BACKGROUND: In 1998 choline Adequate Intakes of 425 and 450 mg/d were established for nonpregnant and pregnant women, respectively. However, to our knowledge, no dose-response studies have been conducted to evaluate the effects of pregnancy or maternal choline intake on biomarkers of choline metabolism. OBJECTIVE: We sought to quantify the effects of pregnancy and maternal choline intake on maternal and fetal indicators of choline metabolism. DESIGN:Healthy pregnant (n = 26; 27 wk gestation) and nonpregnant (n = 21) women were randomly assigned to receive 480 or 930 mg choline/d for 12 wk. Fasting blood samples and placental tissue and umbilical cord venous blood were collected and analyzed for choline and its metabolites. RESULTS: Regardless of the choline intake, pregnant women had higher circulating concentrations of choline (30%; P < 0.001) but lower concentrations of betaine, dimethylglycine, sarcosine, and methionine (13-55%; P < 0.001). Obligatory losses of urinary choline and betaine in pregnant women were ∼2-4 times as high (P ≤ 0.02) as those in nonpregnant women. A higher choline intake yielded higher concentrations of choline, betaine, dimethylglycine, and sarcosine (12-46%; P ≤ 0.08) in both pregnant and nonpregnant women without affecting urinary choline excretion. The higher maternal choline intake also led to a doubling of dimethylglycine in cord plasma (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that an increment of 25 mg choline/d to meet the demands of pregnancy is insufficient and show that a higher maternal choline intake increases the use of choline as a methyl donor in both maternal and fetal compartments. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01127022.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: In 1998 choline Adequate Intakes of 425 and 450 mg/d were established for nonpregnant and pregnant women, respectively. However, to our knowledge, no dose-response studies have been conducted to evaluate the effects of pregnancy or maternal choline intake on biomarkers of choline metabolism. OBJECTIVE: We sought to quantify the effects of pregnancy and maternal choline intake on maternal and fetal indicators of choline metabolism. DESIGN: Healthy pregnant (n = 26; 27 wk gestation) and nonpregnant (n = 21) women were randomly assigned to receive 480 or 930 mg choline/d for 12 wk. Fasting blood samples and placental tissue and umbilical cord venous blood were collected and analyzed for choline and its metabolites. RESULTS: Regardless of the choline intake, pregnant women had higher circulating concentrations of choline (30%; P < 0.001) but lower concentrations of betaine, dimethylglycine, sarcosine, and methionine (13-55%; P < 0.001). Obligatory losses of urinary choline and betaine in pregnant women were ∼2-4 times as high (P ≤ 0.02) as those in nonpregnant women. A higher choline intake yielded higher concentrations of choline, betaine, dimethylglycine, and sarcosine (12-46%; P ≤ 0.08) in both pregnant and nonpregnant women without affecting urinary choline excretion. The higher maternal choline intake also led to a doubling of dimethylglycine in cord plasma (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that an increment of 25 mg choline/d to meet the demands of pregnancy is insufficient and show that a higher maternal choline intake increases the use of choline as a methyl donor in both maternal and fetal compartments. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01127022.
Authors: Christoph Maas; Axel R Franz; Anna Shunova; Michaela Mathes; Christine Bleeker; Christian F Poets; Erwin Schleicher; Wolfgang Bernhard Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2016-05-10 Impact factor: 5.614
Authors: Sajin Bae; Cornelia M Ulrich; Marian L Neuhouser; Olga Malysheva; Lynn B Bailey; Liren Xiao; Elissa C Brown; Kara L Cushing-Haugen; Yingye Zheng; Ting-Yuan David Cheng; Joshua W Miller; Ralph Green; Dorothy S Lane; Shirley A A Beresford; Marie A Caudill Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2014-10-21 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Cydne A Perry; Allyson A West; Antoinette Gayle; Lauren K Lucas; Jian Yan; Xinyin Jiang; Olga Malysheva; Marie A Caudill Journal: J Nutr Date: 2014-08-13 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Linde van Lee; Sarah R Crozier; Izzuddin M Aris; Mya T Tint; Suresh Anand Sadananthan; Navin Michael; Phaik Ling Quah; Sian M Robinson; Hazel M Inskip; Nicholas C Harvey; Mary Barker; Cyrus Cooper; Sendhil S Velan; Yung Seng Lee; Marielle V Fortier; Fabian Yap; Peter D Gluckman; Kok Hian Tan; Lynette P Shek; Yap-Seng Chong; Keith M Godfrey; Mary F F Chong Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Mmadili N Ilozumba; Ting-Yuan D Cheng; Marian L Neuhouser; Joshua W Miller; Shirley A A Beresford; David J Duggan; Adetunji T Toriola; Xiaoling Song; Yingye Zheng; Lynn B Bailey; Aladdin H Shadyab; Simin Liu; Olga Malysheva; Marie A Caudill; Cornelia M Ulrich Journal: J Nutr Date: 2020-11-19 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Jessica A Ash; Ramon Velazquez; Christy M Kelley; Brian E Powers; Stephen D Ginsberg; Elliott J Mufson; Barbara J Strupp Journal: Neurobiol Dis Date: 2014-06-14 Impact factor: 5.996
Authors: Renata H Bahous; Marta Cosín-Tomás; Liyuan Deng; Daniel Leclerc; Olga Malysheva; Ming-Kai Ho; Mercè Pallàs; Perla Kaliman; Barry J Bedell; Marie A Caudill; Rima Rozen Journal: Mol Neurobiol Date: 2018-10-04 Impact factor: 5.590
Authors: Ariel B Ganz; Kelsey Shields; Vlad G Fomin; Yusnier S Lopez; Sanjay Mohan; Jessica Lovesky; Jasmine C Chuang; Anita Ganti; Bradley Carrier; Jian Yan; Siraphat Taeswuan; Vanessa V Cohen; Camille C Swersky; Julie A Stover; Gerardo A Vitiello; Olga V Malysheva; Erika Mudrak; Marie A Caudill Journal: FASEB J Date: 2016-06-24 Impact factor: 5.191