Literature DB >> 22419333

Interventions for age-related visual problems in patients with stroke.

Alex Pollock1, Christine Hazelton, Clair A Henderson, Jayne Angilley, Baljean Dhillon, Peter Langhorne, Katrina Livingstone, Frank A Munro, Heather Orr, Fiona J Rowe, Uma Shahani.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of eye problems increases with age and, consequently, so does the level of visual impairment. As the incidence of stroke also increases with age, a significant proportion of stroke patients will have age-related visual problems. It is possible that the effect of interventions for age-related visual problems may differ in the population of stroke patients compared to the wider population of older people. The interaction between the problems arising directly from stroke and those arising directly from age-related visual problems will be complex. Interventions for age-related visual problems may also be affected by the presence of other stroke-related co-morbidities. Consequently, the nature and outcome of interventions for age-related visual problems may be different in patients with stroke.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this review is to determine if interventions for age-related visual problems improve functional ability following stroke. SEARCH
METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (March 2011), the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register (December 2009) and nine electronic bibliographic databases including: the Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1950 to February 2011), EMBASE (1980 to February 2011), CINAHL (1982 to February 2011), AMED (1985 to February 2011) and PsycINFO (1967 to February 2011). We also searched reference lists and trials registers, handsearched journals and conference proceedings, and contacted experts. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials in adults after stroke, where the intervention is specifically targeted at assessing, treating or correcting age-related visual problems, or improving the ability of the patient to cope with visual impairment. Primary outcome was functional ability in activities of daily living and secondary outcomes included functional ability in extended activities of daily living, visual acuity, visual field, visual function, balance, falls, depression and anxiety, discharge destination/residence after stroke, quality of life and social isolation, adverse events and death. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently screened abstracts and planned to extract data and appraise trials. We planned that assessment of methodological quality would be undertaken for allocation concealment, blinding of outcome assessor, method of dealing with missing data and other potential sources of bias. MAIN
RESULTS: We considered 7357 titles, 460 abstracts and 85 full papers. We identified no studies for inclusion in this review. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: There are no implications for practice arising from this review. Evidence relating to the management of patients (from the general population) with age-related visual problems is available from other Cochrane reviews and is likely to be the best evidence available for making treatment decisions about individual patients. Subgroup analyses within these reviews to explore the effect of interventions for age-related visual problems in patients with stroke are recommended. We recommend that the objectives and selection criteria for this Cochrane review are amended and clarified prior to any future updates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22419333     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008390.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  9 in total

Review 1.  Patient reported outcome measures for visual impairment after stroke: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lauren R Hepworth; Fiona J Rowe; Robert Harper; Kathryn Jarvis; Tracey Shipman; Helen Rodgers
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 2.  Mental distress in patients with cerebral visual injury assessed with the german brief symptom inventory.

Authors:  Carolin Gall; Doreen Brösel; Gabriele Helga Franke
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 5.750

3.  Engagement Sensitive Visual Stimulation.

Authors:  Deepesh Kumar; Anirban Dutta; Abhijit Das; Uttama Lahiri
Journal:  Eur J Transl Myol       Date:  2016-06-13

Review 4.  The treatment methods for post-stroke visual impairment: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kerry Louise Hanna; Lauren Rachel Hepworth; Fiona J Rowe
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 2.708

5.  High incidence and prevalence of visual problems after acute stroke: An epidemiology study with implications for service delivery.

Authors:  Fiona J Rowe; Lauren R Hepworth; Claire Howard; Kerry L Hanna; Christopher P Cheyne; Jim Currie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Development of a patient reported outcome measures for measuring the impact of visual impairment following stroke.

Authors:  Lauren R Hepworth; Fiona J Rowe; Girvan Burnside
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Development of core outcome sets and core outcome measures for central visual impairment, visual field loss and ocular motility disorders due to stroke: a Delphi and consensus study.

Authors:  Fiona J Rowe; Lauren R Hepworth; Jamie J Kirkham
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Vision In Stroke cohort: Profile overview of visual impairment.

Authors:  Fiona J Rowe
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 2.708

9.  Development of core outcome sets for vision screening and assessment in stroke: a Delphi and consensus study.

Authors:  Fiona J Rowe; Lauren R Hepworth; Jamie J Kirkham
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-08       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.