporting Bone in terms of Magnitude of Stress, Strain, and Stress Distribution: A Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Esteban Pérez-Pevida; David Chávarri-Prado; Markel Diéguez-Pereira; Alejandro Estrada-Martínez; Oier Montalbán-Vadillo; Antonio Jiménez-Garrudo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 3.411

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.