Literature DB >> 22418894

Inertial sensors in estimating walking speed and inclination: an evaluation of sensor error models.

Shuozhi Yang1, Annemarie Laudanski, Qingguo Li.   

Abstract

With the increasing interest of using inertial measurement units (IMU) in human biomechanics studies, methods dealing with inertial sensor measurement errors become more and more important. Pre-test calibration and in-test error compensation are commonly used to minimize the sensor errors and improve the accuracy of the walking speed estimation results. However, the performance of a given sensor error compensation method does not only depend on the accuracy of the calibration or the sensor error evaluation, but also strongly relies on the selected sensor error model. The best performance could be achieved only when the essential components of sensor errors are included and compensated. Two new sensor error models, with the concerns about sensor acceleration measurement biases and sensor attachment misalignment, have been developed. The performance of these two error models were evaluated in the shank-mounted IMU-based walking speed/inclination estimation algorithm with a comparison of an existing error model. The treadmill walking experiment, conducted at both level and incline conditions, demonstrated the importance of sensor error model selection on the spatio-temporal gait parameter estimation performance. Accurate walking inclination estimation was made possible with a newly developed sensor error model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22418894     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-012-0887-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  16 in total

1.  Accelerometer and rate gyroscope measurement of kinematics: an inexpensive alternative to optical motion analysis systems.

Authors:  Ruth E Mayagoitia; Anand V Nene; Peter H Veltink
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Assessment of walking features from foot inertial sensing.

Authors:  Angelo M Sabatini; Chiara Martelloni; Sergio Scapellato; Filippo Cavallo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Gait event detection using linear accelerometers or angular velocity transducers in able-bodied and spinal-cord injured individuals.

Authors:  Jan M Jasiewicz; John H J Allum; James W Middleton; Andrew Barriskill; Peter Condie; Brendan Purcell; Raymond Che Tin Li
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Reproducibility of spatio-temporal gait parameters under different conditions in older adults using a trunk tri-axial accelerometer system.

Authors:  Antonia Hartmann; Kurt Murer; Rob A de Bie; Eling D de Bruin
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  'Outwalk': a protocol for clinical gait analysis based on inertial and magnetic sensors.

Authors:  Andrea Giovanni Cutti; Alberto Ferrari; Pietro Garofalo; Michele Raggi; Angelo Cappello; Adriano Ferrari
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  IMU-based ambulatory walking speed estimation in constrained treadmill and overground walking.

Authors:  Shuozhi Yang; Qingguo Li
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 1.763

7.  Quantification of inertial sensor-based 3D joint angle measurement accuracy using an instrumented gimbal.

Authors:  A Brennan; J Zhang; K Deluzio; Q Li
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 2.840

8.  Long-term unrestrained measurement of stride length and walking velocity utilizing a piezoelectric gyroscope.

Authors:  S Miyazaki
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Walking speed estimation using a shank-mounted inertial measurement unit.

Authors:  Q Li; M Young; V Naing; J M Donelan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Test-retest reliability of trunk accelerometric gait analysis.

Authors:  Marius Henriksen; H Lund; R Moe-Nilssen; H Bliddal; B Danneskiod-Samsøe
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.840

View more
  6 in total

1.  Wearable pendant device monitoring using new wavelet-based methods shows daily life and laboratory gaits are different.

Authors:  Matthew A D Brodie; Milou J M Coppens; Stephen R Lord; Nigel H Lovell; Yves J Gschwind; Stephen J Redmond; Michael Benjamin Del Rosario; Kejia Wang; Daina L Sturnieks; Michela Persiani; Kim Delbaere
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Time measurement characterization of stand-to-sit and sit-to-stand transitions by using a smartphone.

Authors:  Hernán A González Rojas; Pedro Chaná Cuevas; Enrique E Zayas Figueras; Salvador Cardona Foix; Antonio J Sánchez Egea
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Analysis of Continuously Varying Kinematics for Prosthetic Leg Control Applications.

Authors:  Kyle R Embry; Robert D Gregg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 4.  Inertial sensor-based methods in walking speed estimation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shuozhi Yang; Qingguo Li
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  An Automatic Gait Feature Extraction Method for Identifying Gait Asymmetry Using Wearable Sensors.

Authors:  Arif Reza Anwary; Hongnian Yu; Michael Vassallo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-02-24       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Estimation of stride-by-stride spatial gait parameters using inertial measurement unit attached to the shank with inverted pendulum model.

Authors:  Yufeng Mao; Taiki Ogata; Hiroki Ora; Naoto Tanaka; Yoshihiro Miyake
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.