| Literature DB >> 22420715 |
Vanessa A Curtis1, Aaron L Carrel, Jens C Eickhoff, David B Allen.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Increasing obesity and poor cardiovascular fitness (CVF) contribute to higher rates of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in children. While the relative contributions of fitness and body fat on development of insulin resistance (IR) in children and adolescents remains unresolved, gender- and race-specific differences likely exist in the degree to which CVF influences IR and risk for T2DM. Better understanding of how gender and race affect interactions between body fat, CVF, and metabolic health would be helpful in designing effective and targeted strategies to reduce obesity-associated disease risk. We evaluated whether metabolic benefits of fitness on reducing inflammation and insulin resistance (IR) are affected by gender and race.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22420715 PMCID: PMC3353855 DOI: 10.1186/1687-9856-2012-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Pediatr Endocrinol ISSN: 1687-9848
Participant characteristics
| Total | Male | Female | NHW | Racially diverse | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 12.2(±0.9) | 12.2(±0.8) | 12.2(±1.0) | 12.2(±0.9) | 12.1(±0.9) |
| BMI z-score | 0.64(±1.00) | 0.63(±1.07) | 0.64(±0.95) | 0.37(±0.93) | 0.86(±1.01) |
| Overweight | 40(19.7%) | 21(20.6%) | 19(18.8%) | 20(21.3%) | 20(18.3%) |
| Obese | 37(18.2%) | 20(19.6%) | 17(16.8%) | 6(6.4%) | 31(28.4%) |
| Fitness (PACER laps) | 32.4(±17.2) | 37.5(±19.5) | 27.2(±12.5) | 36.2(±18.5) | 29.0(±15.2) |
Data are means ± SE. "Overweight" and "Obese" represent the individuals whose BMI is between the 85-95th %ile and >95th %ile, respectively, based on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention statistics for age and sex
Distribution of subject based on PACER and hsCRp
| N | % | |
|---|---|---|
| PACER percentile (age/gender specific) | ||
| <33% | 46 | 23% |
| 33-67% | 90 | 44% |
| >67% | 67 | 33% |
| hsCRP | ||
| <0.5 mg/L | 115 | 57% |
| >0.5 mg/L | 88 | 43% |
Percentages of subjects with elevated hsCRP levels by Gender and Race
| % Subjects with hsCRP >0.5 mg/L | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low fitness (n = 46) | High fitness (n = 67) | p-value1 | p-value2 | ||
| Gender | Male (n = 58) | 65% | 11% | <0.001 | 0.28 |
| Female (n = 55) | 70% | 25% | 0.0014 | ||
| Race | Non-Hispanic White (n = 56) | 67% | 24% | 0.0035 | 0.06 |
| Racially Diverse (n = 57) | 68% | 8% | <0.0001 | ||
1p-value for comparison between "low fitness" vs. "high fitness" group
2p-value for evaluating interaction between gender and fitness, race and fitness
Percentage of non-overweight subjects with elevated hsCRP in high and low fitness categories
| % Subjects with hsCRP >0.5 ng/ml | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Low Fitness (n = 17) | High Fitness (n = 60) | p-value | |
| Male (n = 37) | 57% | 3% | 0.0031 |
| Female (n = 40) | 50% | 26% | 0.2461 |
| p-value | 0.0262 | 0.0743 | |
1p-value for comparing between fitness levels, stratified by gender
2p-value for comparing between gender, stratified by fitness levels
3p-value for evaluating interaction between gender and fitness