OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively compare the accuracy of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and core-needle biopsy (CNB) for the diagnosis of thyroid malignancy METHODS: We evaluated the results of FNA and CNB in 555 consecutive thyroid nodules with final diagnoses (malignancy 318, benign 237). All patients underwent FNA and CNB simultaneously for each nodule. We assessed the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of FNA, CNB and FNA/CNB for the diagnosis of thyroid malignancy. RESULTS: The sensitivity of FNA, CNB and FNA/CNB for thyroid malignancy was 68.6%, 86.8% and 90.6%, specificity 100%, 99.2% and 99.2%, and accuracy 82.0%, 92.1% and 94.2%, respectively. The sensitivity and accuracy of CNB or FNA/CNB for thyroid malignancy were significantly higher than those of FNA (P < 0.001). Compared with CNB alone, FNA/CNB was more accurate for thyroid malignancy only in small nodules less than 1 cm (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our clinical cohort data demonstrated that CNB was more accurate for the diagnosis of thyroid malignancy than FNA, and FNA/CNB was more accurate than CNB alone in small thyroid nodules. CNB will play a complementary role in optimal surgical decision-making and the management of thyroid nodules. KEY POINTS: • CNB was more accurate for the diagnosis of malignancy than FNA. • Combined FNA/CNB was more accurate than CNB alone in small thyroid nodules. • CNB should play at least a complementary role in managing thyroid nodules.
OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively compare the accuracy of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and core-needle biopsy (CNB) for the diagnosis of thyroid malignancy METHODS: We evaluated the results of FNA and CNB in 555 consecutive thyroid nodules with final diagnoses (malignancy 318, benign 237). All patients underwent FNA and CNB simultaneously for each nodule. We assessed the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of FNA, CNB and FNA/CNB for the diagnosis of thyroid malignancy. RESULTS: The sensitivity of FNA, CNB and FNA/CNB for thyroid malignancy was 68.6%, 86.8% and 90.6%, specificity 100%, 99.2% and 99.2%, and accuracy 82.0%, 92.1% and 94.2%, respectively. The sensitivity and accuracy of CNB or FNA/CNB for thyroid malignancy were significantly higher than those of FNA (P < 0.001). Compared with CNB alone, FNA/CNB was more accurate for thyroid malignancy only in small nodules less than 1 cm (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our clinical cohort data demonstrated that CNB was more accurate for the diagnosis of thyroid malignancy than FNA, and FNA/CNB was more accurate than CNB alone in small thyroid nodules. CNB will play a complementary role in optimal surgical decision-making and the management of thyroid nodules. KEY POINTS: • CNB was more accurate for the diagnosis of malignancy than FNA. • Combined FNA/CNB was more accurate than CNB alone in small thyroid nodules. • CNB should play at least a complementary role in managing thyroid nodules.
Authors: Won-Jin Moon; Jung Hwan Baek; So Lyung Jung; Dong Wook Kim; Eun Kyung Kim; Ji Young Kim; Jin Young Kwak; Jeong Hyun Lee; Joon Hyung Lee; Young Hen Lee; Dong Gyu Na; Jeong Seon Park; Sun Won Park Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2011-01-03 Impact factor: 3.500
Authors: Zubair W Baloch; Edmund S Cibas; Douglas P Clark; Lester J Layfield; Britt-Marie Ljung; Martha Bishop Pitman; Andrea Abati Journal: Cytojournal Date: 2008-04-07 Impact factor: 2.091
Authors: Pierpaolo Trimboli; Naim Nasrollah; Stefano Amendola; Anna Crescenzi; Leo Guidobaldi; Carlo Chiesa; Riccardo Maglio; Giuseppe Nigri; Alfredo Pontecorvi; Francesco Romanelli; Laura Giacomelli; Stefano Valabrega Journal: Gland Surg Date: 2015-08