Literature DB >> 16132376

Prognostic significance of reversion-inducing cysteine-rich protein with Kazal motifs expression in resected pathologic stage IIIA N2 non-small-cell lung cancer.

Kazumasa Takenaka1, Shinya Ishikawa, Kazuhiro Yanagihara, Ryo Miyahara, Seiki Hasegawa, Yosuke Otake, Yoko Morioka, Chiaki Takahashi, Makoto Noda, Harumi Ito, Hiromi Wada, Fumihiro Tanaka.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reversion-inducing cysteine-rich protein with Kazal motifs (RECK) is a novel membrane-anchored matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, and experimental studies have shown that RECK can suppress tumor progression through angiogenesis inhibition. We have already revealed that enhanced RECK expression is significantly correlated with a favorable prognosis in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, further analyses focused on pN2 disease were conducted to assess the clinical significance of RECK expression.
METHODS: A total of 118 patients with completely resected pathologic stage IIIA N2 NSCLC were retrospectively examined. RECK expression in the primary tumor, along with involved N2 nodes, was examined immunohistochemically.
RESULTS: RECK expression in the primary tumor was strong in 53 patients (44.9%) and was weak in the other 65 patients. The 5-year survival rate of patients with RECK-strong tumor (42.9%) was significantly higher than that of patients with RECK-weak tumor (23.1%; P = .017). Reduced RECK expression significantly correlated with a poor prognosis for patients with a single N2 node involved (P = .019), but not for patients with multiple N2 nodes involved (P = .440). A multivariate analysis confirmed that reduced RECK expression was an independent and significant factor to predict a poor prognosis (P = .031). RECK expression in involved N2 nodes was significantly higher than in primary tumors (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: RECK status was a novel prognostic factor in pathologic stage IIIA N2 NSCLC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16132376     DOI: 10.1245/ASO.2005.09.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  8 in total

1.  The metalloproteinase inhibitor Reck is essential for zebrafish DRG development.

Authors:  Andrew Prendergast; Tor H Linbo; Tanya Swarts; Josette M Ungos; Hillary F McGraw; Shlomo Krispin; Brant M Weinstein; David W Raible
Journal:  Development       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 6.868

2.  Downregulation of reversion-inducing-cysteine-rich protein with Kazal motifs (RECK) is associated with enhanced expression of matrix metalloproteinases and cholangiocarcinoma metastases.

Authors:  N Namwat; J Puetkasichonpasutha; W Loilome; P Yongvanit; A Techasen; A Puapairoj; B Sripa; W Tassaneeyakul; N Khuntikeo; S Wongkham
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 7.527

3.  TIMP-2 upregulates RECK expression via dephosphorylation of paxillin tyrosine residues 31 and 118.

Authors:  J Oh; T Diaz; B Wei; H Chang; M Noda; W G Stetler-Stevenson
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2006-02-20       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 4.  Metastasis-suppressor genes in clinical practice: lost in translation?

Authors:  Alexander N Shoushtari; Russell Z Szmulewitz; Carrie W Rinker-Schaeffer
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  The silencing of RECK gene is associated with promoter hypermethylation and poor survival in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Changsong Zhang; Yang Ling; Chenghui Zhang; Yun Xu; Lu Gao; Rong Li; Jing Zhu; Lieying Fan; Lixin Wei
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 6.580

6.  Expression of RECK and MMP-2 in salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma: Correlation with tumor progression and patient prognosis.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Zhou; Shengyun Huang; Licheng Jiang; Shizhou Zhang; Wengang Li; Zhanwei Chen; Dongsheng Zhang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Correlation between MMPs and their inhibitors in breast cancer tumor tissue specimens and in cell lines with different metastatic potential.

Authors:  Rita C S Figueira; Luciana R Gomes; João S Neto; Fabricio C Silva; Ismael D C G Silva; Mari C Sogayar
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Low RECK Expression Is Part of the Cervical Carcinogenesis Mechanisms.

Authors:  Suellen Herbster; Marina Trombetta-Lima; Paulo Thiago de Souza-Santos; Andressa Paladino; Caio Raony Farina Silveira; Mari Cleide Sogayar; Luisa Lina Villa; Ana Paula Lepique; Enrique Boccardo
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 6.639

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.