| Literature DB >> 22419890 |
Changsong Zhang1, Yang Ling, Chenghui Zhang, Yun Xu, Lu Gao, Rong Li, Jing Zhu, Lieying Fan, Lixin Wei.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the promoter methylation status of RECK gene and mRNA expression in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Entities:
Keywords: RECK; hepatocellular carcinoma; methylation.
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22419890 PMCID: PMC3303171 DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.4038
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Biol Sci ISSN: 1449-2288 Impact factor: 6.580
Fig 1The expression of RECK mRNA in HCC tissues. (A)The RECK mRNA was indicated in HCC and Non-Hcc samples. Data are shown by the Mean -∆CT and 95%CI. The RECK mRNA in HCC was lower than that in the matched Non-Hcc tissues (p = 0.005). (B,C) There was a decreased tendency for RECK expression from Non-Hcc tissues to HCC. Expression of RECK was elevated (-∆∆Ct>=0) in only 24 of the 74 HCC patients but decreased (-∆∆Ct<0) in 50 of the patients. Statistical analyses were done using the paired t test.
Correlation of clinicophthologic variables with RECK mRNA in HCC.
| Variable | No.(74) | Mean-∆ct ( ± SE) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 65 | -0.87 ( ± 0.33) | 0.974 |
| Female | 9 | -0.90 ( ± 0.51) | ||
| Age(y) | >= 50 | 34 | -1.04 ( ± 0.37) | 0.616 |
| < 50 | 40 | -0.73 ( ± 0.45) | ||
| HBV history | Yes | 43 | -0.52 ( ± 0.40) | 0.169 |
| No | 31 | -1.36 ( ± 0.44) | ||
| Differentiation | G1 | 62 | -0.64 ( ± 0.33) | 0.071 |
| G2-3 | 12 | -2.10 ( ± 0.55) | ||
| Cirrhosis | Yes | 39 | -0.75 ( ± 0.43) | 0.662 |
| No | 35 | -1.01 ( ± 0.42) | ||
| Tobacco | Yes | 33 | -0.87 ( ± 0.44) | 0.984 |
| No | 41 | -0.88 ( ± 0.41) | ||
| Alcohol | Yes | 14 | -0.38 ( ± 0.75) | 0.431 |
| No | 60 | -0.99 ( ± 0.33) | ||
| HBV | >= 105 | 25 | -1.09 ( ± 0.55) | 0.601 |
| < 105 | 49 | -0.76 ( ± 0.35) | ||
| AFP | >= 30 | 45 | -0.40 ( ± 0.37) | 0.072 |
| < 30 | 29 | -1.50 ( ± 0.49) |
* Statistical significance determined using the independent samples test.
Fig 2RECK mRNA associated with poor prognosis in HCC. Kaplan-Meier analysis of survival months after surgery according to RECK mRNA level. The decreased Expression of RECK (-∆∆Ct<0) were significantly correlated with poor overall survival after surgery.
Fig 3The methylation frequency of RECK promoter in HCC patients by MSP. Representative H&E staining in HCC (A) and the matched Non-Hcc tissues (B). (C) Methylation of RECK promoter in HCC and corresponding Non-Hcc tissues. M, hypermethylation; PM, partial methylation; U, unmethylation; (D) Representative patterns of RECK promoter methylation. U, reaction specific for unmethylated DNA; M, reaction specific for methylated DNA. -∆Ct, - (CTRECK - CTβ-actin).
Fig 5Effect of 5-aza-CdR and TSA on expression of RECK mRNA in liver cell lines. (A) The RECK mRNA was detected by real-time PCR for 7721, Chang, and Hep-G2 treated with 5-aza-CdR, TSA, alone or combination. (B) It indicated that RECK demethylation induced significantly by TSA or TSA in 7721, Chang and Hep-G2 cells.