Literature DB >> 22417665

The eutopic endometrium in endometriosis: are the changes of clinical significance?

Ivo Brosens1, Jan J Brosens, Giuseppe Benagiano.   

Abstract

The eutopic endometrium in women suffering from endometriosis is different in many ways from that of healthy controls. Both proliferative and secretory eutopic endometria exhibit changes in endometriosis with heterogeneous responses. In addition, nerve fibres appear in the endometrium and myometrium of these women. The endometrium is a rich source of pro-angiogenic factors and vascular events are often disrupted in endometriosis with an overall increase in angiogenesis. A number of investigations have shown that endometriosis is likely the most common cause of endometrial receptivity defects. Endometriosis is also associated with relative 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type II deficiency and these molecular aberrations indicate that local oestrogen production sustains ectopic implants. Recently it has been shown that endometriosis, as a chronic inflammatory disorder, disrupts co-ordinated progesterone response throughout the reproductive tract, including the endometrium, leading to a condition of 'progesterone resistance'. Investigators have searched for biomarkers of endometriosis, but these investigations are fraught with methodological difficulties. In conclusion, molecular phenotyping of the endometrium is changing the disease paradigm, from being foremost an oestrogen-dependent disease to a disorder characterized primarily by progesterone resistance. In recent years, research on the pathogenesis of endometriosis has been focused on alterations in the uterus and particularly the eutopic endometrium. The eutopic endometrium in women suffering from endometriosis is different in many ways from that of healthy controls. Both proliferative and secretory eutopic endometria exhibit changes in endometriosis with heterogeneous responses. The endometrium is a rich source of pro-angiogenic factors and vascular events are often disrupted in endometriosis with an overall increase in angiogenesis. A number of investigations have shown that endometriosis is likely the most common cause of endometrial receptivity defects. Recently, it has been shown that endometriosis, as a chronic inflammatory disorder, disrupts co-ordinated progesterone response throughout the reproductive tract, including the endometrium, leading to a condition of 'progesterone resistance'. Investigators have searched for biomarkers of endometriosis, but these investigations are fraught with methodological difficulties. In conclusion, molecular phenotyping of the endometrium is changing the disease paradigm; from being foremost an oestrogen-dependent disease to a disorder characterized primarily by progesterone resistance.
Copyright © 2012 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22417665     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.01.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  24 in total

1.  Slit2 overexpression results in increased microvessel density and lesion size in mice with induced endometriosis.

Authors:  Sun-Wei Guo; Yu Zheng; Yuan Lu; Xishi Liu; Jian-Guo Geng
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 3.060

2.  A Comparison of Tissue Spray and Lipid Extract Direct Injection Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry for the Differentiation of Eutopic and Ectopic Endometrial Tissues.

Authors:  Vitaliy Chagovets; Zhihao Wang; Alexey Kononikhin; Natalia Starodubtseva; Anna Borisova; Dinara Salimova; Igor Popov; Andrey Kozachenko; Konstantin Chingin; Huanwen Chen; Vladimir Frankevich; Leila Adamyan; Gennady Sukhikh
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Co-culture with macrophages enhances the clonogenic and invasion activity of endometriotic stromal cells.

Authors:  Rachel W S Chan; Cheuk-Lun Lee; Ernest H Y Ng; William S B Yeung
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 6.831

4.  Immune-inflammation gene signatures in endometriosis patients.

Authors:  Soo Hyun Ahn; Kasra Khalaj; Steven L Young; Bruce A Lessey; Madhuri Koti; Chandrakant Tayade
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Estrogen stabilizes hypoxia-inducible factor 1α through G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 in eutopic endometrium of endometriosis.

Authors:  Ling Zhang; Wenqian Xiong; Na Li; Hengwei Liu; Haitang He; Yu Du; Zhibing Zhang; Yi Liu
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Estrogen-increased SGK1 Promotes Endometrial Stromal Cell Invasion in Adenomyosis by Regulating with LPAR2.

Authors:  Guangzheng Zhong; Qingxue Zhang; Yingchen Wu; Hao Wang; Yi Li; Yangzhi Li; Yihua Liang
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Expression of the transmembrane mucins, MUC1, MUC4 and MUC16, in normal endometrium and in endometriosis.

Authors:  N Dharmaraj; P J Chapela; M Morgado; S M Hawkins; B A Lessey; S L Young; D D Carson
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Research Priorities for Endometriosis.

Authors:  Peter A W Rogers; G David Adamson; Moamar Al-Jefout; Christian M Becker; Thomas M D'Hooghe; Gerard A J Dunselman; Asgerally Fazleabas; Linda C Giudice; Andrew W Horne; M Louise Hull; Lone Hummelshoj; Stacey A Missmer; Grant W Montgomery; Pamela Stratton; Robert N Taylor; Luk Rombauts; Philippa T Saunders; Katy Vincent; Krina T Zondervan
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 3.060

9.  The mid-secretory endometrial transcriptomic landscape in endometriosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  E Vargas; E García-Moreno; L Aghajanova; A Salumets; J A Horcajadas; F J Esteban; S Altmäe
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2022-04-04

Review 10.  Endometriosis and polycystic ovary syndrome are diametric disorders.

Authors:  Natalie L Dinsdale; Bernard J Crespi
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.929

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.