BACKGROUND/AIMS: Study elucidates and compares the mitochondrial bioenergetic-related molecular basis of sevoflurane and propofol cardioprotection during aortic valve replacement surgery due to aortic valve stenosis. METHODS:Twenty-two patients were prospectively randomized in two groups regarding the anesthetic regime: sevoflurane and propofol. Hemodynamic parameters, biomarkers of cardiac injury and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. In tissue samples, taken from the interventricular septum, key mitochondrial molecules were determined by Western blot, real time PCR, as well as confocal microscopy and immunohisto- and immunocyto-chemical analysis. RESULTS: The protein levels of cytochrome c oxidase and ATP synthase were higher in sevoflurane than in propofol group. Nevertheless, cytochrome c protein content was higher in propofol than sevoflurane receiving patients. Propofol group also showed higher protein level of connexin 43 (Cx43) than sevoflurane group. Besides, immunogold analysis showed its mitochondrial localization. The mRNA level of mtDNA and uncoupling protein (UCP2) were higher in propofol than sevoflurane patients, as well. On the other hand, there were no significant differences between groups in hemodynamic assessment, intensive care unit length of stay, troponin I and BNP level. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that sevoflurane and propofol lead to cardiac protection via different mitochondrially related molecular mechanisms. It appears that sevoflurane acts regulating cytochrome c oxidase and ATP synthase, while the effects of propofol occur through regulation of cytochrome c, Cx43, mtDNA transcription and UCP2.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Study elucidates and compares the mitochondrial bioenergetic-related molecular basis of sevoflurane and propofol cardioprotection during aortic valve replacement surgery due to aortic valve stenosis. METHODS: Twenty-two patients were prospectively randomized in two groups regarding the anesthetic regime: sevoflurane and propofol. Hemodynamic parameters, biomarkers of cardiac injury and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. In tissue samples, taken from the interventricular septum, key mitochondrial molecules were determined by Western blot, real time PCR, as well as confocal microscopy and immunohisto- and immunocyto-chemical analysis. RESULTS: The protein levels of cytochrome c oxidase and ATP synthase were higher in sevoflurane than in propofol group. Nevertheless, cytochrome c protein content was higher in propofol than sevoflurane receiving patients. Propofol group also showed higher protein level of connexin 43 (Cx43) than sevoflurane group. Besides, immunogold analysis showed its mitochondrial localization. The mRNA level of mtDNA and uncoupling protein (UCP2) were higher in propofol than sevofluranepatients, as well. On the other hand, there were no significant differences between groups in hemodynamic assessment, intensive care unit length of stay, troponin I and BNP level. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that sevoflurane and propofol lead to cardiac protection via different mitochondrially related molecular mechanisms. It appears that sevoflurane acts regulating cytochrome c oxidase and ATP synthase, while the effects of propofol occur through regulation of cytochrome c, Cx43, mtDNA transcription and UCP2.
Authors: Luc Leybaert; Paul D Lampe; Stefan Dhein; Brenda R Kwak; Peter Ferdinandy; Eric C Beyer; Dale W Laird; Christian C Naus; Colin R Green; Rainer Schulz Journal: Pharmacol Rev Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 25.468
Authors: Bhawana Agarwal; David F Stowe; Ranjan K Dash; Zeljko J Bosnjak; Amadou K S Camara Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2014-09-16 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Alberto Zangrillo; Mario Musu; Teresa Greco; Ambra Licia Di Prima; Andrea Matteazzi; Valentina Testa; Pasquale Nardelli; Daniela Febres; Fabrizio Monaco; Maria Grazia Calabrò; Jun Ma; Gabriele Finco; Giovanni Landoni Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-07-31 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Xiao Liu; Xiaopeng Liu; Ruike Wang; Hui Luo; Gang Qin; L U Wang; Zhi Ye; Qulian Guo; E Wang Journal: Exp Ther Med Date: 2016-03-24 Impact factor: 2.447