Literature DB >> 18450233

Formula labeling violations to the WHO Code: a quantitative and qualitative analysis.

Ana M Parrilla-Rodríguez1, José J Gorrín-Peralta.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The WHO Code on Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes is intended to be adopted as a minimum requirement by all governments and aims to protect infant health by preventing inappropriate marketing of breastmilk substitutes. Labels need to have correct and clear dispositions since they frequently are the only source of vital information for consumers regarding the content of the product and its uses.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine violations to the provisions of the International Code Article 9 regarding infant formula labeling existing in Puerto Rico.
METHODS: A quantitative and qualitative evaluation of 34 labels of infant formula was done. Instrument 4-A of the IBFAN Monitoring Project (IMPIII) and the Standard IBFAN Monitoring (SIM) was utilized. This instrument included 14 criteria that identified violations to the International Code of Breastmilk Substitutes on labeling. Descriptive analysis was used for all variables. The 34 labels evaluated represent 77.3% of infant formula labels of the four companies which market them in the island.
RESULTS: All the labels (100%) that were evaluated were found to violate the Code in one or more of its dispositions. Most striking violations include: a statement that breastfeeding is best is lacking in 73.5%, as well as a statement that the product should be used only on the advice of a health worker. None of the labels are written in Spanish, the local language. Text which may idealize the use of infant formula or discourage breastfeeding is present in 97.1% of the samples, and the same percentage has a photo or picture idealizing the use of infant formula.
CONCLUSIONS: It is vital to produce legislation that implants the WHO Code in Puerto Rico in order to regulate indiscriminate marketing practices and their subsequent ill effects on children's health and breastfeeding practices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18450233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  P R Health Sci J        ISSN: 0738-0658            Impact factor:   0.705


  6 in total

1.  Corporate image and public health: an analysis of the Philip Morris, Kraft, and Nestlé websites.

Authors:  Elizabeth Smith
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2012-03-16

2.  Compliance status of product labels to the international code on marketing of breast milk substitutes.

Authors:  Ahmet Ergin; Celile Hatipoğlu; Ali Ihsan Bozkurt; Aslı Erdoğan; Serdar Güler; Gülberat Ince; Nuran Kavurgacı; Ahmet Oz; Mustafa K Yeniay
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-01

3.  Readability and Content Characteristics of Powdered Infant Formula Instructions in the United States.

Authors:  Lorraine S Wallace; Patricia Fine Rosenstein; Noga Gal
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-04

4.  Violations of the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes in Mexico.

Authors:  Sonia Hernández-Cordero; Ana Lilia Lozada-Tequeanes; Teresa Shamah-Levy; Chessa Lutter; Teresita González de Cosío; Pedro Saturno-Hernández; Juan Rivera Dommarco; Laurence Grummer-Strawn
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Translating the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes into national measures in nine countries.

Authors:  Isabelle Michaud-Létourneau; Marion Gayard; David Louis Pelletier
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Misperceptions and misuse of Bear Brand coffee creamer as infant food: national cross sectional survey of consumers and paediatricians in Laos.

Authors:  Hubert Barennes; Todisoa Andriatahina; Vattanaphone Latthaphasavang; Margot Anderson; Leila M Srour
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-09-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.